- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/15/26 at 1:50 pm to castorinho
quote:
Cannot believe the circus around this dude. You'd think he was Joe Burrow or Cam Newton.
Honestly the funniest outcome of this would be TT burning all their possible goodwill and institutional reputation for this guy, he actually gets to play, and he fricking sucks.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 2:02 pm to Kinderman
quote:
he actually gets to play, and he fricking sucks.
Then we find out he bet against TTech in their losses
Posted on 6/15/26 at 2:30 pm to TROLA
quote:
Paxton was such an idiot inserting himself into this nonsense.
He’s constantly a complete dipshit
Posted on 6/15/26 at 3:44 pm to tylercsbn9
The Big 12 points out TT’s hypocrisy within the lawsuit itself.
quote:
The Attorney General's and TTU's apparent current position - that the Conference lacks authority under its Bylaws to sanction a member institution whose conduct the Conference Board determines to be sanctionable under Bylaw 3.6 - is directly contradicted by TTU's own prior conduct. The [2016] Baylor sanctions demonstrate that the Conference has previously exercised precisely the type of sanction authority it now seeks to invoke, and that TTU itself voted to authorize and impose those very sanctions without objection.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 9:07 pm to WeareLATech
Hes applying for supplemental draft
Posted on 6/16/26 at 10:45 am to Icceytiger
quote:
is completely different from Chambliss issue,
So running to a local judge after the NCAA ruled him ineligible via NCAA rules is different how?
Different ruling, but still a ruling.
He was ruled ineligible based on how long he has played and he ran to an Oxford judge to get by the rules the NCAA has set for eligibility.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:39 pm to ColonelAngus
I hope the Big12 does not drop the suite just because Sorsby is entering the supplemental draft
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:48 pm to bluestem75
Out of curiosity, when RJ Luis soon files his lawsuit for eligibility are you hoping he wins or loses?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 8:03 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
Out of curiosity, when RJ Luis soon files his lawsuit for eligibility are you hoping he wins or loses?
Yup. Just like every other gray area eligibility issue such as Shambliss.
Sorsby situation isn’t remotely close but you know that.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 8:24 pm to More beer please
quote:
Sorsby situation isn’t remotely close but you know that.
I'm well aware of that. Which is why I was asking the person I was replying to who was comparing eligibility issues to Sorsby.
Popular
Back to top


0






