Started By
Message

re: GM down over 20% today, is it official done?

Posted on 3/6/09 at 12:28 pm to
Posted by coloradoBengal
Member since Sep 2007
32608 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 12:28 pm to
If GM files bankruptcy, and is able to rework union and supplier contracts, I still don't see it helping. Consumers will simply not have the confidence to purchase a $20,000 to $30,000 vehicle from a company that might not even be able to survive through the warranty period. JMHO.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32745 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:23 pm to
I guess I am in the minority here, but I think that GM may receive a second bailout. I have been trying to rationalize some of the more recent decisions, and here is the theory that makes the most sense.

If GM declares bankruptcy, the market will panic. We may lose another 1000 points in the market before it is all done. However, if GM can stay afloat for a while longer, the market will recover to a certain extent, and when GM goes bankrupt, it will not be as catastrophic on the rest of the stock market. The extremely optimistic viewpoint is that a recovering economy could keep GM afloat in the long-term, but that seems like wishful thinking.

Thoughts?
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

that seems like wishful thinking.

Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32745 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:31 pm to
Yeah, but how about this part?

quote:

If GM declares bankruptcy, the market will panic. We may lose another 1000 points in the market before it is all done. However, if GM can stay afloat for a while longer, the market will recover to a certain extent, and when GM goes bankrupt, it will not be as catastrophic on the rest of the stock market.
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:38 pm to
quote:


If GM files bankruptcy, and is able to rework union and supplier contracts, I still don't see it helping. Consumers will simply not have the confidence to purchase a $20,000 to $30,000 vehicle from a company that might not even be able to survive through the warranty period. JMHO.

One gov't backstop that seems reasonable is that the warranty period is honored. Let's be realistic, GM is not going to disappear next month, next year or even in 10 years. They ahve too much to offer. Limited risk by the gov't, and will overcome hurdles.

The US gov't needs to start doing stuff that is right for america, not right for those entrenched in power.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26525 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

If GM declares bankruptcy, the market will panic.
How much has GM's dire situation already been factored into the market?
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:47 pm to
This part:

quote:

If GM declares bankruptcy, the market will panic. We may lose another 1000 points in the market before it is all done.


There would certainly be a reaction, no question about it. How much I have no idea, it would depend on ch7 v ch11, recovery rates, etc etc.

quote:

However, if GM can stay afloat for a while longer, the market will recover to a certain extent, and when GM goes bankrupt, it will not be as catastrophic on the rest of the stock market.


So if they stay afloat till say...September, and the market has held to around 7500. The loss to bondholders/usgov is now substantially larger, but because the market is ~<10% higher than it is now, that makes it more palatable? I highly disagree, even in the event that we are in a comparably better economic situation/outlook at that time. That is debatable, to say the least.



Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32745 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:48 pm to
Probably quite a bit. The potential collapse of both GE and GM have been looming over the market for quite some time, but there are also investors who think that those two corporations are too big to fail.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

The potential collapse of both GE and GM have been looming over the market for quite some time, but there are also investors who think that those two corporations are too big to fail.



The difference in appearance and health between these two companies is night and day. They are not comparable.

Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32745 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:50 pm to
quote:


So if they stay afloat till say...September, and the market has held to around 7500. The loss to bondholders/usgov is now substantially larger, but because the market is ~<10% higher than it is now, that makes it more palatable? I highly disagree, even in the event that we are in a comparably better economic situation/outlook at that time. That is debatable, to say the least


I don't necessarily think it is a good idea. I am just trying to understand the rationale for continuing to give money to GM, and that's the most reasonable thing that I can think of.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44004 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

potential collapse of both GE and GM


I don't think you can compare those 2 to each other
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 4:54 pm to
Well I don't disagree with you on that point then, but I don't think that is what is likely to happen. Considering the ad-hoc form of bailout that we employ though, your guess is as good as mine.
Posted by LSUFANDS
Denham Springs, La.
Member since Dec 2006
1455 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 6:47 pm to
Why throw good money meaning our money after bad management. The unions are responsible for this mess.Why doesnt the auto makers have the balls to stand up to the unions and operate like toyota and mercedes in this country?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48704 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 8:09 pm to
I don't in no way support this so called stimulus package of Obama's. But the money would have been better spent just giving everyone a check rather than bailing out GM. Atleast this way it would have gotten out and promoted spending.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61449 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

That explains why my Tundra was made in Princeton, IN (body) and Huntsville, AL (engine).

And assembled in San Antonio? I think they make the or some Tundras there.

BTW, teh top selling vehicles in the US are F-150's and Silverados.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44004 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

But the money would have been better spent just giving everyone a check rather than bailing out GM. Atleast this way it would have gotten out and promoted spending.


For $30 billion, the price of the first bailout $13.4 and $16.6 for the 2nd just for GM, the government could have just bought one and a half million cars at $20,000. Could have given one to every solider that fought in the wars.

BTW- GM stock is at a 75 year low (adjusted for splits and other changes)
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
20298 posts
Posted on 3/6/09 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

BTW- GM stock is at a 75 year low


that is truly staggering.

and it takes a lot to stagger these days.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram