Started By
Message

re: 2022 Stanley Cup Final Thread - Tampa Bay Lightning @ Colorado Avalanche

Posted on 5/31/22 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 7:59 pm to
Wow they allowed it

What is Toronto doing?
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45901 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by SiriusBraveFan
Member since Nov 2014
744 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:00 pm to
What the heck. Looks like a terrible call.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:00 pm to
That is inexcusable to allow that after replay
Posted by metallica81788
NO
Member since Sep 2008
10585 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:00 pm to
Karma for that disallowed Calgary goal in game 5 maybe

So now they’re talking about delayed tag up rule that I didn’t know about bc he wasn’t directly involved in the play. Made sense when they explained it I guess ?
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 8:02 pm
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:02 pm to
I have no clue how he’s not offside. I mean he had 2 skates in. I get he was coming out and not in play, but still

That rule is terrible. Offside is a cut and dry rule. Can’t be over the line
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 8:03 pm
Posted by NOLA1128
Member since Dec 2011
3958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:02 pm to
I think it makes sense by the way the explained it, but even as an Avs fan… skate wasn’t on the blue line… and it sure looked like puck was on Makar’s blade…
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18416 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:03 pm to
Every map I read designated Tampa. Not Tampa Bay.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115443 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Wow they allowed it

What is Toronto doing?


Bumfuzzled
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:05 pm to
The good thing is we’re not going frame by frame looking for on off this season
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:07 pm to
In that last replay, Makar touched it right on the blue line and didn't touch it again until the other player's skate touched the line. Delayed offsides is the right call.
Posted by NOLA1128
Member since Dec 2011
3958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:07 pm to
I’m a bit behind. Actually, by how they explained it (and the final replay they showed), it’s a good call.

Delayed offsides. It’s only offsides if Makar touches the puck in the offensive zone before Nichushkin gets back.

Pretty clear that wasn’t the case.

Lucky for the Avs, but right call.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115443 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:08 pm to
quote:


I’m a bit behind. Actually, by how they explained it (and the final replay they showed), it’s a good call.

Delayed offsides. It’s only offsides if Makar touches the puck in the offensive zone before Nichushkin gets back.

Pretty clear that wasn’t the case.

Lucky for the Avs, but right call


Makes sense
Posted by NOLA1128
Member since Dec 2011
3958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

MountainTiger


Correct, must’ve beaten me within the minute
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:08 pm to
Shouldn’t matter puck in the zone after player in the zone offside

It’s a terrible call
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45901 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:10 pm to
Makar clearly had possession in the nz
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140863 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:12 pm to
But the puck was in the zone before it was cleared by Colorado. Offside used to be cut and dry just like how the 2 line pass was. Now they’ve tinkered with it for offense. It’s a terrible rule and call

He was in before the puck I get the reasoning I just think it’s a terrible application of the rule and call
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 8:13 pm
Posted by NOLA1128
Member since Dec 2011
3958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

But the puck was in the zone before it was cleared by Colorado. Offside used to be cut and dry just like how the 2 line pass was. Now they’ve tinkered with it for offense. It’s a terrible rule and call



Okay, that’s your opinion, but the call was correct.

It was a delayed offsides that the offensive player didn’t touch the puck while in the offensive zone before anyone else was in the offensive zone. Pretty clear call, and the right one.

Weird to say this, but good on Toronto
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 8:14 pm
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45901 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:14 pm to
Yeah. Pretty bad

Posted by NOLA1128
Member since Dec 2011
3958 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:15 pm to
The other view (the last one the broadcast showed) clearly showed that Toronto got it right. You’re dense or overly opinionated otherwise.

Agree or disagree with the rule. The rule was applied.
Jump to page
Page First 99 100 101 102 103 ... 178
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 101 of 178Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram