Started By
Message

re: ATL Thread | offseason hot takes + discussion

Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:28 am to
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:28 am to
We have a lot of names. A lot of them had one or two good months last year. If our guys can give us consistent production, we’ll be awesome. They’re just so damn streaky.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:37 am to
Preach, brother.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81275 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:37 am to
If we go into the season with LF platoon of Rosario/Ozuna, either Arcia or Grissom at SS and no real bench to speak of, then I don't really know what we are doing.

Our bullpen took a hit as well with Iglesias presumably going to closer, leaving a hole for the setup role. Matzek is out for the year as well. Joe Jimenez isn't exactly a compelling replacement.

With all of that listed above, it seems like we have to make another move, right? Lux tax be damned.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:44 am to
Iglesias, Minter, and Jimenez are the new back 3.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
904 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:47 am to
The Braves will be the favorites in the East even with whatever moves the Phillies or Mets have made. Baseball is all about pitching and the Braves have the starters and pen to outlast a 162 game season. The playoffs are a total crapshoot as evidenced by the Braves and Dodgers being sent home by teams who got hot.

I agree the Phillies fans can be excited. Turner is a heck of a player. But they have 2 holes on offense like the Braves but their starters aren’t nearly as good as a group and the pen isn’t really close. They are hoping Bohm and Marsh can figure it out just like the Braves are hoping whoever plays short and LF can figure it out. Contreras at DH will be solid. And to do what they did without a real Acuna and an injured Álbies tells me when those 2 get right we’ll be fine.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81275 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 11:48 am to
quote:

and pen


ehhh...
Posted by 21zereaux
Member since Aug 2017
1535 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

With all of that listed above, it seems like we have to make another move, right? Lux tax be damned.


You’d think so, but it will probably be another reclamation project.

The Braves under this ownership and AA just do not make “big” free agent signings. You either take a team friendly deal, or they will let you walk. I don’t see how they will re-sign Dansby in this market given their track record.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 2:29 pm to
I don’t think they ever planned to resign Dansby.
Posted by Dale Murphy
God's Country
Member since Feb 2005
24964 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 2:56 pm to
Me either. And maybe the plan all along was to stay put and hope that Ozzie, a healthy Acuna, and a full season of Harris makes up the 6+ WAR that we’re losing (throwing you Sabermetrics fans a bone here). And that’s a legitimate strategy. Until the other GMs in the NL started spending money like drunken sailors.
Posted by diremustang
Member since Oct 2017
2287 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 3:50 pm to
dansby is not reliable as a 6 WAR player. he averages less than half of that for a full season. he is historically slightly better than average at his position, but some of y'all still think it's negligence for the front office to not offer him the largest or second largest contract in team history
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 3:55 pm to
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6288 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 4:43 pm to
Just a crazy thought, but wonder if the Marlins would do an Ozuna for Avasail Garcia trade?

Ozuna has two years left at 16 plus a 1 million buyout. Garcia has three at 12 plus a 5 million buyout. Would open up 4 million in payroll space each of the next two seasons for Braves, save the Fish $8 million over the lifetime of the deal.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

dansby is not reliable as a 6 WAR player.

True, but analytics hasn’t figured out a good way to quantify and value leadership.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 5:40 pm to
Eh, people said the same thing when. Freddie left.

As long as Snit is the manager, leadership won't be a problem in that clubhouse.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
904 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 5:49 pm to
Yeah, Dansby is simply not worth what he is going to get. And whoever gets him will know that the first month of the season but they’ll be paying for it for 6-8 years.

Those who don’t think AA won’t trade for a stud or pay a stud must have forgotten about Matt Olson. If Dansby was anywhere near as valuable a player as Olson he would have been locked up way before this season was over or even began. But we’ve all watched him struggle with flashes of All a star play. When you strip away his defense which doesn’t matter in todays game and his Atlanta ties he is an average ball player. Grissom will definitely be a step down this coming season but for the cost difference it’s easily the smart move and isn’t a season breaker.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81275 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Eh, people said the same thing when. Freddie left.

As long as Snit is the manager, leadership won't be a problem in that clubhouse.


You literally said when Freddie left, that Dansby would take over the leadership role for Freddie and that AA would extend him because of that.

How many times can you talk out of both sides of your mouth on here?
Posted by Dale Murphy
God's Country
Member since Feb 2005
24964 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

some of y'all still think it's negligence for the front office to not offer him the largest or second largest contract in team history


Who has said this?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81275 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 6:03 pm to
Yeah, literally no one said sign Dansby at all costs. All anyone is asking is to not cut costs for the sake of cutting costs, which is what we would be doing if we roll with Arcia/Grissom at SS.
Posted by 21zereaux
Member since Aug 2017
1535 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 8:09 pm to
Where to begin?

quote:

Those who don’t think AA won’t trade for a stud or pay a stud must have forgotten about Matt Olson.

He under-performed last year by every metric. I’m sure he will do better when the shift is somewhat prevented, but he is not the caliber of player we had at 1st before him at this time.

quote:

If Dansby was anywhere near as valuable a player as Olson he would have been locked up way before this season was over or even began
If he was willing to let himself get fricked by AA for a “team friendly” deal he would have signed, yep. “Team friendly” is another term for getting fricked by management.

quote:

When you strip away his defense which doesn’t matter in todays game and his Atlanta ties he is an average ball player

So defense doesn’t matter nowadays at SS? I would say you were an alter or a troll, but either you are playing the long game and trolling with an account from 2008 and 24 posts, or you don’t watch much baseball, or you have lost your mind. Regardless, and it is a shame anyone has to say this, defense matters a metric frick-ton.

Literally no one in this thread has said to overpay or break the bank for Dansby.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 12/10/22 at 8:10 pm to
How much longer am I gonna live rent free in your head?
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23 ... 62
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 62Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram