- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:59 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
Not near enough logos yet
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:30 pm to poncho villa
quote:
Is Coke not a sponsor anymore? Half the fricking screen was them and McDonalds
I’m waiting for Coke bottles on the speakers.
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:31 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
I think Auburn and OUs are bigger
Auburn also had to build support structures outside the stadium to accommodate the new boards.
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:14 pm to The Hurricane
quote:
Auburn also had to build support structures outside the stadium to accommodate the new boards.
Ok, so?
Is LSU incapable of building supports?
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:26 pm to tgrgrd00
Why would anyone want a scoreboard the size of Auburns? Stands out like a sore thumb.
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:31 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:The supports look like shite.
Is LSU incapable of building supports?
Also, can you imagine the exterior of the north endzone with supports on the ground? Think about how much of a shite show that would be on gameday.


Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:32 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:
Ok, so? Is LSU incapable of building supports?
If you’re advocating LSU obstruct what is Tiger Stadium’s best side with the type of support structure that would require, then you aren’t a serious person.

Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:32 pm to PP7 for heisman
So they made the screen bigger just to be covered by the size difference in ads? What the fck?!
Posted on 8/13/24 at 10:48 pm to BananaManCan
quote:
So they made the screen bigger just to be covered by the size difference in ads? What the fck?!
I’m starting to wonder if some of y’all even have eyes.
The space taken up by ads barely increased, if at all.
Posted on 8/13/24 at 11:24 pm to MC5601
quote:
Now instead of static ads they can switch them every 30 seconds or so and double the revenue
I could live with that if they show more replays and turn the ads off during replays, or at least keep the ads sized in a way that allows for the replay to be as large as possible in a 16:9 format.
The scrolling tickers though need to be banned. At times, the ads have literally been bright enough to require shading your eyes with your hand to see the action on the field.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 6:17 am to TigerCub
quote:
Of course they will that one of the whole points of a new board.
Then why didn't they do it the last time we upgraded the videoboard? We had this conversation then as well.
quote:
There is a photo in this thread that someone posted of the entire screen taken up by one video image.
I understand that. Of course they CAN use the entire board, the question is WILL they. If we go off of what they have done in the past, I'm afraid we are going to be disappointed. I hope I'm wrong.
This post was edited on 8/14/24 at 6:18 am
Posted on 8/14/24 at 8:36 am to Supermoto Tiger
quote:
For some reason, it looks no different.
Not even getting into the obvious increase in the height of the board, assuming the in-game screen is used the same as this picture:

That is still considerably larger than what we've used in the past:

The way the old board was used, the width was pretty far within sections 232 and 234. The new one extends to the outer edges of those sections.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 8:49 am to Mickey Goldmill
I’ll be honest that comparison makes the new board look pretty lame. The actual video screen itself barely looks different. They both extend to the middle of sections 232 and 234.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 8:55 am to unctiger4
quote:
I’ll be honest that comparison makes the new board look pretty lame. The actual video screen itself barely looks different. They both extend to the middle of sections 232 and 234.
Too much clutter with the miscellaneous stats and ads on both sides. Needs the live action to span the whole board to be an improvement.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:08 am to Miglez
Thats not a static board. The video will larger for in game play and replays...they will not keep the stats up the whole time!
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:10 am to unctiger4
The way they have the screen set up with the static national championships and ads on both ends. It really isn’t any bigger than the old one. I don’t understand how Mississippi state can figure out how to use the video board and actually make it full use and still have advertisement, but we somehow can’t do it. we can’t even figure out how to do plays in between major plays in the game.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:46 am to unctiger4
quote:
I’ll be honest that comparison makes the new board look pretty lame. The actual video screen itself barely looks different. They both extend to the middle of sections 232 and 234.
Here's a better visual of the in-game screen if they use it the same as the above pic with the baseball game on.

This post was edited on 8/14/24 at 9:49 am
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:48 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Here's a better visual of the in-game screen if they use it the same as the above pic with the baseball game on.
Well shite now that looks way bigger

Perception is everything I guess.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:54 am to ibldprplgld
To be honest the new scoreboard is similar to Michigan's new scoreboards They have 2 identical and they are larger than the south endzone board. LINK
This post was edited on 8/14/24 at 10:10 am
Popular
Back to top
