- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Y'all ready to admit Burrow > Etling?
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
There were absolutely some people on this board saying this early in the season.
0
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:37 pm to GoldenBoy
Burrow definitely better, but Etling would excel in this offense as well.
Not a fair comparison from the offense last year.
Not a fair comparison from the offense last year.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:37 pm to GoldenBoy
Etling was tough, a gamer, bad back and all.
He gutted it out and did as good of a job as he could do. NO ONE should be trashing him.
Burrow is a doggone good college quarterback, as well. He is healthy, and has wheels which Danny never had.
Both good Tigers. Why is this a thing, anyway?
He gutted it out and did as good of a job as he could do. NO ONE should be trashing him.
Burrow is a doggone good college quarterback, as well. He is healthy, and has wheels which Danny never had.
Both good Tigers. Why is this a thing, anyway?
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:38 pm to GoldenBoy
Yes, I specifically remember slackster as one of them.
The fact Ensminger has the playbook open shows the level of trust they have in Burrow that they didn't in Etling.
I could stand less first down passes that result in 30 yard attempts downfield, but overall, we have been less predictable.
Still plenty of room for improvement in the Red Zone.
The fact Ensminger has the playbook open shows the level of trust they have in Burrow that they didn't in Etling.
I could stand less first down passes that result in 30 yard attempts downfield, but overall, we have been less predictable.
Still plenty of room for improvement in the Red Zone.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:40 pm to GeauxTigerNation
quote:
Literally nobody, and I mean nobody has ever debated this.
Heck yeah, there was. Many ranters were certain that Burrow = Etling.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:41 pm to GoldenBoy
Who the frick thought this? Burrow is and has been better then etling since he got to campus
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:43 pm to GoldenBoy
I hope this wasn’t even a conversation 
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:46 pm to GeauxTigerNation
quote:
Literally nobody, and I mean nobody has ever debated this
Not true.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 1:56 pm to GoldenBoy
Burrow's passes seem to be on the money, for the most part. Like a pitcher hitting his spots. of course I'm drunk for most of the game, but I was drunk when Etling was QB also.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:25 pm to GoldenBoy
quote:
Y'all ready to admit Burrow > Etling?
Wait, I thought we were debating Anthony Jennings being better than Joe Burrow?
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:33 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Who was debating this?
I was debating it up to/through Auburn.
I hadn't seen enough out of Burrow put him over Etling at that point, even if he had potential to be better. He was also completing less than 50% of his passes and whatnot.
I think he's better than Etling now though. I think Canada would/could have gotten more out of Burrow than he got out of Etling.
This post was edited on 10/15/18 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:35 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Burrow definitely better, but Etling would excel in this offense as well. Not a fair comparison from the offense last year.
I feel the exact opposite.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:37 pm to sta4ever
quote:
Wait, I thought we were debating Anthony Jennings being better than Joe Burrow?
Anthony Jennings > Jordan Jefferson!!!
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:43 pm to GoldenBoy
I haven’t even seen Etling mentioned on this board in a while. Wtf are you talking about?
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:47 pm to koLSU86
quote:
I haven’t even seen Etling mentioned on this board in a while. Wtf are you talking about?
It happened. I thought people were rating Burrow based on his potential rather than his actual production/results. His potential was higher than Etling, but he hadn't produced at a higher level through the first few games.
At this point I think Burrow has better talent than Etling, and Canada would have gotten just as much or more out of Burrow.
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:54 pm to GoldenBoy
Easily...
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:57 pm to GoldenBoy
quote:
lsupride87
this poor guy
Posted on 10/15/18 at 2:59 pm to GoldenBoy
While I appreciate what Danny did for us, who the frick thought otherwise?
Posted on 10/15/18 at 3:00 pm to bencoleman
Etling looked pretty damn good in the Ensminger offense as well.
Burrow looks like he has more potential, but I still dont think his field results have shown to be that much better than what Etling showed here yet.
Downvote away my fellow friends
Burrow looks like he has more potential, but I still dont think his field results have shown to be that much better than what Etling showed here yet.
Downvote away my fellow friends
Posted on 10/15/18 at 3:01 pm to slackster
I thought it was readily apparent that Burrow was much more talented than Etling. Not to take anything away from Etling but they're on two different levels.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News