1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Skyy Clark now ruled ineligible (ETA maybe not)
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:43 pm to purplengold1
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:43 pm to purplengold1
We HAVE to keep Donovan dent
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:52 pm to king47
quote:
We HAVE to keep Donovan dent
The hearing to convert the TRO to a preliminary injunction will resume on Oct 20th. If the court issues a preliminary injunction, then the NCAA will appeal. They now have a pretty strong track record of getting these preliminary injunctions stayed. So, it won't be surprising if Dent becomes ineligible at some point during the season.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:39 pm to purplengold1
They really need to add to the Save college sports law that it becomes the exclusive domain of federal courts.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:48 pm to xtremecouture23
Could we ever get to a place where some players are eligible in one state, but not eligible in another state??
This whole situation is insane
This whole situation is insane
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:50 pm to TheRouxGuru
Having to have discussions like this during preseason camp is full on ridiculous. The NCAA has made a shite show of college athletics. To be ruled eligible temporarily and then have that revoked mid-season is assinine
Posted on 10/3/26 at 6:04 am to Shaq4prez
quote:Agreed
Having to have discussions like this during preseason camp is full on ridiculous.
quote:Ummm
The NCAA has made a shite show of college athletics. To be ruled eligible temporarily and then have that revoked mid-season is assinine
Look, I want LSU to have as good a team as possible, just like everyone else. But the NCAA isn't the one making this a shitshow, they're simply trying to maintain rules of eligibility. If you're trying to get someone who needs a court order to allow him to play, then you're the one making things crazy. It is what it is.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 6:24 am to Scoob
quote:
Look, I want LSU to have as good a team as possible, just like everyone else. But the NCAA isn't the one making this a shitshow
The way 5 for 5 was handled was a shitshow. Drug on for months, initial reports were that it would apply to 2022, some bluebloods cried about that, so it was changed last minute. Yes, the NCAA invited all this litigation over 5 for 5.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 6:27 am to xtremecouture23
Don’t think thats accurate. Clark dismissed his claims in the California case to join the Kentucky case. He might be protected by the TRO, but likely won’t be under any preliminary injunction as he is no longer a party to that case.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:09 am to Scoob
quote:
Ummm
Look, I want LSU to have as good a team as possible, just like everyone else. But the NCAA isn't the one making this a shitshow, they're simply trying to maintain rules of eligibility. If you're trying to get someone who needs a court order to allow him to play, then you're the one making things crazy. It is what it is.
If the NCAA would have originally included everyone in the five for five, then this would not be happening. Full disclosure, I don't even know what the hell the rules are with internationals and frankly, I don't have the bandwidth to care or pay attention. It'll be an accomplishment if I learn their names by SEC play
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:16 am to Scoob
quote:They changed the rules mid-game and have had selective enforcement of rules and began enforcing some rules that were new additions as well.
But the NCAA isn't the one making this a shitshow, they're simply trying to maintain rules of eligibility.
The timing of 5-5 was inexcusable. The players losing eligibility had until March 26th to either enter the portal and sit idly by without any current eligibility remaining - or - make a business decision such as NFL/NBA tryouts.
Then 3 months later the NCAA enacts 5-5 and says players that entered the portal and sat idly for 3 months get another year, but the players that thought their eligibility was done and tried out for professional teams would not be eligible. The NCAA could have simply grandfathered those players in, and problem solved. Instead of being the adults in the room, they started a whole clusterfrick of causing players to seek court orders in hopes of protecting their interests.
frick the NCAA.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:37 am to Shaq4prez
quote:This is where a lot of the selective eligibility decisions have been. The NCAA MBB uneducated see LSU trying to sign them and think it’s ridiculous, not understanding that international players have been a piece of MBB for a long time. The NCAA mostly ignored any eligibility criteria, until of course, this year. The NCAA again just doing NCAA things to muck everything up. Everything they’re trying to selectively enforce the year, by default with the new rules, get reset next season with clear eligibility rules. Instead of just be smart and letting this season play out like previous seasons, they decide to be idiots, causing all of this.
Full disclosure, I don't even know what the hell the rules are with internationals and frankly, I don't have the bandwidth to care or pay attention.
Again, none of this chaos is even a thought next season, all the rules for 5-5 and international age eligibility, etc. become set and none of this court bullshite is even considered. All the NCAA had to do was sit tight.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:51 am to drizztiger
quote:
The timing of 5-5 was inexcusable. The players losing eligibility had until March 26th to either enter the portal and sit idly by without any current eligibility remaining - or - make a business decision such as NFL/NBA tryouts.
Was 5-5 known to be coming down the pipe on or before 3/26? I don’t remember timeframe of when the talks about 5-5 started.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:03 am to ThighMeat
Google AI says 5-5 first made public early April.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:04 am to ThighMeat
quote:It is my understanding that there were talks prior to 3/26 and 5-5 was likely to be adopted at some point, but most thought it could take up to close to a year.
Was 5-5 known to be coming down the pipe on or before 3/26? I don’t remember timeframe of when the talks about 5-5 started.
However, there were some players that were advised to enter the portal by their agents, etc., but not every player received that advice, which makes it all the worse. Again, all the NCAA had to do was grandfather those players (2022 incoming class) and none of the would even exist. Incoming 2021 class already expired eligibility as a whole and incoming 2023 is already included in the 5-5.
The NCAA is basically trying to punish players that tried to get jobs playing ball because they thought their eligibility had expired - otherwise they would have stayed in college - while giving that eligibility to players that didn’t try to get jobs playing ball.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:12 am to ThighMeat
quote:It was enacted on 6/23 (apologies I had 6/26 stuck in my head, but just double checked), but the idea had been tossed prior to 3/26, hence the reason some players that were out of eligibility still entered the transfer portal. There would be zero reason to do that otherwise. I’m sure there were some agents with clients that had zero chance of professional opportunity advised them to enter the portal and we’ll just see what happens.
Google AI says 5-5 first made public early April.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:14 am to ellessuuuu
quote:
Don’t think thats accurate. Clark dismissed his claims in the California case to join the Kentucky case.
Glancey v. NCAA: Skyy Clark was an original plaintiff, but voluntarily dismissed his case. (No. 26CV498334, Santa Clara Superior Court (California state court), Judge Beth A.R. McGowen) LINK
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News