Started By
Message

Early IRA Withdrawal

Posted on 12/14/22 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 1:39 pm
My understanding is that an early IRA withdrawal is subject to income taxes plus a 10% penalty. This year our AGI will be in the 24% bracket with room to spare. Next year and into the future I expect to be in the 32+% tax bracket. I am considering early withdrawal from IRA in an amount that would push our AGI to the upper end of the 24% bracket and accepting the penalty. I would use the money to pay down some debt associated with a home remodel - the 10% penalty would "pay out" in 2 years of avoided interest expense. I'm 36 and have a substantial balance in my IRA due to generous employer match (previous employer) and market performance since I started stashing money away in 2009. I don't think the penalty is all that bad when the alternative is not to be able to touch that money for 24 years. Is this a crazy idea, and if so, why??
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1576 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 2:24 pm to
Not really enough info... how much would the withdrawal be and how much is the projected interest with and without extra payments?

quote:

This year our AGI will be in the 24% bracket with room to spare


What does room to spare mean?

quote:

Next year and into the future I expect to be in the 32+% tax bracket


If your income is about to pop, why don't you have the money to pay down the debt faster without stealing from future negatiger?
Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Not really enough info... how much would the withdrawal be and how much is the projected interest with and without extra payments?


This is somewhat hypothetical. We plan to begin a home remodel next year and I plan to finance it through a securities-backed line of credit. I'm ballparking the interest rate at 5%. I could liquidate securities to pay cash but the market is beat up and time is on my side. I don't think the amounts really matter though - if you pay down 5% debt you eliminate the interest on that debt forever.

quote:

What does room to spare mean?


That the withdrawal would be in an amount that would not push us into the 32% bracket.

On the income question, for sure I would use discretionary income in the future to continue to pay down the debt. This is more a question of taking advantage of the the lower marginal tax rate in a year where income is relatively low to future years.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 2:46 pm
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1576 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 2:55 pm to
Ok, then I disagree with the logic.

Random Internet Guy - 1
All other replies - 0

quote:

I'm ballparking the interest rate at 5%.


I think your interest will be higher, maybe a teaser rate at this level, dunno.

quote:

I could liquidate securities to pay cash but the market is beat up and time is on my side.


By your own logic, you're going to take a hit on already taking a hit. I'd aggressively pay it down and roll out.
Posted by bobdylan
Cankton
Member since Aug 2018
1530 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:55 pm to
I discourage people from withdrawing early at all if possible.

quote:

I don't think the penalty is all that bad when the alternative is not to be able to touch that money for 24 years. Is this a crazy idea, and if so, why??


Can all but guarantee yourself in 24 years will regret it.

Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:03 pm to
So you will pay 34% plus state taxes.

I’m Not sure what 24 vs 32 marg rate has to do with this… unless you have committed to doing this and are just trying to decide what year to do it in.

Do you itemize? Is the 5% a potential tax deduction, lowering the true cost?

Are you factoring the foregone future tax deferred growth?

If you are worried about cash flow, can you cut back your current 401k contributions to the point of just enough to get the match?
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:38 pm to
Which is higher, the interest rate on the debt or the 10% withdrawal penalty? (eg, paying 10% to save 6% is bad trade off).

If your income is going up next year and into the future, why did you need debt to fund a home remodel? (eg, forfeiting 20-30 years of IRA value creation for a home remodel is a bad trade off).

Lots of value destruction in your post.

Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Ok, then I disagree with the logic.

Random Internet Guy - 1
All other replies - 0



Don't understand this part. If you want to use numbers, let's say the withdrawal is $100k. If my project is $500k, at 5% interest and a pay-down goal of 7 years (84 months), that's $94K in total interest with a monthly payment of about $7k. If I take the withdrawal, that's 66k after taxes and penalties, so now the loan amount would be $434K, leading to $68K of total interest using same $7k/month payment which shortens the length of the loan to 72 months. So it's $26k in aggregate interest savings. You might say I'm spending $34k to save $26k, but that's too pessimistic because you will pay income taxes on the $100k at some point - and it's impossible to predict what rates may look like in 25+ years. At current tax rates it would be around 12% if that $100k was my only income in a retirement year. So then it's $22k on the margin to save $26k.

quote:

your interest will be higher,


I think you're probably right. Working on scoping this out now. But the "benefit" described above only improves with an increasing rate.

quote:

By your own logic, you're going to take a hit on already taking a hit


I assume you mean because I'm selling assets in the IRA, in a down market, and taking a penalty. Fair point. But I'm locked out of that money until I'm 60, at which point it still carries a tax liability. It feels like there is some value to moving a portion of that into the after tax bucket. Note that when the Trump tax cuts expire the current 24% bracket likely jumps back to 28% and the 12% bracket back to 15%.
Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:40 pm to
No state income taxes

Not committed. I just know this is a "bad idea" by conventional financial wisdom but it isn't so cut and dry to me. I just don't think 24% is a bad deal by historical tax rate standards and don't think it is materially higher than what I will pay in retirement.

Yes I itemize but this isn't a mortgage and don't think it would have a tax benefit

You're on to something on the tax deferral. Mathematically, there is no difference in taxing something in year one and then letting it grow versus letting it grow and then taxing it in the final year, so long as the tax and growth rates are the same. So in my mind this benefit is always over exaggerated. BUT, the after tax scenario get taxed twice - income and capital gains, while the 401k gets taxed once - as income. I had not been thinking about that the right way.

