- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is it with this McMahon patience
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:10 am to redfishfan
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:10 am to redfishfan
Yes Wade just had to recruit following the worst season in years with a shite roster and no portal.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:13 am to Tigers4Lyfe
Blame woody for botching the firing on why MM didn’t have more of a team that just made the tourny and was primed for a real run if our admin hadn’t done what they did.
I don’t think sanctions as much as lack of NiL and commitment to a winning program is a bigger hindrance to recruiting at LSU
I don’t think sanctions as much as lack of NiL and commitment to a winning program is a bigger hindrance to recruiting at LSU
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:15 am to Skillet
Basketball isn’t a priority and we shouldn’t expect Scotty to make a great hire. He has not had great success in hiring men’s basketball coaches.
Wade had to be sacrificed for the sins of Les miles and Ed O.
At LSU basketball will be the red headed step child because football is the real money and baseball is second in being the favorite.
Wade had to be sacrificed for the sins of Les miles and Ed O.
At LSU basketball will be the red headed step child because football is the real money and baseball is second in being the favorite.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:18 am to Old Money
quote:
Kinda wild how the year before Wade took over LSU went 10–21 (2–16 SEC) and he turned it around immediately. We almost forget how good of a coach he was due to the biased fake news media hating him Now our fans are in alignment with those who campaigned for our destruction. Sad.
I love Wade and wish he was still at LSU. I also understand you cant compare what he walked into and what McMahon walked in to. Again I'd trade McMahon for Wade tomorrow but I'm also not blinded by delusion to think the programs they walked into were similar. Wade walked into a bad program that was in need of a leader. McMahon walked into a program with 2 players with serious injury problems on the brink of sanctions.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:25 am to redfishfan
Wade didn’t have an open season portal.
Of course if it did exist almost no one from that last roster would have garnered a lot of interest.
They aren’t comparable since one had a losing team and no portal
The other got machine that had just made the tourny but a gutted roster because of the portal and how his new boss handled the old coach.
Sanctions wouldn’t stop a one done or kid looking for one year. Everyone knew no punishment was coming year 1
Of course if it did exist almost no one from that last roster would have garnered a lot of interest.
They aren’t comparable since one had a losing team and no portal
The other got machine that had just made the tourny but a gutted roster because of the portal and how his new boss handled the old coach.
Sanctions wouldn’t stop a one done or kid looking for one year. Everyone knew no punishment was coming year 1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:37 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Sanctions wouldn’t stop a one done or kid looking for one year. Everyone knew no punishment was coming year 1
That's an opinion. LSU doesn't have a history of getting 1 and done guys anyway. The looming sanctions 100% impacted recruiting. And again I love Wade but we were good because he could recruit. He was an average game day coach. And he recruited well because he was paying players. Period. McMahon might not be the answer but he very well could be. Rebuilding a depleted roster with SEC caliber players takes time. College basketball is all about stud 1 and done freshman or experienced guard play. Give McMahon time to have guys in the program a few years. Hell the improvement the team has made since Christmas has been great. Year 3 we need to be in the tourney. Anybody expecting to go from 2 injured players to NCAA tourney in 2 years in today's SEC has unrealistic expectations. We can cite what the team was Wade's last year all you want but McMahon inherited an injury prone Wilkinson and coming off ACL surgery Adam Miller. I can't think of a worse situation to step into.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:42 am to redfishfan
“The looming sanctions 100% impacted recruiting.”
He had the 15th ranked recruiting class his first season. He had the 47th ranked class this year and has the 31st coming next year. The year he had “looming sanctions” has been his best class by far so that narrative doesn’t match up to the data.
He had the 15th ranked recruiting class his first season. He had the 47th ranked class this year and has the 31st coming next year. The year he had “looming sanctions” has been his best class by far so that narrative doesn’t match up to the data.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:52 am to NotaStarGazer
quote:
LSU will not finish middle of the pack! LSU will lose a minimum of 4 out of the next 5 games after just losing 4 out of the last 5. The trend is not remotely up! If McMahon is a stock, I put a market price SELL order on him. LSU will finish about 10th or 11th in the SEC. That is not middle of the pack.
So you're going to judge a coach based on your personal prediction of future games, rather than his actual record?
