- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:52 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Says the LSU fan who is against at the idea of a single FBS playoff that includes all the conferences b/c it's not fair that some teams have easier schedules.
It’s not even that it’s not “fair”, it’s just a waste to include G5 teams because they obviously don’t have the talent to compete with upper echelon power conference schools.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:54 pm to SeeeeK
I would also watch it.
I would much prefer to watch a Tulane vs JMU G5 playoff game than either of the CFP matchups that those teams are involved in.
Give us competitive games that are entertaining.
I would much prefer to watch a Tulane vs JMU G5 playoff game than either of the CFP matchups that those teams are involved in.
Give us competitive games that are entertaining.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:58 pm to msutiger
I'm actually fine with breaking away from the big conferences now. This semi-pro junior NFL thing is not college football.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:02 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
it’s just a waste to include G5 teams because they obviously don’t have the talent to compete with upper echelon power conference schools.
Yet Rutgers can stay in a Power conference.......
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:06 pm to RougeDawg
quote:
This semi-pro junior NFL thing is not college football.
Oh come on, now. Alabama or LSU paying Patel some cash to take the Math 92 Final for their stud receiver is exactly what college athletics is supposed to be.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:27 pm to dupergreenie
quote:
Yet Rutgers can stay in a Power conference.......
Sure, and they’ll probably never make the CFP. I don’t see the relevance of the comment.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:57 pm to Epic Cajun
Imagine how much better a team like Tulane would be with the resources that Rutgers gets from being in their conference.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 2:10 pm to Alt26
I don't think actual college football fans who enjoy competition would "look down" on a G6 playoff like some people keep saying on social media. I don't know anybody who looks down on the FCS playoffs and they're fricking awesome.
It's not about "demoting" G6 schools, it's about creating a competitive environment where there's a more even playing field. From a money standpoint, I'm sure JMU would rather lose 65-0 to Oregon in the CFP than win a G6 playoff, and that's understandable, but from a competition and fandom perspective, I'd much rather have closer, more exciting games.
It's not about "demoting" G6 schools, it's about creating a competitive environment where there's a more even playing field. From a money standpoint, I'm sure JMU would rather lose 65-0 to Oregon in the CFP than win a G6 playoff, and that's understandable, but from a competition and fandom perspective, I'd much rather have closer, more exciting games.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 2:55 pm to dupergreenie
quote:
Imagine how much better a team like Tulane would be with the resources that Rutgers gets from being in their conference.
I don't have anything personally against Tulane, or even JMU.
Just in their current iteration they don't have the resources to field a team that will be competitive versus the upper echelon power conference schools, and it's absurd that we're supposed to pretend that they can.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:03 pm to Kinderman
quote:
Carparelli believes providing neutral postseason sites, like most other NCAA sports have, is paramount. “When you get to that level, having a competitively fair, neutral site environment is very important,” he says.
lol
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:07 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
That's why the site a year if you transfer needs to come back.
would get kicked back by the courts immediately, even in your scenario where the player is still being paid, they are losing a year of development
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:09 pm to Kinderman
quote:
I don't think actual college football fans who enjoy competition would "look down" on a G6 playoff like some people keep saying on social media. I don't know anybody who looks down on the FCS playoffs and they're fricking awesome.
It's not about "demoting" G6 schools, it's about creating a competitive environment where there's a more even playing field. From a money standpoint, I'm sure JMU would rather lose 65-0 to Oregon in the CFP than win a G6 playoff, and that's understandable, but from a competition and fandom perspective, I'd much rather have closer, more exciting games.
It would be awesome for MAC schools, etc. to be playing for actually something bigger.
I have no idea why they wouldn't want it.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:14 pm to Kinderman
Every G6 underclassmen player being courted by a P4 team would still opt out of this dogshit proposal.
Subpar and Mid P4 programs’ Fans are cheering for this to make sure that they are 1 of 62 teams ever fighting for 12 spots.
They want their place at the big table never threatened and knowing they won’t ever win their conference but hopes to get the #11 or #12 At-Large spot one year.
Cheers to both Tulane and JMU playing their rears off tomorrow to show everyone that the margins aren’t that far apart.
Subpar and Mid P4 programs’ Fans are cheering for this to make sure that they are 1 of 62 teams ever fighting for 12 spots.
They want their place at the big table never threatened and knowing they won’t ever win their conference but hopes to get the #11 or #12 At-Large spot one year.
Cheers to both Tulane and JMU playing their rears off tomorrow to show everyone that the margins aren’t that far apart.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:21 pm to Kinderman
Call it the NIT or FIT
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:29 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Call it the NIT or FIT
If it included mid tier B1G or SEC teams that don't make the CFP, then you'd have an actual point.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:30 pm to dupergreenie
quote:
Imagine how much better a team like Tulane would be with the resources that Rutgers gets from being in their conference.
But then they’d have to play that schedule
Posted on 12/19/25 at 3:35 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
But then they’d have to play that schedule
Fine. They want to play that schedule.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:34 pm to UncleLester
quote:
Fine. They want to play that schedule.
Then it would be the dark days again for Tulane
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:39 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
quote:
Imagine how much better a team like Tulane would be with the resources that Rutgers gets from being in their conference.
But then they’d have to play that schedule
And have an additional $50-55 Million at their disposal to recruit, pay athletes, pay coaches, etc.
Rutgers gets about $60 Million per year paid to them from the Big 10 media contract. Tulane gets $7 Million via the AAC contract.
Only a moron would think a Tulane program, that is committed internally like the have been the past few years to their football, couldn't compete with a Big 10 schedule if they had that sort of additional funding.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News