Started By
Message

re: ACC champs BCS record is what?

Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:57 pm to
wvu 88 vs ND could have won but Major Harris got hurt

and 93 when UF blew the doors off of us in the sugar bowl
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59286 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

other than FSU's titles the ACC has zippy as well


Ga Tech won an MNC in 1990 (more recently than Pitt).

Of course if we are talking about current ACC teams, besides FSU and GT there is a team that has 5.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59286 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

wvu 88 vs ND could have won but Notre Dame was much better


Pitt won it all in 1976
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Ga Tech won an MNC in 1990


Colorado brah
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59286 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Colorado brah


and Georgia Tech Brah

LINK
This post was edited on 1/5/10 at 11:04 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:04 pm to
yea i know
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36567 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:04 pm to
5th down brah
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

5th down brah


fate
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:09 pm to
I think the ACC is in a down period right now and lots can be blamed for it...

Florida becoming a powerhouse and taking the changing balance of power from Miami and Florida State. Miami was elite in the 80's thru Butch for the most part.

So many schools in such close proximity sharing "non-football" states and areas. NC, Duke, WF, NC State for instance...how must they compete when they have no base to begin with AND they have to share it?

In my opinion, the former Big East schools will always have somewhat of an advantage over the rest. VT established a recruiting base in the Chesapeake and DC areas and have added new ones in the south. Miami can be the USC of the east (and will be again, IMO), and Boston College's semi-tradition and rivalry with Notre Dame will attract more recruits than a North Carolina State or Maryland.

Florida State has little tradition, overall, and may never become what it once was and has been the last 30 years. Still, they're located in Florida.

UNC, NC State, Maryland, and Virginia are schools that will have to rely on landing a huge fish for a head coach (Davis, i.e.) and win for about 3-6 years and then be prepared to lose that coach to a better program and cycle down. In other words, these 4 will never consistently win and are proving that now. See UNC NOW; NC State with Tory Holt and then Phillip Rivers; Maryland's Orange 2001 season; Virginia in the Herman Moore days and nearly going undefeated in '89 and '90.

GT and Clemson are schools that will always have tradition carrying them and can win their conference every single year, but they often fold in OOC big games. They often underachieve and are often compared to their elite predecessors that go as far back as a half century. VT has probably joined that rank...or you can put them in with Florida State if/when they lose Beamer.

Overall, the ACC is a sleeping giant that has yet to reach its potential. Miami is the lead-dog that needs to get back to prominence before the other 11 teams can even attempt to make it look sexy.


Wake Forest and Duke, meanwhile, will just have to settle for basketball. WF just fielded its team of destiny 2 years ago...and that's as good as it'll get. Duke might have an 8 win season every 20...depending.
This post was edited on 1/5/10 at 11:11 pm
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45592 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Overall, the ACC is a sleeping giant that has yet to reach its potential. Miami is the lead-dog that needs to get back to prominence before the other 11 teams can even attempt to make it look sexy.


I agree with this. When Miami was swaggering all over people's faces people were in love with them and able to forget the ACC tag. If VT skullfricks Boise next October watch the love come in. Miami is going to be really good next year, too.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
35828 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

2-10



damn..........
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
159148 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:12 pm to
smart of you to change to a bama logo hoss
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45592 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:13 pm to
ACC is 2-10 and has the same number of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

I agree with this. When Miami was swaggering all over people's faces people were in love with them and able to forget the ACC tag. If VT skullfricks Boise next October watch the love come in. Miami is going to be really good next year, too.


thing is this could all take 10 years to reach its potential who knows what the conference could look like then. With adding teams to compete with the potential Big 10 expansion

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432390 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

and lots can be blamed for it.

it's pretty much coaching

quote:

Florida becoming a powerhouse and taking the changing balance of power from Miami and Florida State

if you're talking about recruiting, this isn't really true. UF is more national now and doesn't get that many SFlorida guys. FSU gets highly-rated classes and doesn't do dick with them. UM had a lot of busts

quote:

So many schools in such close proximity sharing "non-football" states and areas. NC, Duke, WF, NC State for instance...how must they compete when they have no base to begin with AND they have to share it?

that region produce talent. they just have to keep it and develop it
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to
Yeah, when Miami and Florida State beat us in '88 and '90, respectively, by a combined score of 86-6 (even though the ACC was not what it was now)...people took notice.

Miami is the team that this conference is relying on. Not Clemson or VT. Also, when Miami and Florida State were BOTH dominant and had those awesome match ups from '86-'02, it didn't get much better as far as wanting to watch two teams you cared nothing about/disliked battle it out on ABC.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.


The U doesnt count. Those happened while in the BE when they skull fricked all
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
159148 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

and has the same number of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.




that your only argument at this point?
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
18888 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Florida State has little tradition, overall, and may never become what it once was and has been the last 30 years. Still, they're located in Florida.


I wouldn't be so down but FSU will be more then capable of being an elite team again. The late 80s to 2000 type run will never be repeated if that is what you mean. The closest thing to that has been USC since 2001 and look what happened to them this year. Too bad Jimbo isn't the man to lead them back to elite status.
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:17 pm to
SFP, you're being a tad general and vague...

I can give you a nice history lesson on most of the ACC schools and can explain why what is what. Florida is national NOW, but Miami and Florida State were THEN. The reversal of the roles can happen at any moment. All three fall short of the tradition you'd think they'd carry. Florida was never meant to stay on top forever. Miami proved that in 1995 when we found out that THEY can lose.

Coaching is a small part. Some of these schools have SEC-calibur coaches. I agree to you to an extent in my paragraph about the schools that will cycle.
This post was edited on 1/5/10 at 11:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram