Started By
Message

Stop looking at the offense negatives

Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:11 am
Posted by benoit_BayouBengals
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
2861 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:11 am
This defense is good enough to win you a game. We haven’t seen a defense like this since the Miles era. They’re fast, hit hard and get after the ball in the trenches.

The offense can struggle and we can still win dog fights bc of our defense.

La Tech plays a non traditional defense and that’s why you saw the struggle in the 1st half. We made adjustments and kicked their arse in the 2nd half.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1561 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:13 am to
Even as bad as things looked at times, Green still had over 100 receiving and Tre had 93. We proved it doesn’t have to be a Watkins show.
Posted by TigahTeeth
Georgia
Member since Feb 2016
6622 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:14 am to
I’d be fine with never playing them again. It fricks with our mojo having to scheme around this defensive scheme that nobody else uses.
Posted by In The Know
City of St George, La
Member since Jan 2005
6825 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:15 am to
We should’ve been able to adapt earlier. That’s on Lane/Weiss.
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
10414 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:17 am to
On a bad night still out up over 500 yards.

Just protect the ball
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
20145 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:17 am to
This is what I come to the Rant for. “Don’t look at the negatives, only look at the positives!”
Posted by Former_5_Star
Member since Sep 2025
405 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:18 am to
by the time we get them on the schedule, these coaches and scheme will be elsewhere bro.

We had almost 600 yards. It’s going to be OK.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 10:20 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141100 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

The nation's #3 offense can struggle
FIFY
Posted by ChestRockwell
In the heart of horse country
Member since Jul 2021
8000 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:20 am to
Much reapect to the Bulldogs. They played hard on both sides. Those dudes would walk through fire for that coach. Fans should be proud of that effort.
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
7982 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:21 am to
quote:

La Tech plays a non traditional defense and that’s why you saw the struggle in the 1st half.


So we just have to throw on a non traditional defense at lsu and lane folds?
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25859 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:22 am to
I don’t think we should pretend the negatives don’t exist. They do exist and most look fixable and can be worked through with reps.

I think against a team like ole Miss or a real threat lane isn’t going to bang his head against the wall. Tonight he knew we would win and tried to work through it. Plus La tech has a very unique look.

The only mistake that isn’t fixable would be how our line didn’t look physical. The only thing was they weren’t blowing our line up, it was a free guy coming in from lack of communication. So maybe easier to clean up than we would think.

I haven’t rewatched it but I don’t recall anyone getting roller skated back, almost all the tackles for loss I can recall came from missed assignments.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49658 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:22 am to
quote:

offense can struggle and we can still win dog fights

Against LA Tech.

If we see that some offense as yesterday in SEC play, we're going to lose a lot of SEC games.

Sure, the defense is great, but we can't have turnovers like that. Not sure how you can deny that. Just have to hope it's a one off. Through 2 games, Sam Leavitt's passing has been fairly suspect. His decision making yesterday was god awful. We can win big with him at QB and this defense, but he can't turn the ball over like that.

I do think the defensive scheme made it a little difficult on them. The biggest thing for this offense is protect the ball. We know they're going to score points simply because of the scheme and play calling, just don't shoot yourselves in the foot.

I also think they went into the game wanting to use a more vanilla game plan and not show off Trey'dez as much, but the way the game played out made them have to change their approach a bit.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25859 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:23 am to
If Pete was smart he would throw in some 3-3-5 but good luck with that.

Lane and Charlie wanted to work on things, in a real game I don’t think we keep doing what we did.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
27157 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:34 am to
Yes, we are #3 in total offense nationally after 2 games averaging 44 PPG without the pick 6.

There are some issues which have been pointed out, but it is still a lot of new guys playing together for the first time with a QB who hadn't played in a year in half before last week.

The good news is we have already tried more things through two games than we tried all of last year. Direct snaps to Jones which worked great last week, direct snaps to Treydez which worked last night, Wilson, Wright and Watkins all have carries that got some good yards, we ran a shotgun QB sweep that scored a TD last night which could probably work against a lot of teams, and we saw a little shotgun option last night which probably has potential in the red zone as well.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 10:35 am
Posted by DandyScotte
Lake Charles
Member since Mar 2023
27 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:58 am to
They had almost 300 yards at the half. Lane and Charlie aren’t the ones blocking in the red zone and throwing 3 picks
Posted by RGT
Member since Aug 2024
2384 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:01 am to
Two of the best offensive minds in college football ,yea I’ll blame them.Dumb asses.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96391 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:

La Tech plays a non traditional defense and that’s why you saw the struggle in the 1st half. We made adjustments and kicked their arse in the 2nd half.


This is all true and bears repeating. Even with the pick 6 and a number of turnovers - frankly, the turnovers in the red zone just eliminating the pick 6 and the other interception in the redzone and settling for FGs (and assuming we made both), that would have been a 100% redzone percentage and a 51-(garbage time) 7, "more" impressive beatdown of a, frankly, overperforming team that beat its prior opponent 80-0.

I'm not saying La Tech are giants. I'm saying they are maximized as a team. They played as well as they can with the personnel they have (some of whom will play on Sundays), we didn't play as well as we could have, it was still a laugher (from late in the 3rd) and we were pulling away.

The inability to get hard yards and the OL woes in pass protection are still troubling.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96391 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

If Pete was smart he would throw in some 3-3-5 but good luck with that.


This isn't schoolyard football. You can experiment, situationally, with some different packages, but you can't just install a 3-3-5 for one game.

#Thatsnothowfootballworks
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
13043 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:12 am to
Can we say Kiffin decided to go more vanilla this game in offense as not to show all plays that will be used against Omiss? Not sure why since they should know Kiffins office to a T.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 11:13 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96391 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Can we say Kiffin decided to go more vanilla this game in offense as not to show all plays that will be used against Omiss?


I think they tried to stay fairly vanilla in the first half, but that got thrown out in the second.

quote:

Not sure why since they should know Kiffins office to a T.


And that should be a wash, because Lane and CWJ should know Ole Miss (defense and offense) to a T as well.

While we're on the subject, would any Ole Miss defensive starter, other than Echoles, start at LSU in 2026?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram