- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you like dynasties or parity?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:22 pm to theballguy
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:22 pm to theballguy
But the yanks had already won 3 previous. I guess what I mean is does fan interest rise when you have teams that keep knocking on the door but don’t make it? Do people root for them more to get over that hump? You have like a build up situation where everybody wants to see if they finally do it.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 4:24 pm
1
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:24 pm to TheWalrus
quote:right here.
People will say parity but then nobody watches a Thunder/Pacers finals.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:32 pm to Madking
and four out of the last 5 previous overall.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:21 pm to AUFANATL
That 1997 Broncos team was really good, it stopped the Pack in their tracks.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:22 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
Hence why the Swifties will be back in the SB again.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:29 pm to Astros 1998
When it’s my team I like dynasties
Otherwise I like parity
Otherwise I like parity
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:42 pm to McMillan
I think by 2000, people got tired of the Yankees. Even the team was tired, they went 87-75, lost 15 out of their last 18 games.
Dynasties take a toll on the mind and body and the Yanks got hot at the right time to threepeat.
People wanted the Yanks to win in 2001 because of 9/11, it would have been a storybook season.
Dynasties take a toll on the mind and body and the Yanks got hot at the right time to threepeat.
People wanted the Yanks to win in 2001 because of 9/11, it would have been a storybook season.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:46 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
People will say parity but then nobody watches a Thunder/Pacers finals.
Wouldn’t watch lakers Celtics either
or Yankees vs whoever, as I hate baseball. Give me parity every year in the nfl or cfb which I actually watch.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 8:10 pm to Astros 1998
I think people don’t realize how much they enjoy rooting against a dynasty.
So they want parity but they’re enjoying themself more when there’s not.
So they want parity but they’re enjoying themself more when there’s not.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:01 pm to Astros 1998
I want my teams to be dynasties. If they can’t be I want parity. Hell, if mine aren’t I’ll even take parody
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:06 pm to TheWalrus
I wonder if there's a way to see how many people were watching game 7 before Halliburton's injury.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:10 pm to TheWalrus
The thunder will be easy to hate soon enough
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:22 am to Astros 1998
The same old teams winning gets old fast. So parity.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 6:08 am to Astros 1998
I hate parity. Everyone is equally mediocre and it’s a coin flip who wins. That’s boring g and no fun.
I want to see the goliaths go at it and the Davids try to take them out. That’s where the fun is.
I want to see the goliaths go at it and the Davids try to take them out. That’s where the fun is.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 6:15 am to Astros 1998
Depends if my team is the dynasty or not
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:14 am to Astros 1998
quote:
No one is tuning into the Brewers, Rays, Blue Jays.
That’s the only time I watch
Did not not watch pitch 1 of WS last year
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 8:31 am
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:29 am to Astros 1998
quote:
the Broncos, Redskins, Giants, Packers, Cowboys, Niners in the Super Bowl every year in the 80s and 90s
Is 6 different teams a dynasty though? Btw the Bills made more SB in the 80s and 90s than all those teams except SF and Denver. Also The Raiders 2 and Bears 1 won in that era.
The NBA by contrast only 5 different teams made the finals between 79-80 and 88-89 : Lakers, 76ers, Celtics, Pistons and Rockets
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 9:03 am
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:40 am to PrimeTime Money
quote:
I want to see the goliaths go at it and the Davids try to take them out. That’s where the fun is.
I think what’s best is seeing the best teams all season play at the end. Not a
“dynasty” unless of course it’s your team
I prefer the Final Four to be 1-2 seeds not what we had with UConn-SDSU, Miami and FAU. I don’t like 9-7 teams in the SB or 84 win teams in the WS but I don’t want the Patriots or Yankees every year either Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:57 am to Astros 1998
Big markets and big names generate revenue. The smaller markets are the Generals and food for the fodder.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 10:10 am to H-Town Tiger
NFC dynasty basically. From 1984 to 1996. Broncos broke the Packers from going No. 14.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News