Started By
Message

Since Playoff is likely to expand to 12 teams does LSU need to beef up its non-conference?

Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:46 pm
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:46 pm
LSU's future schedule

2021: @ucla
2022:Florida state (Nola)
2023:Florida state (orlando)
2024:UCLA
2025:@clemson
2026:Clemson
2027:@oklahoma
2028:Oklahoma
2029: Arizona state
2030: @arizona state
2031:@utah
2032:utah

If you schedule some one more non conference game you might be able to lose 3 regular season games and still get in the expanded playoff.


ETA: for those calling me an idiot I guess saban and smart are idiots as well.

This is Alabama future non conference schedule:


2021: Miami
2022: Texas
2023: Texas and USF
2024: USF and Wisconsin
2025: Florida State and Wisconsin
2026: West Virginia and Florida state
2027: West Virginia and OHio st
2028: Ohio st and OKlahoma st
2029: Oklahoma st and ND
2030: GT and ND
2031: Arizona and OU
2032: Arizona and OU
2033: VT and Boston College

This is UGA future non conference schedule

2021: Clemson
2022: Oregon
2023: OU
2024: Clemson
2025: UCLA
2026: UCLA and Louisville
2027: Florida st and Louisville
2028: Texas and FSU
2029: Texas and Clemson
2030: Clemson and Ohio St
2031: Ohio st and Oklahoma
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 5:03 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84094 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:47 pm to
Why would we want to make it harder to finish in the top 12
?
Posted by whichyalnoaboutseven
Metairie
Member since Dec 2009
2027 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:48 pm to
If anything we should cancel some of those games
Posted by LSUTIGERS8181
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2012
10015 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:48 pm to
I don’t think anyone in their right mind keeps a one loss and even possibly a 2 loss LSU out of a 12 team playoff
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 3:53 pm
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21309 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:48 pm to
If anything it needs to cancel every hard non con game it has scheduled. We're a playoff lock with 10 wins every year.

ETA: They need to mandate that At Large bids can only go to teams who schedule 2+ Power 5 OOC games.
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 3:50 pm
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63313 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:49 pm to
That seems like the opposite logic for an SEC team.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84857 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:50 pm to
No if anything we probably should water it down as the teams you’re going to be compared to for those last spots are almost certainly either other SEC teams already on your schedule or a 11-1/10-2 PAC-12 or Big-12 team with very few quality opponents.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28344 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Why would we want to make it harder to finish in the top 12
?


Just like in basketball and baseball I assume the strength of schedule will become a bigger factor. That is a three loss team who played a very tough schedule might be deemed more deserving of a spot than a 1 or 2 loss team that played a shitty non-conf schedule.

That said, I think 12 teams is too many. 6 would have been fine with a max of 8. That amount would still allow the regular season to be very important, but also give more teams a chance to bounce back from an early loss. It keeps more fans interested later in the season.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98988 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 6:00 pm to
We need to reschedule Texas so they can come to Baton Rouge for their well deserved whipping.
Posted by Hydrilla Gorilla
North Shore
Member since May 2017
1442 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

you might be able to lose 3 regular season games and still get in the expanded playoff

Posted by Coach1111
Brandon MS
Member since Nov 2019
59 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:16 pm to
Could be a Howard vs. Manning game in 2025.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13967 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Just like in basketball and baseball I assume the strength of schedule will become a bigger factor.


Strength of schedule is already a big factor. Going from four teams to twelve makes it easier to get in, not harder.

This thread makes no sense.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89527 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

I don’t think anyone in their right mind keeps a one loss and even possibly a 2 loss LSU out of a 12 team playoff




I think any "upper" tier 2-loss SEC team (LSU, Bama, Auburn, Florida, UGA, aTM makes a 12-team playoff. The SEC will have 4 or 5 unless they cap it - regularly.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13967 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

I think any "upper" tier 2-loss SEC team (LSU, Bama, Auburn, Florida, UGA, aTM makes a 12-team playoff.


Easily. LSU made it into the top 2 with two losses.

ETA: in the safe space/equity world we live in now there will be a couple “set aside” spots for the UCFs & Boises of the world, but 10 real teams is still a large expansion.
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 8:36 pm
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:20 pm to
This post reminds me of quite a few of your political posts

Retarded
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
2290 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Just like in basketball and baseball I assume the strength of schedule will become a bigger factor. That is a three loss team who played a very tough schedule might be deemed more deserving of a spot than a 1 or 2 loss team that played a shitty non-conf schedule. That said, I think 12 teams is too many. 6 would have been fine with a max of 8. That amount would still allow the regular season to be very important, but also give more teams a chance to bounce back from an early loss. It keeps more fans interested later in the season.

I’m shocked at the number of people that want to keep the playoff number low which is exactly the wrong way to add significance to the regular season. Why do you think every other league (nfl, nba, college baseball, college basketball, etc) has significantly more playoff participants. 12 will probably still be too low.
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 10:58 pm
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20321 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

I don’t think anyone in their right mind keeps a one loss and even possibly a 2 loss LSU out of a 12 team playoff



What happens when you have perennial one or two loss Bama, Auburn, USC, Texas, Texas A&M, etc etc constantly bobbing around one of those at-large spots…?
Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
11335 posts
Posted on 6/11/21 at 6:03 am to
You are a dumb frick
Posted by ArcticTiger
North Pole
Member since Nov 2018
1738 posts
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:01 am to
I dont think you need to do anything with non-conference. However, I think it would be an improvement if they went to a 9 game schedule.
Posted by sml71
Run if you hear banjos.
Member since Dec 2005
4310 posts
Posted on 6/11/21 at 7:08 am to
Not a fan.

The distance between a no 4 team and a no 12 team is vast. You simply aren’t going to see a no 12 Cinderella run through a bracket busting natty run. Not in football.

Meanwhile, this is going to start a slide towards eliminating conference championship games (or at least towards minimizing them).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram