- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yesterday's targeting call was to put CBK in his place
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:51 am to South21
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:51 am to South21
quote:
It was targeting by the current rules.Nothing more.
Kelly was spot-on in when it comes to if they're really doing what they claim they aim to do with protecting players. Bama's hit was late, dirty, and seemingly intended to hurt Daniels in some way (as that same player has done the same thing to other QBs). And the QB was actually injured and knocked out of a huge game.
Yet, UF's player lowered his head first while our guy went even lower to make the tackle, the ball carrier still went on and got another 5 yards, and our player got thrown out under the player protection targeting rule. Complete load of BS.
0
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:55 am to lsu4life77
Well, BK called those A$$hats out post game. I think that is one of the best things he could have done under the circumstances. He gets mucho kudos for that. The rules are enforced differently for the benefit of certain teams. Everyone with eyes can see it, but he finally pointed out the horse on the dining room table.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:02 pm to lsu4life77
Could be, but I hope he stays after them and other coaches and ADs join in. That would possibly make a difference.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:16 pm to South21
quote:this, people may not agree with the rule but it is the rule, leading contact with the crown of the helmet is targeting.
It was targeting by the current rules.Nothing more.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:22 pm to lsu4life77
Come on Baw, they are just incompetent
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:23 pm to choupiquesushi
So if a flag is not thrown and it is called from a remote review, why is the ball carrier not also ejected for illegally doing the exact same thing, even more deliberately, when we can all clearly see this is what happened?
Is the ball carrier immune to neck injuries?
Is the ball carrier immune to neck injuries?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:24 pm to lsu4life77
I was thinking the same thing….
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:25 pm to lsu4life77
I think you win the award for thousandth person to post this. Congrats!
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:27 pm to South21
No flag was thrown on the play, why was game stopped to review the call. Weak call at best and if you think that’s the letter of the rule, why make it on a weak interpretation with no intent? Don’t understand?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:27 pm to StTiger
quote:
Conference loyalty is stupid
I want every other SEC team to lose every game, in every sport, unless their winning somehow benefits LSU.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:34 pm to Bedtiger
quote:that is how ncaa review works.
No flag was thrown on the play, why was game stopped to review the call. Weak call at best and if you think that’s the letter of the rule, why make it on a weak interpretation with no intent? Don’t understand?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:38 pm to wahoocs
quote:ball carriers are not immune and actually calling it on ball carriers will likely soon be a point of emphasis, that is one place where the rule certainly could use some tweaking - but ball carriers do not initiate contact as often as defenders. possession, illegal participation and targeting all often get reviewed at NCAA level sans a flag. I have called it on a ball carrier.
So if a flag is not thrown and it is called from a remote review, why is the ball carrier not also ejected for illegally doing the exact same thing, even more deliberately, when we can all clearly see this is what happened?
Is the ball carrier immune to neck injuries?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:38 pm to lsu4life77
Somebody needs to stand up to NCAA.
Letting Bama get away with a headhunter intentionally taking a qb out of the game
Letting Bama get away with a headhunter intentionally taking a qb out of the game
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:43 pm to Froman
quote:
I think you win the award for thousandth person to post this. Congrats!
Thank you! I would like to thank Chicken for allowing me to post on this board, the US Army for inventing the Internet and LSU for giving me the opportunity to being a lifelong Tiger, and of course my parents for birthing me!!
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:11 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
ball carriers are not immune and actually calling it on ball carriers will likely soon be a point of emphasis, that is one place where the rule certainly could use some tweaking - but ball carriers do not initiate contact as often as defenders. possession, illegal participation and targeting all often get reviewed at NCAA level sans a flag. I have called it on a ball carrier.
Thx for ur response, esp knowing that u are a respected official
Are you thinking that the not reviewed penalty against Daniels last week, then the not penalized review on Sam this week that led to his ejection are just coincidental?
And a followup to that would be what is your interpretation of the Devin White ejection compared to the Turner non-ejection?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:19 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
this, people may not agree with the rule but it is the rule, leading contact with the crown of the helmet is targeting.
Not true. Contact with crown of the helmet must be accompanied by at least one of four indicators of targeting for it to be called targeting.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:21 pm to lsu4life77
So the SEC office told the officials at the lsu game to call a targeting call against LSU because they wanted to put CBK in his place 1 week after he criticized them?
Some of y’all are fricking dumbasses.
Some of y’all are fricking dumbasses.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:35 pm to lsu4life77
Sam's hit took place multiple times in multiple games. The league office clearly demonstrated bias in this situation. They continue to put themselves ahead of the young men who make sacrifices and dedicate themselves to the sport. Those fat fricking worthless bastards are disgusting
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:38 pm to lsu4life77
quote:
Yesterday's targeting call was to put CBK in his place
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:51 pm to lsu4life77
Absolutely...
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News