- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: the onside kick
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:56 pm to MastrShake
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:56 pm to MastrShake
quote:
im sorry but this was not "bang-bang".
it wasnt even bang-bang live. i knew right away that dude got there early.
0
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:58 pm to MastrShake
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC refs at it again!!!!
SEC refs at it again!!!!
Posted on 9/8/10 at 3:05 pm to ctigersgo
Why doesn't it matter that his helmet was on Blue's right/back side when blue had not touched the ball yet? That is a clip!
How can he pass Blue on Blue's back side after making a legal hit on his front side. He can't... Not physically possible.
How can he pass Blue on Blue's back side after making a legal hit on his front side. He can't... Not physically possible.
This post was edited on 9/8/10 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 9/8/10 at 3:08 pm to whiteyc777
quote:
Who is "Atlanta Blue" and why should I believe him?
If he was the scorer of the game as he claims then he is identifiable. His credibility may be questioned, but then I could very well ask who is whieyc777 and why should I believe him?
Posted on 9/8/10 at 3:09 pm to omegaman66
Seems like everyone has their own interpretation of this rule. You would think the NCAA would clarify it so it doesn't happen again.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 3:19 pm to KLSU
The bottom line we need to remember is, that this call did not change the outcome of the game. We all know the SEC refs every year create controversy because of calls they make or don't make. We can only hope that the attention of this call will clarify for the Refs what should or should not be watched for on an onside kick. I know that is wishful thinking but we can hope that the outcome of games will not be affected.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 3:55 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
If he was the scorer of the game as he claims then he is identifiable. His credibility may be questioned, but then I could very well ask who is whieyc777 and why should I believe him?
When have I ever asked anybody to believe me?
-YTC
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:08 pm to mgmer
This particular call didn't change the outcome of the game but....I hope to god we don't run into that again. I thought it was a blatantly and unbelievably bad blown call. It's amazing to me that there are people out there that say it was clean. Unreal.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:11 pm to CPT 8ch
quote:
CPT 8ch
You missed this part:
a. This protection terminates when the kick touches the ground, when any player
of Team B muffs a scrimmage kick beyond the neutral zone, or when any
player of Team B muffs a free kick in the field of play or in the end zone (Rule
6-5-1-a) (A.R. 6-4-1-IV).
As much as I'd like to agree with you, this was a legal play.
After 15 years officiiating high school, I now officiate in the Southland conference so I know this book well.
Pretty scary that a southland conference official came on here and argued that it was the correct call. Then again it is the Southland Conference. But wouldn't surprise me if there aren't plenty more officials in BCS conferences that do not fully understand the rule.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:13 pm to EWE TIGER
why is this thread so long?
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:28 pm to DBG
quote:
why is this thread so long?
Dumbasses
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:45 pm to mgmer
The bottom line we need to remember is, that this call did not change the outcome of the game.
It does however become frustrating when it occurs year after year & seems to more frequently go against LSU --- perhaps that's just my biased view. And the illegal contact was not too subtle since it was obvious from my seat (sec. 224, row 1, seat #13) and the refs are supposed to be watching for it.
It does however become frustrating when it occurs year after year & seems to more frequently go against LSU --- perhaps that's just my biased view. And the illegal contact was not too subtle since it was obvious from my seat (sec. 224, row 1, seat #13) and the refs are supposed to be watching for it.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:48 pm to tiger45br
quote:
It does however become frustrating when it occurs year after year & seems to more frequently go against LSU --- perhaps that's just my biased view. And the illegal contact was not too subtle since it was obvious from my seat (sec. 224, row 1, seat #13) and the refs are supposed to be watching for it.
We get our fair share
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:52 pm to bmy
We get our fair share
Like your positive attitude in light of your avatar picture (if that's what you call it?)
Like your positive attitude in light of your avatar picture (if that's what you call it?)
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:53 pm to tiger45br
quote:
Like your positive attitude in light of your avatar picture (if that's what you call it?)
It's true though. Tbh I've let that call go.. I still hate it but i'm just way to lazy to change avatars.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:56 pm to bmy
Since I am not a lawyer and don't know all the loop holes in these rules, the only thing that I say is LSU needs an interpretation. If it was a legal hit, IF. Then LSU should use this tactic often. But, it is going to cause injuries.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 4:58 pm to rickyh
quote:
Since I am not a lawyer and don't know all the loop holes in these rules, the only thing that I say is LSU needs an interpretation. If it was a legal hit, IF. Then LSU should use this tactic often. But, it is going to cause injuries.
There is no loop hole it's pretty clear cut.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 5:00 pm to bmy
Tbh I've let that call go
You have the right mindset. Saturday I thought I was going to have a stroke during the game between that call and our team's 2nd half play.
You have the right mindset. Saturday I thought I was going to have a stroke during the game between that call and our team's 2nd half play.
Posted on 9/9/10 at 1:13 pm to tiger45br
quote:
It does however become frustrating when it occurs year after year
The TRUTH HAS BEEN SPOKEN!!!!
Posted on 9/10/10 at 7:22 am to Jon1798
quote:
If I see another person talk about the ball hitting the ground, or impeding someone's right to the ball, I just might have to hurt myself. This has nothing to do with anything in this situation.
At least there is one person on here that understands and it sure ain't the Southland Conference Official!!!! :inexcusable:
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News