Started By
Message

re: Texas Tech downs Puke

Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:45 pm to
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:45 pm to
Well mostly you’re gonna get a vague stat coupled with some transitive nonsense that tells you nothing. To quote Kobe Bryant.. “stats tell you what happened, they don’t tell you how it happened”. What’s hopeful is Coach Mac went with more 3 across sets vs SMU and that provided Sutton more space to work with. Now a lot of it was off schedule and didn’t start with him but it did free him up some. We need to run more stuff through him because if other teams play us the way Tech did we’re in Barney Rubble trouble.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 11:50 pm
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
38299 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:52 pm to
Yall talking to a loser trying to reason with this clown. He's not even an lsu fan.
Posted by YMCA
It's Fun to Stay
Member since May 2011
4960 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:51 am to
So TT beats a good Dude team and since they beat LSU as well, that means 9-1 or 10-1 LSU is no better than the NIT? Sound logic my friend.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65390 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:06 am to
I should go back and bump the idiots who said Tech was an awful team.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288532 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:58 am to
quote:

who said Tech was an awful team.



no one said that. Love a good Pirate King lie
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65390 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

no one said that. Love a good Pirate King lie


quote:

Posted by Riverside on 12/7/25 at 3:49 pm to Texas Tech isn’t very good this year.


Now, back to your hole, clown.
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3195 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 9:51 am to
So TT only beat N Iowa 101-90. They not only won by 11 but let an FCS team score 90 on them. So do they suck or did they just play a bad game. TT shot 70% from 3 in the first half against us and we shot 16%. That was the difference in the game. Once they return normal shooting and we started taking the ball inside we played them even in the 2nd half. Yes TT has more talent than us right now. They also spend more $$ than us. Duh. But we still have idiots that don’t understand that. And there are top 25 teams getting blown out. Do they suck also. Get a life losers.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37058 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 10:41 am to
This is pathetic. The haters had a solid week after the Tech loss, but now that LSU bounced back with the SMU win all they are left with is reminiscing about 2 weeks ago.

Tech could soon be ranked higher then every SEC team.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
5363 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

They shot 46.7%, why are you people acting like they broke some record for FG% against us?



They shot 48% from 3 my man. I don’t disagree with you but don’t try to make it out like they shot it bad. If a team shot 48% from 3 every game they would go undefeated and win it all.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62095 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

GreenieTiger


Is this a passive aggressive attempt to cope with Tulane being embarrassed yesterday?
Posted by GreenieTiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
418 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:47 pm to
Ah, a La-Z-Boy psychologist. I have nothing to do with Tulane, but a good effort nonetheless.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4296 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Or, like I said, we don’t have alot of different ways to win games and Tech exposed that. They pushed DJ outside the pocket and their bigs handled Nwoko relatively easily. We had nothing else to go to once that happened.


And it took a team who just beat #3 to do that. LSU isn’t an NC contender or even a Top 25 team, but there’s no way to look at the margin in that game and conclude it was an accurate reflection of the relative strength of the two teams.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:09 pm to
You keep bringing up particular stats as if they just randomly happened. The score just showed the discrepancy in the teams. In other words we couldn’t beat them. Whether it was 24, 30 or 18 points, we couldn’t win that game because of what the teams could and couldn’t do.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 2:15 pm
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3195 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:34 pm to
We played them even in second half. Yeah beating them would be difficult but not impossible.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
17772 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

But you are saying Texas tech is clearly better than we are then I agree.


I can tell you that we have good point guard but theirs was better, he was very impressive and while I really like our guy - theirs could do everything ours could, just a little bit better, and he could shoot the 3 a good bit better. He was very impressive.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:58 pm to
“We played them even once the game was decided”


Fixed it for you, that’s irrelevant and inaccurate. They outscored us in the second half as well.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 5:03 pm
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3195 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:46 pm to
34-32. And their coach was benching players for turnovers and giving up shots even when they were up by 30. And our players still played hard which is a sign they play for McMahon.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:47 pm to
35-32, again your moral victories and spin have nothing to do with anything I posted.
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12451 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

should go back and bump the idiots who said Tech was an awful team.


Don’t bother. The usual suspects just want to crap on this team and continue their non-stop assault on McMahon.

Although the vast majority of LSU fans, including me, feel that McMahon is not getting us where we’d like to be, there’s no reason not to give this team support and see how much they’ve improved. I think he was only meant to a transition coach because no one was beating down our doors to follow the mess caused by Wade.

I thought by now the Wade worshippers would’ve stopped living in the past but apparently they still have their heads buried between his thighs.

We have no idea of Verge’s acumen or budget to replace McMahon if this season goes sideways.
Posted by TigerMonkey7
Member since Jul 2021
4200 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:11 pm to
Nearly 50% from 3 is almost impossible to beat
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram