Started By
Message

re: Why Bama fans repeadly say "Winner takes all" ?

Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by touchdown moses
eunice, LA
Member since Nov 2009
6028 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Teague


quote:

National Champs: 1925, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1941, 1945, 1950, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994, 2009




This post was edited on 12/20/11 at 1:33 pm
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

National Champs: 1925, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1941, 1945, 1950, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994, 2009


Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64516 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

National Champs: 1925, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1941, 1945, 1950, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994, 2009

Yeah, it might be easier just to list the year's Bama wasn't national champs, if any exist.
Posted by ole yeller
Bates Motel
Member since May 2009
1938 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:34 pm to
Call me whinney, but I would take the AP trophy, they owe us one don't they??
Posted by pitbull20
Somewhere close... real close
Member since Oct 2003
7765 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:38 pm to
My point is that LSU is already SEC west and SEC Champs with a shot to still be AP champs. Just because it hasn't happened does not prevent it.

Personally I feel it is irrelevant because we win going away, but to say "Winner take all" is to imply the SEC Championship is useless. I disagree.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22272 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Yeah, it might be easier just to list the year's Bama wasn't national champs, if any exist.



I was going to do that, but I think the long list is more visually striking.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22272 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Irony?

Yes. I do believe this is.




Irony? I know it's not....... because I know the definition of "irony."
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
76903 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Yeah, it might be easier just to list the year's Bama wasn't national champs, if any exist.


Instant sig quote. Hope you don't mind.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11947 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

National Champs: 1925, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1941, 1945, 1950, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994, 2009

This statement speaks perfectly of the arrogance and delusion of the gump.
This post was edited on 12/20/11 at 1:56 pm
Posted by 3rdRowTrashTalker
Drunk between Kirby and the Nat
Member since Aug 2011
1841 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

but if we win, we'll be like supreme champions of the universe and stuff.


Would have been even cooler to beat OSU to rack up another top 5 TEAM we beat.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22272 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

This statement speaks perfectly of the arrogance and delusion of the gump.



I got tired of hearing the whining about how Bama's 13 NC's aren't legit. So, now I'm claiming all 26. After all, we claim them all whether they're real or not, right?

Posted by touchdown moses
eunice, LA
Member since Nov 2009
6028 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

we claim them all whether they're real or not, right?

bingo
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22272 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

bingo


So 26 it is.
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

It's only a big victory if you beat them twice.


Doesn't matter. After we have beaten them on January 9, there will still be many claiming Bama to be the better team. It has always been that way.
Posted by touchdown moses
eunice, LA
Member since Nov 2009
6028 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

So 26 it is.

why not just say 46?
since we are playing make believe
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64516 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

So 26 it is.

You should just go ahead and claim a championship for every year. I'm pretty sure the 3rd-grade class at Dothan Elementary voted Bama #1 in 1933 as well.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22272 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

You should just go ahead and claim a championship for every year. I'm pretty sure the 3rd-grade class at Dothan Elementary voted Bama #1 in 1933 as well.



Don't be stupid.


I will only claim the ones we've been awarded.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:16 pm to
If Bama wins, they can't take the SEC west or the SEC? so how is it winner take all?
Posted by XbengalTiger
New Bama Standard 9-4
Member since Oct 2003
5572 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

as far as the CRYSTAL BALL, they are right,
but they are also laying the foundation to denounce the possibility of a split championship.
LSU has already won 2 championships this season. Regardless of what happens in the BCS, LSU was the undefeated SEC Western Division Champion and the undefeated SEC Champion. What division and conference does Bama play in?
Posted by blackjackjackson
fourth dimension
Member since May 2008
7684 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:30 pm to
they even have tee shirts on bama district for something like this.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram