- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 20 Charged in Federal College Sports Point Shaving Scheme
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:16 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:16 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:Still cracks me up that the students pulling the strings on that didn't get kicked out of school.
quote:
Tulane
HEY! I'VE SEEN THIS ONE!
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:27 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
I wouldn't touch the big schools if I was one of the ringleaders. There are fewer eyes on smaller programs.
Thats dumb. Much easier to spot large bets on small schools since there’s much fewer bets being placed on the games. A big bet on small school will standout much more than large bets on big time college programs.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:31 pm to rt3
This happens alot more often than people will admit across all sports. These are just the ones that were caught.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:32 pm to rt3
That list is hilarious with everyone being small potatoes. No way in hell there aren’t bigger school names involved. Can’t go after the money makers.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 6:09 pm to rt3
Damn I've bet on like half of those. Time to email FD!
Posted on 1/15/26 at 7:40 pm to lionward2014
quote:
Half the SLC is shaving points and SLU still can't win the conference.
You mean SELU not SLU.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:11 pm to mizslu314
quote:
You mean SELU not SLU.
It’s SLU
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:21 am to rt3
Why should I give a shite? Gambling is legal
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:28 am to SECCaptain
quote:
I'm not talking about a bettor bribing them, I'm talking about someone affiliated with the books doing it. Who gives a shite about the juice if you can get $100 million wagered on a game with 80% on one side and that side loses
They try not to let that happen in the first place. If the money is heavy on one side they adjust the line.
The goal is to have the same amount on both sides so the losers pay the winners and they take the vig out of the payouts. In football the strategy is offset somewhat because they don't like to cross a key number like 3 or 7.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:32 am to Bestbank Tiger
I’m fully aware of how things are supposed to work, but trust me that it’s very frequent for it to end up heavy on one side
E.g 72% of Tickets and 83% of the money is currently on Indiana -7.5 to 8.5
LINK
E.g 72% of Tickets and 83% of the money is currently on Indiana -7.5 to 8.5
LINK
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:11 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
E.g 72% of Tickets and 83% of the money is currently on Indiana -7.5 to 8.5
I don’t bet anymore and don’t keep up with spreads lately.
What was the opening line for game?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:00 pm to rt3
And if truth be told, that's probably the tip of the iceberg
Popular
Back to top

0









