- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best programs for developing NFL talent - per 247 Sports
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:52 am
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:52 am
18
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:52 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Finally a win for aTm over Texas.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:54 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Looks to me like Alabama is #1
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:55 am to CGSC Lobotomy
I'm laughing at Michigan and Texas. 
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:56 am to CGSC Lobotomy
What is this time frame over?
Also how was the ratio calculated?
Also how was the ratio calculated?
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 9:57 am
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:57 am to CGSC Lobotomy
What year is this from? I’m a little surprised Clemson only had 18 Top 247 players. That just seems low.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:58 am to GetCocky11
Should Texas even qualify if only 10% of their ranked people get drafted?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:58 am to ReauxlTide222
How is Clemson not no.1 with 61% getting drafted? Isn’t this about development?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:04 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
How is Clemson not no.1 with 61% getting drafted? Isn’t this about development?
Trying to understand that myself. Maybe it's weighted by how highly rated you were in the 247 rankings (#1 vs. #100) and where you were drafted in the NFL (1st round vs. 7th round)?
A&M had both fewer top 247 players and a lower percentage drafted than Notre Dame and was one spot above ND - made no sense to me, either.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:04 am to CGSC Lobotomy
This makes no sense. Florida St has 36 Top247 with 50% of them drafted yet they're ranked lower than Ole Miss who had 18 Top247 with 44% drafted.
Or how about UGA with 33 at 39% behind A&M who has 20 at 35%.
OSU and LSU have almost identical numbers but OSU is a 1.05 and LSU is a 0.89.
All of this is just very weird.
Or how about UGA with 33 at 39% behind A&M who has 20 at 35%.
OSU and LSU have almost identical numbers but OSU is a 1.05 and LSU is a 0.89.
All of this is just very weird.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:07 am to Not Cooper
247 clickbait....
shocking stuff the big time programs in CFB have plenty of players make it to the NFL
shocking stuff the big time programs in CFB have plenty of players make it to the NFL
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:16 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Vandy and Mizzou the only SEC teams not in the Top 29?
Edit: Missing UK and Miss St as well
Edit: Missing UK and Miss St as well
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 10:17 am
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:21 am to CGSC Lobotomy
big difference between being a first round pick and 5-7 round pick
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:25 am to CGSC Lobotomy
I don't understand how Florida is #1. Either it's Bama due to sheer volume, 12 more drafted than Florida, or it's Clemson due to higher percentage drafted than anyone else. Interested in what kind of jacked up math they did to make Florida #1.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:26 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Would like to see a bust percentage or scoring on these, Ole Miss has cranked out a shite ton of draft picks lately but I feel like we also have a lot of NFL busts
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:35 am to GetCocky11
quote:
I'm laughing at Michigan and Texas
USCw is pretty awful too. 48 recruits, 33%.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:39 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
quote:
I'm laughing at Michigan and Texas
USCw is pretty awful too. 48 recruits, 33%.
This may also be an indicator of overrated recruiting classes...
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 10:40 am
Posted on 6/4/19 at 10:59 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Wouldn’t it be more pertinent to show those that weren’t top247 players
Posted on 6/4/19 at 11:00 am to JJ27
quote:
I don't understand how Florida is #1. Either it's Bama due to sheer volume, 12 more drafted than Florida, or it's Clemson due to higher percentage drafted than anyone else. Interested in what kind of jacked up math they did to make Florida #1.
It's the 2010-2014 classes so that includes Urban's legendary 2010 class + Muschamp's top 3-5 classes.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 11:01 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Here is the link to the article
LINK
LINK
quote:
To fairly access a successful development, 247Sports created a “Development Rating.” It's a measure that takes into account the total number of Top247 prospects a program had along with where/if those players were drafted (3 points for 1st rounders, 2 points for 2nd-3rd, 1 for 4th-7th), dividing the total number of prospects by the point total to create the rating. This removes any advantage created by a program’s ability to recruit an overwhelming number of Top247 players. It also rewards programs that produce more first- and second-day picks. The NFL often will draft late-round fliers on talent alone – think Kahlil McKenzie in the sixth round last year.
To more accurately represent how a program develops players, 247Sports removed four categories of prospects from the data: 1. Players who were dismissed. 2. Players who didn’t qualify. 3. Players who medically retired. 4. Players who transferred after two or fewer seasons on campus. If a player stayed three years and transferred, they count against a team’s 'not drafted' tab. If a player transferred and was drafted elsewhere, they count for the team to which they transferred.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News