- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
$179 million Picasso - anybody investing in art?
Posted on 5/15/15 at 6:59 am
Posted on 5/15/15 at 6:59 am
Posted on 5/15/15 at 7:24 am to tigerpawl
Art is not an investment. It is a collectable, something held for personal satisfaction rather than the expectation it will provide an economic benefit. Due to the difference in expectations, gains and losses from the sale of collectables are taxed differently than those from investments.
Posted on 5/15/15 at 7:35 am to Poodlebrain
Yes. They claim it returns about 10%, and it reality it is closer to 6.5%. Like anything else, there isn't one blanket answer. 90/10 rule applies here.
Edit - I should add the return is predicated on the particular piece of artwork actually being an alternative investment, and returns are also predicated on API. Art has an API, so what does that tell you?
Edit - I should add the return is predicated on the particular piece of artwork actually being an alternative investment, and returns are also predicated on API. Art has an API, so what does that tell you?
This post was edited on 5/15/15 at 7:40 am
Posted on 5/15/15 at 7:51 am to tigerpawl
quote:
$179 million Picasso - anybody investing in art?
quote:
Louisiana finds $179 million, no cuts to higher education!
Hmmm....
Posted on 5/15/15 at 8:00 am to RadTiger
It is like the tulip bulb crash except they fixed it by having a scarce supply
Posted on 5/15/15 at 8:49 am to GenesChin
quote:
It is like the tulip bulb crash except they fixed it by having a scarce supply
Terrible analogy
Posted on 5/15/15 at 9:03 am to tigerpawl
I'm too young to remember and too lazy to look it up whether this happens after every recession - where the richest usually make the largest gains - but it sure seems like after the '08 crash that prices of extremely high end collectibles has just gone insane. I keep up with the classic Ferrari & vintage Patek Philippe/Rolex markets and they've both lost their minds in the past two years. Prices are doubling and tripling from just a few years ago.
Here is a story about a rare Rolex that sold for $505,000 7 years ago and just sold last week for $1.4MM.
This Patek sold at the same auction for just about $5MM:
Here is a story about a rare Rolex that sold for $505,000 7 years ago and just sold last week for $1.4MM.
This Patek sold at the same auction for just about $5MM:
This post was edited on 5/15/15 at 9:08 am
Posted on 5/15/15 at 9:04 am to GenesChin
Except you can plant tulips and they aren't making any more Picasso's...but other than that, they're totally the same
Posted on 5/15/15 at 9:39 am to iAmBatman
quote:
Except you can plant tulips and they aren't making any more Picasso's...but other than that, they're totally the same
If only I didn't mention the issue of scarcity in my previous post
Both are goods that have aesthetic appeal and are/were status symbols which drove up the price.
Neither Tulips nor Picasso paintings have value beyond that yet both were worth an unbelievable amount.
The lessons learned from Tulip Bulb crisis is about scarcity which doesn't apply to Picasso's but the observation of people paying a shite ton of money for aesthetic status symbols is a great anagy
Posted on 5/15/15 at 10:06 am to RebelOP
Here's a good question: what makes art valuable in the first place? At the time it was painted, this Picasso had a cost basis of about $100 +/- (canvas + paint + a few brushes).
Posted on 5/15/15 at 10:59 am to tigerpawl
Must be where Louisiana "found" $179 million - they sold their picasso
Posted on 5/15/15 at 11:01 am to Poodlebrain
quote:
Art is not an investment.
well I agree with that sentiment, its been a great investment over the last 20 years, especially something like a picasso.
Posted on 5/15/15 at 11:01 am to tigerpawl
quote:
what makes art valuable in the first place?
the market
i.e.
"I want that Picasso, here's $150"
"I want it as well, here's $179M instead of his $150"
This post was edited on 5/15/15 at 11:03 am
Posted on 5/15/15 at 7:02 pm to GaryMyMan
quote:
vintage Patek Philippe/Rolex markets
I love watches, but Patek and Rolex aficionados have gone off the deep end.
Posted on 5/15/15 at 8:07 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Here's a good question: what makes art valuable in the first place? At the time it was painted, this Picasso had a cost basis of about $100 +/- (canvas + paint + a few brushes).
I don't know if you're asking for an actual answer or not, but the answer lies within this quote from Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
There's plenty of money out there. They print more every day. But this ticket, there's only five of them in the whole world, and that's all there's ever going to be. Only a dummy would give this up for something as common as money. Are you a dummy?
Posted on 5/16/15 at 3:53 pm to tigerpawl
Would you pay 35 million pounds to look at this...
n Freud is a 21st century Reubens.
Some art critics say Lucian Freud is a 21st century Reubens, but I would not want THAT painting in my house.
n Freud is a 21st century Reubens.
Some art critics say Lucian Freud is a 21st century Reubens, but I would not want THAT painting in my house.
Posted on 5/16/15 at 4:49 pm to tigerpawl
So, we can post paintings of boobs on TD?
Posted on 5/16/15 at 7:06 pm to TrueTiger
quote:So this raises a very interesting question and eludes to my last post. What is art? Does Chicken see it as art or just a fat girl with boobs? Is Chicken obliged to see it as art and give it a pass just because somebody paid £35 mil for it, or does it still constitute an infraction of the TD regs?
So, we can post paintings of boobs on TD?
This post was edited on 5/16/15 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 5/16/15 at 9:26 pm to tigerpawl
Can you do a DCF on a Picasso? Can you value it using comparable/multiples? If not, no it can't be a part of anybody's portfolio as an investment, at least not on the efficient frontier of the CML. Like someone said, it is a collectible because there is no way to calculate the expected return or risk of such an asset, if you can call it that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News