Started By
Message

re: Big12 files in Fed Crt against Texas Tech & Texas AG, to enforce its bylaws & sanctions

Posted on 6/15/26 at 1:44 pm to
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25987 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Kansas AG has now entered the chat
I didn’t have Big 12 civil war on my 2026 bingo card, but I got my popcorn ready
Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1582 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Cannot believe the circus around this dude. You'd think he was Joe Burrow or Cam Newton.

Honestly the funniest outcome of this would be TT burning all their possible goodwill and institutional reputation for this guy, he actually gets to play, and he fricking sucks.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478687 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

he actually gets to play, and he fricking sucks.


Then we find out he bet against TTech in their losses
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67021 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Paxton was such an idiot inserting himself into this nonsense.


He’s constantly a complete dipshit
Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1582 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 3:44 pm to
The Big 12 points out TT’s hypocrisy within the lawsuit itself.

quote:

The Attorney General's and TTU's apparent current position - that the Conference lacks authority under its Bylaws to sanction a member institution whose conduct the Conference Board determines to be sanctionable under Bylaw 3.6 - is directly contradicted by TTU's own prior conduct. The [2016] Baylor sanctions demonstrate that the Conference has previously exercised precisely the type of sanction authority it now seeks to invoke, and that TTU itself voted to authorize and impose those very sanctions without objection.
Posted by WeareLATech
Member since Sep 2021
565 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 8:01 pm to
Damn it gets better
Posted by ColonelAngus
Huntsville,AL
Member since Aug 2023
905 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 9:07 pm to
Hes applying for supplemental draft
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
5172 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

is completely different from Chambliss issue,


So running to a local judge after the NCAA ruled him ineligible via NCAA rules is different how?

Different ruling, but still a ruling.

He was ruled ineligible based on how long he has played and he ran to an Oxford judge to get by the rules the NCAA has set for eligibility.
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
9872 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:39 pm to
I hope the Big12 does not drop the suite just because Sorsby is entering the supplemental draft
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
11852 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:48 pm to
Out of curiosity, when RJ Luis soon files his lawsuit for eligibility are you hoping he wins or loses?
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46565 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Out of curiosity, when RJ Luis soon files his lawsuit for eligibility are you hoping he wins or loses?


Yup. Just like every other gray area eligibility issue such as Shambliss.

Sorsby situation isn’t remotely close but you know that.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
11852 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Sorsby situation isn’t remotely close but you know that.


I'm well aware of that. Which is why I was asking the person I was replying to who was comparing eligibility issues to Sorsby.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram