- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Six Games in - Business Decision
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:06 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:06 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Can we give him time to recruit at least one full class in normal circumstances and get them in the building?
I hear you, but his players have nothing to do with not deferring, passing up points, not fixing special teams coverage, and going for it in 4th and 10 on their own side of the ball.
It was a bad game from a coaching perspective.
Forgot also not playing one the best players on the team in Perkins.
This post was edited on 10/10/22 at 7:11 pm
0
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:19 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
This is so dumb I don’t even know where to start
There were four sentences in the quote. Pick one and start there. Surely you're smart enough to do that.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:25 pm to AlwysATgr
I guess Brennan was not healthy enough to compete? No way to know, but he is way ahead of JD5 in deciphering a defense and putting the ball on the money. JD5 has 30+ starts and is performing poorly. How much more time does the man need? I really am getting an eery CLM vibe about this struggling offense.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:26 pm to briano22
quote:
If you’re doing that then look at wr play and look at separation those receivers got then vs now. It’s so many different scenarios that make JD better for this system. Play calling is different. Route running is different.
Refresher course - we had one starter (Marshall) and one with some experience (Racey). Gilbert and Kayshon were true Fr. Jaray had played sparingly.
We have a better WR corps now than then. It's not OL, WRs, etc.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:46 pm to WDAIII
quote:
Brennan looked smooth. I’d give anything for him to be here right now
JD and Denbrock have me missing Peetz and Max Johnson. The feeling is mutual, baw.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:49 pm to AlwysATgr
Second year with the same basic offensive scheme, and an O-line that allowed seemingly more protection than this current O-line provides—BTW he was still sacked 9 times in the 3 games.
QBing this team this year was not in his best interest health wise or NFL-aspiration wise. If he’s talented enough he can dip his toes in the NFL waters.
QBing this team this year was not in his best interest health wise or NFL-aspiration wise. If he’s talented enough he can dip his toes in the NFL waters.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:53 pm to AlwysATgr
Greatness!
Posted on 10/10/22 at 7:57 pm to Pickett29
If true, shame on BK.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 8:01 pm to AlwysATgr
Y’all are assuming MB wants to play football
Maybe the guy came to the realization that he wasn’t going to play pro or didn’t want to play pro ball. If you don’t love football anymore it’s hard to compete at that level. You have to eat, sleep, and breath it to be a QB in the SEC or pros.
Maybe the guy came to the realization that he wasn’t going to play pro or didn’t want to play pro ball. If you don’t love football anymore it’s hard to compete at that level. You have to eat, sleep, and breath it to be a QB in the SEC or pros.
Posted on 10/10/22 at 10:35 pm to WaWaWeeWa
You may be right. IDK the real answer.
It may have been his health, lack of interest, regressed from 2Ys off, CBK wasn't up front, or some combination thereof.
But what he displayed in his last game action was >>>> than anything we've seen through six games.
It may have been his health, lack of interest, regressed from 2Ys off, CBK wasn't up front, or some combination thereof.
But what he displayed in his last game action was >>>> than anything we've seen through six games.
Posted on 10/11/22 at 12:24 am to atltiger6487
"This board has given Brennan way too much credit"
He wouldn't have survived in this offense, behind this OL. O line was even worse when Brennan played and still threw for 300 plus and put points on the board. Please!! Go look at the man's highlights and tell me if you have seen Daniel's make any of those throws or even tried. That was only his first 3 games playing as a starter. Imagine if he had more games under him.
He wouldn't have survived in this offense, behind this OL. O line was even worse when Brennan played and still threw for 300 plus and put points on the board. Please!! Go look at the man's highlights and tell me if you have seen Daniel's make any of those throws or even tried. That was only his first 3 games playing as a starter. Imagine if he had more games under him.
Posted on 10/11/22 at 12:29 am to briano22
"You can’t honestly think that MB would be better after seeing how this line plays. JD is there bc he can make plays with his feet".
Please go back and look at his highlights and throws as well as that horrible OL he did it with and stop making stupid comments when the film says it all!!
Please go back and look at his highlights and throws as well as that horrible OL he did it with and stop making stupid comments when the film says it all!!
Posted on 10/11/22 at 12:35 am to briano22
Message
Six Games in - Business Decision by briano22
"If you’re doing that then look at wr play and look at separation those receivers got then vs now. It’s so many different scenarios that make JD better for this system. Play calling is different. Route running is different. I’m not saying it’s a good thing. I wish we had a competent qb but JD is better for what we got going"
Yeah!go look at the receivers that weren't open and still scored touchdowns!! Open or not he atleast gave them a chance to make plays. Many times he threw the ball before the receiver even finished their route and got it to them. That's the big difference!!!
Six Games in - Business Decision by briano22
"If you’re doing that then look at wr play and look at separation those receivers got then vs now. It’s so many different scenarios that make JD better for this system. Play calling is different. Route running is different. I’m not saying it’s a good thing. I wish we had a competent qb but JD is better for what we got going"
Yeah!go look at the receivers that weren't open and still scored touchdowns!! Open or not he atleast gave them a chance to make plays. Many times he threw the ball before the receiver even finished their route and got it to them. That's the big difference!!!
Posted on 10/11/22 at 2:30 am to Alvin3176
quote:
I do believe we would be undefeated or atleast scored points with Tennessee if Brennan was our QB. BK really messed that up!!!
While it’s true Brennan would make throws Daniels cannot or will not make, Brennan would be cannon fodder for sacks in the pocket behind a hodgepodged offensive line. Pros and cons to both I suppose
Posted on 10/11/22 at 10:07 am to BrohanDavey
quote:
Brennan would be cannon fodder for sacks in the pocket behind a hodgepodged offensive line. Pros and cons to both I suppose
You think the '20 OL three games in was that much better than '22?
Posted on 10/11/22 at 10:53 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Maybe the guy came to the realization that he wasn’t going to play pro or didn’t want to play pro ball.
lulz
He played for 6 years, and then the days before our mobile QB was named the starter, that convinced him that he didnt have the heart for it anymore
Most people quit something long term (like a job) when they realize they dont want to work for idiots anymore
Posted on 10/11/22 at 11:19 am to BrohanDavey
quote:Do you know that Daniels is among the nation's leaders in getting sacked? He is skinnier than Brennan and risks more hits with his runs, which have been more or less in check of late.
While it’s true Brennan would make throws Daniels cannot or will not make, Brennan would be cannon fodder for sacks in the pocket behind a hodgepodged offensive line. Pros and cons to both I suppose
Posted on 10/11/22 at 11:44 am to White Tiger
What most of y’all are overlooking is that Brennan today is most likely not near the player he was then. He suffered 2 straight season ending injuries, one of which could have been career ending. Kelly talked him into staying so he obviously wanted to give him a chance. Everything logical points to him being physically diminished and no longer that guy but the rant has to always build up the guy or guys who aren’t playing or aren’t available.
This post was edited on 10/11/22 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/11/22 at 11:52 am to Gus007
quote:
Don't know what Denbrock and Kelly saw, but it's scary, disappointing that we let him go and kept Daniels.
Or maybe, just maybe, brennan wasnt the same after the injuries????
Posted on 10/11/22 at 8:57 pm to AlwysATgr
LET IT GO. BRENNAN IS LONG GONE
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News