Not worried about cash flow just bugs me that the funds in that IRA are held hostage for so long. I'll likely end up at the point where I have enough money on paper to retire early but will have to keep working until I'm 60 to avoid penalties on MY money. Nice problem to have I guess.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 9:54 pm
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1423 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 1:07 am to
quote:

I am considering early withdrawal from IRA in an amount that would push our AGI to the upper end of the 24% bracket and accepting the penalty.


If you truly think that "tax arbitage" is the correct play then what you are proposing is not the best route. I'm not saying you are right or wrong either way about the tax arbitage. Imo, your analysis should be comparing the 24% tax now to the tax rate when you'll pull the money out for retirement spending.

Basically impossible to determine unless you have concrete retirement withdrawl plans already. This is doubtful given your age. Also it should be your effective tax rate to look at not the bracket.

Anyway imo the correct tax arbtiage play would not be an early IRA withdrawl which incurs a penalty. You should instead be doing a IRA to Roth IRA conversion for the same amount. This way you avoid the penalty while paying the lower tax rate on the conversion amount. Plus you are increasing your Roth assets that are tax free going forward.

When you do a Roth conversion, the principal amount converted can be withdrawn in 5 years penalty free. So this is a way to access IRA retirement assets early. This is a common strategy for people who retire early before 59.5.

If you really want to access IRA assets before 59.5 then 72t withdrawls is another option. However once started it can't be stopped w/o signfinicant penalties. Also, there are penalties if you don't follow and withdraw the correct amount each year which isn't a simple/fixed amount.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rule72t.asp
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 1:09 am
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15869 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 5:41 am to
quote:

Mathematically, there is no difference in taxing something in year one and then letting it grow versus letting it grow and then taxing it in the final year,


The whole point of “tax deferred” investing is “compounding.” It is a struggle to compound IF you are withdrawing with 24 years to go.

Is this project beyond your means? What is the purpose of the remodel?

It’s your money.

The best investments I have had have been the ones I’ve held the longest.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2132 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:56 am to
Sounds like you know this is a bad idea mathematically but you're frustrated about the lack of control over your $. Well you're in lick! As previous poster mentioned you can absolutely access 401k for early retirement penalty free.

Go learn about Rule of 55, Roth conversion ladders, and 72(t) SEPP.

Your securities backed loan is a good option to keep assets invested.and differ capital gains taxes. Start shopping rates early and get the line of credit established before you need it and tested with a small withdrawal. We almost got burned when we needed cash for a real estate transaction and the lone of credit took additional days to establish after we though it was set up.and ready to go. Probably could have gotten slightly better rate too if we switched brokers but that would have meant further delay.

For reference we recently got a floating rate of 1.5% plus SOFR (currently 3.8%). So, rate today is 5.3%. No interest or principal payments required. Rate is better than advertised because we negotiated it down. IBKR has better published rates we used for reference.

Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:57 am to
I think this is a better idea. Thank you.

To your point, I'm likely muddying the waters by tying these two things together. I'm looking at year end tax matters and the thought of the "tax arbitrage" you describe came to mind. Also top of mind is the home project we are likely to take on next year and the best way to finance that. But one does not depend on the other.
Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:07 am to
quote:

whole point of “tax deferred” investing is “compounding.”


Scenario 1:
100k is taxed at 25% and put into a taxable savings account. It earns 10% for 5 years. The value is (100*.75)*(1.1^5).

Scenario 2:
100k is put in a tax deferred account. It earns 10% for 5 years. It is then withdrawn and taxed at 25%. The value is 100*(1.1^5)*.75. Its the same equation, just written in a different order. The money is worth ~121k on a post-income tax basis either way.

The rub is that scenario 1 is still subject to capital gains on the $46k of appreciation. But that has nothing to do with compounding.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17479 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:10 am to
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17479 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:12 am to
My apologies for my my previous gif ferver.

A little subtler:

Posted by Negatiger1986
Inside the Leather
Member since Sep 2010
437 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Your securities backed loan is a good option to keep assets invested.and differ capital gains taxes.


Exactly. I think some are missing that the point of the debt isn't to spend money I don't have but to be smart about market timing ("average out" just like some would "average in") and tax consequences for assets/money I DO have.

Thanks for the data points - helpful post.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15869 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:23 am to
I would bet money that if you take 100 early withdrawals and track them versus a control group of 100 who did not make early withdrawals, that the latter group would have more money 5 years into retirement.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1423 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Also top of mind is the home project we are likely to take on next year and the best way to finance that.



One option is to use your Roth IRA. This assumes the contributions you've made over the years can cover it.

Normally I'd never consider this and only withdraw Roth contributions for a true emergency before retirement.

However if you do the Roth conversion as previouly discussed, then I assume the net change in Roth principal would be a wash.

If that's the case, then I don't see a problem with this option. This would be no different than if you had the option to withdraw from the IRA penalty free.

The con of doing this would be that you no longer have those Roth contributions available for penalty free withdrawl in an emergency. Though in 5 years, the conversion amount would be available.

Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2132 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:36 am to
That Roth is going to be essential for managing taxes during drawdown phase. Roth withdrawals can be used to increase drawdown without increasing taxes, maintaining llw tax bracket for zero LTCG taxable withdrawals, have no RMDs and are inherited tax free. Not to mention giving up the tax free growth is a bad move.

I'd say cash flow it with upcoming raise and/or borrow at favorable rates against their taxable portfolio.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram