- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACC champs BCS record is what?
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:57 pm to The Easter Bunny
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:57 pm to The Easter Bunny
wvu 88 vs ND could have won but Major Harris got hurt
and 93 when UF blew the doors off of us in the sugar bowl
and 93 when UF blew the doors off of us in the sugar bowl
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:58 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
other than FSU's titles the ACC has zippy as well
Ga Tech won an MNC in 1990 (more recently than Pitt).
Of course if we are talking about current ACC teams, besides FSU and GT there is a team that has 5.
Posted on 1/5/10 at 10:59 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
wvu 88 vs ND could have won but Notre Dame was much better
Pitt won it all in 1976
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:01 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Ga Tech won an MNC in 1990
Colorado brah
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:03 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:05 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
5th down brah
fate
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:09 pm to H-Town Tiger
I think the ACC is in a down period right now and lots can be blamed for it...
Florida becoming a powerhouse and taking the changing balance of power from Miami and Florida State. Miami was elite in the 80's thru Butch for the most part.
So many schools in such close proximity sharing "non-football" states and areas. NC, Duke, WF, NC State for instance...how must they compete when they have no base to begin with AND they have to share it?
In my opinion, the former Big East schools will always have somewhat of an advantage over the rest. VT established a recruiting base in the Chesapeake and DC areas and have added new ones in the south. Miami can be the USC of the east (and will be again, IMO), and Boston College's semi-tradition and rivalry with Notre Dame will attract more recruits than a North Carolina State or Maryland.
Florida State has little tradition, overall, and may never become what it once was and has been the last 30 years. Still, they're located in Florida.
UNC, NC State, Maryland, and Virginia are schools that will have to rely on landing a huge fish for a head coach (Davis, i.e.) and win for about 3-6 years and then be prepared to lose that coach to a better program and cycle down. In other words, these 4 will never consistently win and are proving that now. See UNC NOW; NC State with Tory Holt and then Phillip Rivers; Maryland's Orange 2001 season; Virginia in the Herman Moore days and nearly going undefeated in '89 and '90.
GT and Clemson are schools that will always have tradition carrying them and can win their conference every single year, but they often fold in OOC big games. They often underachieve and are often compared to their elite predecessors that go as far back as a half century. VT has probably joined that rank...or you can put them in with Florida State if/when they lose Beamer.
Overall, the ACC is a sleeping giant that has yet to reach its potential. Miami is the lead-dog that needs to get back to prominence before the other 11 teams can even attempt to make it look sexy.
Wake Forest and Duke, meanwhile, will just have to settle for basketball. WF just fielded its team of destiny 2 years ago...and that's as good as it'll get. Duke might have an 8 win season every 20...depending.
Florida becoming a powerhouse and taking the changing balance of power from Miami and Florida State. Miami was elite in the 80's thru Butch for the most part.
So many schools in such close proximity sharing "non-football" states and areas. NC, Duke, WF, NC State for instance...how must they compete when they have no base to begin with AND they have to share it?
In my opinion, the former Big East schools will always have somewhat of an advantage over the rest. VT established a recruiting base in the Chesapeake and DC areas and have added new ones in the south. Miami can be the USC of the east (and will be again, IMO), and Boston College's semi-tradition and rivalry with Notre Dame will attract more recruits than a North Carolina State or Maryland.
Florida State has little tradition, overall, and may never become what it once was and has been the last 30 years. Still, they're located in Florida.
UNC, NC State, Maryland, and Virginia are schools that will have to rely on landing a huge fish for a head coach (Davis, i.e.) and win for about 3-6 years and then be prepared to lose that coach to a better program and cycle down. In other words, these 4 will never consistently win and are proving that now. See UNC NOW; NC State with Tory Holt and then Phillip Rivers; Maryland's Orange 2001 season; Virginia in the Herman Moore days and nearly going undefeated in '89 and '90.
GT and Clemson are schools that will always have tradition carrying them and can win their conference every single year, but they often fold in OOC big games. They often underachieve and are often compared to their elite predecessors that go as far back as a half century. VT has probably joined that rank...or you can put them in with Florida State if/when they lose Beamer.
Overall, the ACC is a sleeping giant that has yet to reach its potential. Miami is the lead-dog that needs to get back to prominence before the other 11 teams can even attempt to make it look sexy.
Wake Forest and Duke, meanwhile, will just have to settle for basketball. WF just fielded its team of destiny 2 years ago...and that's as good as it'll get. Duke might have an 8 win season every 20...depending.
This post was edited on 1/5/10 at 11:11 pm
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:11 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
Overall, the ACC is a sleeping giant that has yet to reach its potential. Miami is the lead-dog that needs to get back to prominence before the other 11 teams can even attempt to make it look sexy.
I agree with this. When Miami was swaggering all over people's faces people were in love with them and able to forget the ACC tag. If VT skullfricks Boise next October watch the love come in. Miami is going to be really good next year, too.
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:12 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
2-10
damn..........
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:12 pm to LSUintheNW
smart of you to change to a bama logo hoss
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:13 pm to LSUintheNW
ACC is 2-10 and has the same number of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:13 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
I agree with this. When Miami was swaggering all over people's faces people were in love with them and able to forget the ACC tag. If VT skullfricks Boise next October watch the love come in. Miami is going to be really good next year, too.
thing is this could all take 10 years to reach its potential who knows what the conference could look like then. With adding teams to compete with the potential Big 10 expansion
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
and lots can be blamed for it.
it's pretty much coaching
quote:
Florida becoming a powerhouse and taking the changing balance of power from Miami and Florida State
if you're talking about recruiting, this isn't really true. UF is more national now and doesn't get that many SFlorida guys. FSU gets highly-rated classes and doesn't do dick with them. UM had a lot of busts
quote:
So many schools in such close proximity sharing "non-football" states and areas. NC, Duke, WF, NC State for instance...how must they compete when they have no base to begin with AND they have to share it?
that region produce talent. they just have to keep it and develop it
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to The Easter Bunny
Yeah, when Miami and Florida State beat us in '88 and '90, respectively, by a combined score of 86-6 (even though the ACC was not what it was now)...people took notice.
Miami is the team that this conference is relying on. Not Clemson or VT. Also, when Miami and Florida State were BOTH dominant and had those awesome match ups from '86-'02, it didn't get much better as far as wanting to watch two teams you cared nothing about/disliked battle it out on ABC.
Miami is the team that this conference is relying on. Not Clemson or VT. Also, when Miami and Florida State were BOTH dominant and had those awesome match ups from '86-'02, it didn't get much better as far as wanting to watch two teams you cared nothing about/disliked battle it out on ABC.
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:14 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.
The U doesnt count. Those happened while in the BE when they skull fricked all
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:15 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
and has the same number of BCS NCs as the Pac10, Big 10, and Big East. Current members of the BE have 0, to be fair.
that your only argument at this point?
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:16 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
Florida State has little tradition, overall, and may never become what it once was and has been the last 30 years. Still, they're located in Florida.
I wouldn't be so down but FSU will be more then capable of being an elite team again. The late 80s to 2000 type run will never be repeated if that is what you mean. The closest thing to that has been USC since 2001 and look what happened to them this year. Too bad Jimbo isn't the man to lead them back to elite status.
Posted on 1/5/10 at 11:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP, you're being a tad general and vague...
I can give you a nice history lesson on most of the ACC schools and can explain why what is what. Florida is national NOW, but Miami and Florida State were THEN. The reversal of the roles can happen at any moment. All three fall short of the tradition you'd think they'd carry. Florida was never meant to stay on top forever. Miami proved that in 1995 when we found out that THEY can lose.
Coaching is a small part. Some of these schools have SEC-calibur coaches. I agree to you to an extent in my paragraph about the schools that will cycle.
I can give you a nice history lesson on most of the ACC schools and can explain why what is what. Florida is national NOW, but Miami and Florida State were THEN. The reversal of the roles can happen at any moment. All three fall short of the tradition you'd think they'd carry. Florida was never meant to stay on top forever. Miami proved that in 1995 when we found out that THEY can lose.
Coaching is a small part. Some of these schools have SEC-calibur coaches. I agree to you to an extent in my paragraph about the schools that will cycle.
This post was edited on 1/5/10 at 11:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News