- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: the fanbase is happy with 8-4
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:34 pm to fightingtiger2335
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:34 pm to fightingtiger2335
I'm happy with 8-4.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:35 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:Spot on, at least for me. Described it perfectly. Especially the "frustration" part.
Nobody is happy with 8-4. Everyone is frustrated. That means negatigers, positiger and realitiger.
People just find different mechanisms to deal with the dissappointment.
My mechanism is to point at all the contributing factors like some sort of mantra instead of focusing on one player or coach (I do get why some do).
In my mind there's a whole bunch to fix. In others, fix one thing and the rest falls into place. Who knows who's right.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:35 pm to fightingtiger2335
The question should be who is "ok" with 8-4 and from reading through this thread there are several who admitted they are and "over it". Some douche in another thread said that 5-5 is mediocre? So that means 8-4 is good? Bunch of low expectation having MFer's.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:35 pm to fightingtiger2335
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:36 pm to fightingtiger2335
I'm still more pissed off about the 10-3 two years ago
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:37 pm to fightingtiger2335
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:38 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
pronounced Tiiiigs!
A solid par year, growth shown, not happy with 8-4 in general, but this one was ok. Slightly impressed by the overall last six games(sans Ark), in contrast to the first six(when the OL couldn't get push vs directionals despite pitching ugly shutouts in OOC)
A solid par year, growth shown, not happy with 8-4 in general, but this one was ok. Slightly impressed by the overall last six games(sans Ark), in contrast to the first six(when the OL couldn't get push vs directionals despite pitching ugly shutouts in OOC)
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:38 pm to okietiger
which means average, which means everyone was OK with it.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:40 pm to TigerCub
quote:
I'm still more pissed off about the 10-3 two years ago
What really pisses me off is
2013 offense with 2010 defense = NC
2013 offense with 2011 defense = GOAT NC
2013 offense with 2012 defense = NC
2013 offense with 2013 defense = 10-3
2013 offense with 2014 defense = Possible NC
fricking drives me nuts.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:41 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
frick a 8-4 but I'm not going to be irrational about season where there was inexperience at all the offensive skill positions either.
I think we should link the definition of irrational for most on this board
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:41 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Win the Bowl Game and 9-4.
I would still be disappointed.
I would still be disappointed.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:43 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
frick a 8-4 but I'm not going to be irrational about season where there was inexperience at all the offensive skill positions either.
This
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:43 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:That actually was not a run on sentence.
Holy run on fricking sentence.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:44 pm to RB10
I agree, our offense is very well coached, just inexperienced in key positions. We're all waiting for the D and O to align
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:44 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
Going 8-4 is about what a lot of us expected. Considering the lack of talent at the QB position, the amount of skill position talent that had to be replaced, and the sometimes moronic offensive game plans, we were fortunate to win 8.
That doesn't mean that we should ask questions about why we didn't try other players/tactics.
That doesn't mean that we should ask questions about why we didn't try other players/tactics.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:48 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
I think we should link the definition of irrational for most on this board
Now you know if I were do that, the irrational ones would want Webster fired because they wouldn't agree with what Websters' definition of what irrational means.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:49 pm to BigBrod81
quote:GOAT post!
Now you know if I were do that, the irrational ones would want Webster fired because they wouldn't agree with what Websters' definition of what irrational means.
Will sleep tonight with that ringing in my ears.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:51 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:
That actually was not a run on sentence.
I think he was talking about the OP but he just responded to me because at the time, my post was the last post. That's why I ignored it in the first place.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:52 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
I agree, our offense is very well coached, just inexperienced in key positions. We're all waiting for the D and O to align
Popular
Back to top



0






