I see lots of you here mentioning QQQ and VOO as “set it and forget it” funds, but what…

Mgk is gonna have a lot of overlap with qqq and voo. Just different weights.

When they largely track the same, just do the one that has the lowest fees. VOO and QQQM are the best known generally.

I've been buying a lot of SPMO lately primarily because it isn't as tech heavy as most of the other mega cap funds

I think FXAIX is the preferred fidelity equivalent

I have SPLG and SCHG as my fuhget aboud its

It also invest part in private companies that the other funds cannot do. It’s worth putting some in. And has outperformed the index. A part because of those private holdings.

quote:

---

I’ve heard and read some good things about this fund lately. Might be worth looking into.

---

Can't go wrong with any of the big cap growth funds such as spyg, schg or the various vanguard offerings (mgk, voog, vug). I think the only difference is how many underlying stocks they hold, some are around 100, others are a bit more spread out and push 200.

I think schg has the most AUM

quote:

---

Vanguard’s MGK

---

Do they have admiral for this? I'm not seeing it

quote:

---

“I think investors are looking beyond just the let’s call it the ‘VOO and chill approach’ where you just buy the index in an ETF, which is a great approach but they’re looking for diversification,” Filmore told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.” “And they’re not finding it within the product or within the index, so they have to look beyond that.”

Filmore refers to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
, which tracks the S&P 500
's performance. Both are up almost 16% so far this year.

‘Imbalance is the perfect word’
Meanwhile, Strategas Securities’ Todd Sohn contends investors are losing diversification by using the S&P 500 as a benchmark.

“Imbalance is the perfect word,” said the firm’s senior ETF & technical strategist in the same interview. He added technology
now accounts for more than 35% of the index, a record high.

---

VOO and CNBC chill