After 9 league games, the only records that could possibly be defined as "middle of the pack" are 4-5 or 5-4. We are 4-5. If we finish anywhere from 8-10 to 10-8 I'd also consider that middle of the pack.
Let's see what happens.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:52 am to Madking
How many of those guys from the 15th rank class have panned out?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:55 am to redfishfan
So we’re blaming a lack of talent and also blaming the talented players when they don’t develop into stars? Is there any scenario where McMahon is accountable for anything?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:03 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:Which gave him an advantage as he didn't have to compete against every other school in American for pay for play players.
Wade didn’t have an open season portal.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:08 am to tigerbait2010
While McMahon still has something to prove, he inherited a far worse situation than BK and KM. They were completely free to recruit out of the transfer portal without restrictions. The NCAA kept a cloud over the mens basketball program till last fall with very real threats of major sancions/probation. This hamstrung McMahon's recruiting efforts. With a couple of good signees coming in and hopefully some top players out of the portal. We are far better than last year, with very marginal talents. When he gets SEC level talent, I think we'll be really good
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:13 am to Madking
quote:
So we’re blaming a lack of talent and also blaming the talented players when they don’t develop into stars? Is there any scenario where McMahon is accountable for anything?
No I'm just pointing out recruiting rankings in basketball don't mean what you think. Again college basketball is about 1 and done guys or experienced guards that have been in a system for a few years. We haven't had a few years yet. Year 3 is tourney or bust. It's not unreasonable to not rush to judgement and give the guy some time to build his program. I know our fans are known for bashing coaches at any turn. Hell Jay Johnson was getting killed on this site non stop. Our fans think you just shite out winners with zero process. Again I'm not even a big McMahon fan but I'm realistic and understand winning isn't easy in the SEC.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:16 am to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
Which gave him an advantage as he didn't have to compete against every other school in American for pay for play players.
Sure. College basketball is squeaky clean and Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, and Michigan would never pay players. Only that scalawag Will Wade was paying players.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:30 am to TigerFan91
quote:
They are 4-5 in league with three of the losses to top 20 teams on the road.
You didnt mention those wins are against the bottom of the SEC in a very easy front loaded schedule.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:46 am to Choupique19
quote:I knew someone would take the comment as hard and just. Putz
Sure. College basketball is squeaky clean and Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, and Michigan would never pay players. Only that scalawag Will Wade was paying players.
Let me expound just for you.
Sure other schools were doing it too, but that's not like it is now where every school is openly doing it through NIL.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:47 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:47 am to tigerbait2010
None of this is true. McMahon clearly inherited a worse situation, but he’s also taking far more heat (as he should) than either Kelly or Mulkey.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:51 am to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
Sure other schools were doing it too, but that's not like it is now where every school is openly doing it through NIL.
Will Wade is currently leading the biggest turnabout in college basketball for the 23-24 season. He must be out there cheating again, dadgumit.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:03 am to moneyg
quote:
This was always a 3-4 year rebuild. I'm not convinced McMahan is the right guy. But, I'm more convinced than I was at the end of last year.
Huh???? With the transfer portal and only 5 players starting, college basketball should never ever be a 3-4 year rebuild if you have a good coach. There are way too many recent examples where it has been done. Teams have gone from near worst to first in conferences in one season, have gone far in the NCAA tourney, etc. Many years ago, your point may have been true...certainly not any more.
I have seen nothing to justify your optimism in McMahon. In a much longer earlier post, I mentioned his recruiting which has been poor to be generous. And also mentioned in that post that getting the equivalent of LOW 4* is not going to cut it IF those ratings are appropriate for those signees. I wasn't expecting much from him and he has not exceeded my expectations. His ceiling is simply a head coach in a mid-level conference like the MAC, CUSA, etc.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:04 am to More beer please
quote:Oh no now we criticize the program for doing what they are supposed to do? Two of the wins are against bottom feeders, one of the wins is on the road against a tourney team, the other win is at home against a current tourney team.
You didnt mention those wins are against the bottom of the SEC in a very easy front loaded schedule.
The point of the post was progress year over year and acknowledging the three tough road spots. They have to play better in those spots and compete for 40 as opposed to having good runs to cut into deficits. That's a fact.
Back to top
