Started By
Message

re: Oil stocks...are you buying?

Posted on 1/27/16 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91056 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 12:51 pm to
Yeah, I'm planning on buying as much as I can afford while it is low. If it drops more I will buy more.

It is @ 8.65% right now.

COP dividend yield
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63201 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 1:10 pm to


I followed your lead and picked up 500 shares of cop I feel real good with just letting that sit until I get closer to retirement.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63201 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 2:10 pm to
What about NOV? Seems almost as good of an opportunity as cop.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91056 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

What about NOV? Seems almost as good of an opportunity as cop.




dividend yield looks good. price looks good. dividend history isn't great. Unless you are buying just for capital appreciation.
Posted by white perch
the bright, happy side of hell
Member since Apr 2012
7636 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 3:16 pm to
I bought some rdsb today
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91056 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I bought some rdsb today



cool.

I'll probably get more soon.

I'm all in for COP and RDSB. No extra money for any other stocks. I'm going to try to make this downfall well worth it with these two regardless how long it takes.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 3:42 pm to
Futures traders are making a killing on this volatility. If they're on the right side anyway.
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 4:07 pm to
lot of majors trading way below the daily 50 dma. I wouldn't touch any of them until they at least close above the 21 dma (daily chart)
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 4:38 pm to
Laffy at ERN end of day 22% spike.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by white perch
the bright, happy side of hell
Member since Apr 2012
7636 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December suggests that labor market conditions improved further even as economic growth slowed late last year. Household spending and business fixed investment have been increasing at moderate rates in recent months, and the housing sector has improved further; however, net exports have been soft and inventory investment slowed. A range of recent labor market indicators, including strong job gains, points to some additional decline in underutilization of labor resources. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation declined further; survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of the further declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further. The Committee is closely monitoring global economic and financial developments and is assessing their implications for the labor market and inflation, and for the balance of risks to the outlook. Given the economic outlook, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation. In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions. Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Stanley Fischer; Esther L. George; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; Eric Rosengren; and Daniel K. Tarullo.


What the hell does this mean?
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:40 pm to
Low interest rates and a strong dollar for for foreseeable future. Unless we get a surprise. War, etc. That's my take based on what we know today. But the data was a mixed bag.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29422 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:58 am to
In a vacuum will the strong dollar prevent oil from rebounding as quickly?
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 5:44 am to
In a vacuum I think so. But that's not the biggest takeaway for me in their press release, and their attachments.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10727 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:22 am to
Oil surging again. Short covering or hope in production cuts? Or pure speculation?
Posted by Grits N Shrimp
Kansas City, MO
Member since Dec 2014
647 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:36 am to
Hope in production cuts
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29422 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:39 am to
Russia agrees to meet with the Saudis regarding production cuts.....

Let's get this shite done!
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10727 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:59 am to
I guess we'll see what happens with that... Since when have either been trustworthy though?
Posted by BROffshoreTigerFan
Edmond, OK
Member since Oct 2007
10004 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 9:36 am to
And then iran's oil hits the market in mid summer. Whatever relief comes from production cuts will be short term.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28247 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 9:39 am to
If ISIS can smuggle oil then so has Iran. Their oil isn't going to push the needle IMO.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 33
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 33Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram