Started By
Message

re: Bengals (24) vs Bills (18) SNF Thread FINAL

Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

It's objectively correct.

To not go into OT?
Posted by TheWalrus
Land of the Hogs
Member since Dec 2012
46135 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
Now a TD and a XP wins, if they don’t get it, they can still tie with a 2

Did a long thread explaining the math once
Posted by MetryMauler
Member since Sep 2016
7132 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
Win with a TD now. Makes sense mathmatically. Basically you just have to get one out of two 2-point conversions to either win or go to OT.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112266 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Bengals can't go conservative here


And yet...that's exactly what Taylor will do.
Posted by nosaj
Member since Sep 2010
2623 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
The Bengals putting their #3 corner on Diggs is baffling
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71217 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Uhhhh analytics

Analytics say go for two to when missing it forces you to score and go for two to tie?
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
8192 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
Diggs was ticked about security guy being so close, not watching
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86331 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Why go for two?
You need 14 and are confident you will get at least 1 of the 2-pt conversions. And if it's the first, you win the game
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
9974 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
Joe has ice in his veins.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71217 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
That prob does it. Bills dumb for challenging that play
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
49911 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
Security guy isn’t supposed to be watching right?
Posted by UncleLester
West of the Mississippi
Member since Aug 2008
8987 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:17 pm to
Remember when Tirico was suspended 3 months for sexually harassing a co-worker at ESPN?

He was wrong about that too.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
32060 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:18 pm to
You wish they hit that play on second or third down lol but I’ll take it
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:18 pm to
Someone explained it here before and it made little sense to me but I’m pretty stupid
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
32680 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

That prob does it. Bills dumb for challenging that play
Bengals need 1 more first down after the 2 minute warning
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71217 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Someone explained it here before and it made little sense to me but I’m pretty stupid

It would make more sense going for two on the next TD IMO.
Posted by DhanTigers212
Member since Dec 2014
10389 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 pm to
Joe Burrow is good at football
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
9974 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 pm to
Bills were stupid to challenge that play earlier and burn a TO.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108188 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 pm to
For fricks sake do the bills have enough men to field 11 on defense?
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

You need 14

So why do you need any 2 pt conversions
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram