Started By
Message

re: How will the market digest todays rate cut

Posted on 9/19/24 at 9:24 am to
Posted by Art Blakey
Member since Aug 2023
288 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 9:24 am to
quote:



Will the cut of .5 (and, if their goal is reached, a full point by the end of the year) really enough to do more than put a little more lipstick on that pig?


50 bips will slow the acceleration of interest expense but not the trajectory, sir, which is up only short of a radical reintroduction of ZIRP coupled with yield curve control.
Posted by Dav
Dhan
Member since Feb 2010
8144 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 9:25 am to
I’d say it’s currently digesting it pretty well
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24999 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 9:46 am to
3 reds and 15 greens, for now

NVDA leading my charge, and V trying to crash the fun.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
16615 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 9:58 am to
It was anticipated and has already been baked into the cake.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38521 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:


I don’t have a link from 1929 or 1987, but suffice to say it is pretty well recognized that October was bad in those years.
It is? Between (and including) 1929 and 1987, the Dow was down a total of 8 times. That is EIGHT TIMES in 58 years (less than 14% of the time).

quote:

but when it is bad, it is extremely bad.
This has been true, but also not a very big sample size.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16047 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 12:10 pm to
Nasdaq is on a tear

Up 500 + 3%
Posted by SM1010
Member since Oct 2020
1280 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 12:32 pm to
30% year for the S&P looking possible.
Posted by Vastmind
B Ara
Member since Sep 2013
5322 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 12:50 pm to
My portfolio is up 7% today. BTC and MSTR
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
15837 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 1:24 pm to
All dem boys banking on that HSA now wishing and hoping they get at least another year because they missed the boat on most of the stocks.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14568 posts
Posted on 9/19/24 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

It is? Between (and including) 1929 and 1987, the Dow was down a total of 8 times. That is EIGHT TIMES in 58 years (less than 14% of the time).


Yes, it very much is. The DOW is a minute portion of the market. The market was gangbusters last year and still down 3% in October. The market lost 7% in October 2018. Black Monday 1989, Black Monday 2.0 1989, 2008 global financial crisis, 1998 Asian financial crisis were all in October. It is the fourth worst performing month of the year for the S&P since 1928. I am not going to argue with you.

Eleven of the days in the month have averaged negative returns with October 19th historically being the worst day of the year (about 30% lower than the second worst day of the year) and October 22nd is tied for the second worst day of the year (based on returns of the S&P 500 since 1950). If you really cannot recognize that October is one of the weakest months of the year based on objective empirical historical data, I am certainly not going to change your mind with my simpleton posts.
This post was edited on 9/20/24 at 8:32 am
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52215 posts
Posted on 9/20/24 at 5:27 am to
Sounds like I need to buy more in October.
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1465 posts
Posted on 9/20/24 at 7:58 am to
I have been heavy in the S & P 500 since February. It sounds like I need to rebalance (my 401K.) That is to say lock up some gains.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14568 posts
Posted on 9/20/24 at 8:27 am to
Sounds like I need to buy more in October.

If you want to time the market then yes. Especially since it comes after September, which is the worst month of the year historically.
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1465 posts
Posted on 9/20/24 at 8:36 am to
I find your post interesting.

Past data gathered from historic months do not provide any "information" with any predictive value about future months. That is to say that preceding Octobers exert no pressure on future Octobers to conform to probability.

In my opinion October 2024 is a distinct month, not a continuation of any objective empirical historical data.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38521 posts
Posted on 9/20/24 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Yes, it very much is. The DOW is a minute portion of the market. The market was gangbusters last year and still down 3% in October. The market lost 7% in October 2018. Black Monday 1989, Black Monday 2.0 1989, 2008 global financial crisis, 1998 Asian financial crisis were all in October. It is the fourth worst performing month of the year for the S&P since 1928. I am not going to argue with you.
In the time period you prescribed - cherry-picked to include the 2 worst days of all time - October is STILL only down 14% of the time. Your claim does not hold up.

quote:

Eleven of the days in the month have averaged negative returns with October 19th historically being the worst day of the year (about 30% lower than the second worst day of the year) and October 22nd is tied for the second worst day of the year (based on returns of the S&P 500 since 1950). If you really cannot recognize that October is one of the weakest months of the year based on objective empirical historical data, I am certainly not going to change your mind with my simpleton posts.
So now you're talking about INDIVIDUAL DAYS in a month? Holy moving goalposts. Not to mention actually changing the range of dates you were insisting on in the first place.

The fact remains: in the date range you provided, October is the 4th worst month. OK, great. If we expand the range to 1900 - 2023, October climbs all the way to 7th best. Buy and hold investors don't (and shouldn't) recognize October as much of anything more than an irrelevant blip.

quote:

If you really cannot recognize that October is one of the weakest months of the year based on objective empirical historical data, I am certainly not going to change your mind with my simpleton posts
Just not sure which "obective empirical historical data" you are citing. Why are you so dug in on defending a whimsical claim that isn't true? It's OK to make mistakes.

Here's what's true: over most date ranges, October is in the bottom half of months. (Still begs the question of sample size). However, your claim about September is correct - it's basically always last.

Your specific claim was that "October is not usually a good month for markets". Despite the fact that we can list SOME Octobers that were dreadful, that has nothing to do with "usually". Why overstate your case?

quote:

The market was gangbusters last year and still down 3% in October.
And there are many years in the date range in which October was up for the year while the overall market was down.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14568 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I find your post interesting. Past data gathered from historic months do not provide any "information" with any predictive value about future months. That is to say that preceding Octobers exert no pressure on future Octobers to conform to probability. In my opinion October 2024 is a distinct month, not a continuation of any objective empirical historical data.


Of course every year is different. I agree and I am sure almost everyone on this board agrees that every year is different. I place very little value on monthly historical data (admittedly, I did leverage some money for this month in anticipation of a drop, which only materialized for a brief period early in the month, but generally I do not), it is simply a data point to consider. But someone suggested October is historically a bad month. When someone else questioned at assertion, I simply provided data to support the position that October is historically the fourth weakest month of the year and sees some drastic downturns.

Sell in May and go away would have cost people a ton of money this year.

During election years, the market historically does very well. During an election year before 2008, the market never had a double digit loss. If you used that data for your investment strategy in 2008, you got smoked because the S&P 500 was down 37%.
This post was edited on 9/22/24 at 12:49 am
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
19204 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 10:00 am to
With current debt levels and political pressure the Fed cannot keep rates high…despite the fact that doing so would probably be better off for the long term to flush out distortions caused by cheap money. Want to know why PE is buying everything or why home prices have exploded over the last 5 years (or any asset that can be purchased on credit)? That’s why.

Long term lower rates are positive for asset pricing. The short term wil be choppy but as the Fed continues to cut it will be bullish for assets over the long term. That’s my take anyway.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
79316 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Black Monday 1989, Black Monday 2.0 1989, 2008 global financial crisis, 1998 Asian financial crisis were all in October. It is the fourth worst performing month of the year for the S&P since 1928. I am not going to argue with you.


The big question is whether there's something about October or was it just a coincidence that those events happened in October.

As opposed to September which had a black swan event (the 9/11 attacks) unrelated to the general economic environment.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram