Started By
Message

re: Avoiding the inheritance tax

Posted on 5/9/12 at 6:40 pm to
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 6:40 pm to
IDK man I'm not trying to get into a political argument with you about it, agree to disagree.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41359 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 6:43 pm to


I wasn't either. I guess we are just on different levels on what we think is going to happen in the next year
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139538 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Also, it's about to drop to $1MM in a year, which is whay I'm interested in addressing this issue now.
Yep. Could well happen.

Predominately cash/security based estates function well as Trusts. Business do well transferred as FLPs. Were I passing on that farm to my kids, I'd assume an FLP to be a good option.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 7:19 pm to
Have you done any work with WTAS or clients of WTAS?
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 7:28 pm to
HIDDENFLASK

i just went through this. My dad just passed on 10/28/11.

We decided on a "Revocable Living Trust". There is also a irrevocable Living trust.

A few notes.
If Mom and Dads estate totals less than 1mill....no reason to do this unless you have a unruly sibling. (Which was our case)
Basically all of the properties and LLC's become owned by the trust. Surviving spouse has power of the purse. Forced heirship would be next to impossible and taxes can be avoided as long as items stay in the trust. I believe its good for one surviving generation so your kids would have to plan.

If you need a good recommendation to a Estate Planning Attorney ours is awesome.

Now you owe me some investing advice.
This post was edited on 5/9/12 at 7:28 pm
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 7:31 pm to
Revocable= included in estate.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 7:33 pm to
I haven't, but I'm just a peon, so I don't know every one we work with. The lawyers I've worked with on the estate side most regularly are from Ropes & Gray, Vinson Elkins, Kirkland and Ellis, McGuireWoods, Fulbright and Jaworski, Baker Botts, Andrews Kurth based in Houston, Boston, NYC, and Chicago (to my knowledge).
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135041 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Y'all got $5MM+ in assets? WTF are you working for man?

Kfizz, $5 million is not that much money anymore, especially if there are several children to split the money among.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40892 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 8:01 pm to
The split is what gets you.

Because I can do just fine on 65,000 a year for 75 years if I had no debt or kid anchors.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 8:24 pm to
Oh I'm not saying it is, I just know THF IRL and I didn't know he was that loaded. (or "well off" if you prefer)
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139538 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

I didn't know he was that loaded. (or "well off" if you prefer)
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8198 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 8:43 pm to
It doesn't count when it is land.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 9:17 pm to
When it's land, it's called "well endowed".
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 9:28 pm to
The good thing about land (in this context) is that when its non-distributing its gets an enormous discount.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

The good thing about land (in this context) is that when its non-distributing its gets an enormous discount.

Land and closely held businesses are the favorite assets of lawyers and accountants everywhere. Their values are such subjective matters that they provide lawyers and accountants endless opportunities to make money trying to ascertain the value as a whole, and then broken into pieces.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 11:59 pm to
I personally haute when we have to do valuations with land because I think its bullshite, but thats a different story altogether.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/10/12 at 12:28 am to
Given that every piece of land is unique there is only one way to truly deterine its value, and that is in an arms length sale or exchange. Since those don't happen with great frwquency in the estate planning context land valuations are essential. And the opportunities for lawyers and accountants are limitless. And the bullshite that is land valuation is money to the attorneys and accountants who can shovel the bullshite to their clients' benefits.
Posted by The Future
Smallville, KS
Member since Oct 2009
22661 posts
Posted on 5/10/12 at 1:40 am to
Gift it in amounts of 10k (non taxable) before his death
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 5/10/12 at 6:07 am to
I was talking to a client of mine that owns an oil company in Houston. I was asking him about his estate planning and whether or not I should recommend someone for him to meet. He told me that his CPA said he does not have an estate tax problem because most of his wealth is tied up in oil and gas under the ground. Since it under the ground and they really don't know how much is there then they can't put a value on it. I found that strange, but he insisted.
Posted by Newbomb Turk
perfectanschlagen
Member since May 2008
9961 posts
Posted on 5/10/12 at 7:23 am to
quote:

The link just says what happens if they don't change it, I don't see anything that would suggest that's likely, which is all that you and I are currently talking about?


When it comes to the Estate Tax, it's such a political football, that after the complete clusterf*ck/debacle of 2010, I've given up trying to even hazard a f'ing guess.

I went to tons of seminars by all the leading Estate Tax gurus from 2008-2010. Without a single exception, they ALL said that Congress would do something about the Estate Tax prior to 2010, i.e., there was NO F*CKING WAY they were going to let the estate tax just go away for one year.

Well, guess what -- THEY F'ING DID!

And, for big money people who died in 2010, this was the biggest f'ing windfall for the decedents in our lifetime.

Just look at the Steinbrenner children. They got the Yankess (valued at more than $1 Billion) for f'ing free just because George died in 2010.

Who the f*ck would have predicted that?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram