Started By
Message

re: CFB Various Games Thread 11-4

Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by TheWalrus
Land of the Hogs
Member since Dec 2012
46135 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:09 pm to
shite shite shite
Posted by OK Roughneck
The Sooner State
Member since Aug 2021
17010 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:09 pm to
Be interesting who they give possession to TX or KSTATE
Posted by boston vol
Lexington-Fayette, KY
Member since Sep 2015
6600 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:09 pm to
That’s a game changer
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83482 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:09 pm to
Rutgers passing game strikes again.
Posted by KillerNut9
Pearl Jam
Member since Dec 2007
34710 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
They are 100% going to review this for targeting and I’m going to lose it
Posted by OK Roughneck
The Sooner State
Member since Aug 2021
17010 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
Bad interception for Rutgers.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
That is targeting
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
99858 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
Ugh Rutgers was so close - clever playcall that just backfired

Posted by TheWalrus
Land of the Hogs
Member since Dec 2012
46135 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
Rutgers is done now, too much of a psychological blow
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107891 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
Close to targeting by rule
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
12223 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
Bad break there for Rutgers.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
27855 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:10 pm to
That was targeting.
Posted by TheWalrus
Land of the Hogs
Member since Dec 2012
46135 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
Oh yes that might be
Posted by Marktastic86
Pismo Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2020
20293 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
Of course Rutgers gets 10ypc down to the red zone and decides to throw it into traffic.
Posted by Fus0623
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2015
91305 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
That’s gotta be targeting right?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
If that's targeting, we should stop playing football.
Posted by KillerNut9
Pearl Jam
Member since Dec 2007
34710 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

That is targeting


What else is the safety supposed to do in that situation? Let a diving WR make the catch? He has no where to hit him.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107891 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:11 pm to
Helmet to helmet on a defenseless player. But refs won’t call it unless they want to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:12 pm to
Yeah how is that not targeting?

I just saw a Furman player ejected for targeting for a lot less
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:12 pm to
This is exactly why targeting exists. The defensive player is even hurt

No review means the Big10 made a phone call
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram