re: Anybody have high-def pics of Holmes not catching the TD?

i don't see how you can say it was "clear" since it is being debated all over the place this morning ... the left foot didn't CLEARLY get down .. it may have or it may not have .. you didn't have the conclusive, proper angle from the back of the end zone, down the sideline to make that definitive determination, nap ..

i don't think the call should have been overturned, because the call on the field was a TD and there was no indiputable evidence to over turn it .. because you didn't have any good camera angles ..

Came to this thread looking for pics

leaving utterly disapointed

I can't find anything of the front side to know whether he had the ball at this point or not.

My hunch is that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original ruling.

EDIT: But IMO the other photos show him going up to make the catch, and this pic shows it nestled closer to his body (after the catch was made) with both feet clearly down. So if he in fact has possession at this point (which I assume he does) then its gravy baby.

Get over it. It was a touchdown.

quote:

---

man that right foot looks close -- either way ..

---

Close to what?

That's a fricking TD

you don't know from that angle if he has control of the ball yet .. you can't profess it as water tight either way ..

we caught a break on that call ..

I am 99% sure that it was a catch. I reserve the 1% for that small chance there is some bizarre camera angle which overturns that belief. But it looked good to me as it happened and on review.

I'm with you Baloo, I guess there just isn't much else to talk about if there a huge debate on this play.