- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rewatching the game Jayce brown
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:16 am
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:16 am
Was kind of underwhelming at receiver . He struggled creating seperation and getting off the line vs press. It’s just game one and maybe he’ll improve throughout the season but I see no reason why he would be ahead of Phillip wright in the wr pecking order
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:16 am to Cd104
clemson actually has an ok secondary. this keeps getting overlooked because everything else was so bad
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:18 am to Cd104
Watson
Green
Wilson
Those are your top 3. I think the rest are all good players and will rotate in, but those 3 will be your regular pass catchers.
Green
Wilson
Those are your top 3. I think the rest are all good players and will rotate in, but those 3 will be your regular pass catchers.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:33 am to RB10
quote:
Watson
Green
Wilson
Watkins, right?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:35 am to geauxtigers87
The Clemson secondary made some plays. The pick was a really good athletic play, they also had a couple of really good pass breakups.
Their D has talent for sure and we just kinda broke their D by being more physical and the fact our D was stuffing their o in a locker.
Clemson is probably a 8-4 type team because it’s D against worse teams will have a chance to keep them in it.
Their D has talent for sure and we just kinda broke their D by being more physical and the fact our D was stuffing their o in a locker.
Clemson is probably a 8-4 type team because it’s D against worse teams will have a chance to keep them in it.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:36 am to mdomingue
It is early and could change. They will give Harris more opportunity to see if he can produce. Phillip Wright does something good when in the game, and should get more pt.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:37 am to Cd104
Clemson’s corners were better than LSU’s WRs on Saturday.
Hopefully the WR group can improve.
I trust Lane and Weis to scheme it up.
Hopefully the WR group can improve.
I trust Lane and Weis to scheme it up.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:41 am to Cd104
Clemson’s secondary is good. Ashton Hampton is a prototypical LSU style cb1 that is really good in press man. Dude is big and fast.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:43 am to reynard
quote:
Clemson’s secondary is good. Ashton Hampton is a prototypical LSU style cb1 that is really good in press man. Dude is big and fast.
Hampton is def a hell of a player. Jackson Harris actually got open agaisnt him on his 32 yard gain in the 3rd. I know he had some bad drops earlier but he showed some really good flashes of being able to get open and create explosive plays
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:44 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Their D has talent for sure and we just kinda broke their D by being more physical and the fact our D was stuffing their o in a locker.
On paper their defense is pretty good. It will be interesting to see how the rest of their season pans out.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:45 am to RB10
Wright’s speed should earn him more touches. He also made a nice catch on sideline from Longstreet
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:59 am to Cd104
quote:
Was kind of underwhelming at receiver . He struggled creating seperation and getting off the line vs press. It’s just game one and maybe he’ll improve throughout the season but I see no reason why he would be ahead of Phillip wright in the wr pecking order
He struggles with drops. Even in warm ups he was dropping passes. I watched his highlights from last season and he never looks comfortable catching the ball, bobbles a lot. Needs 10,000 reps on the jug machine like Coach Brady used to do.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 9:00 am
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:02 am to skullhawk
quote:
Hopefully the WR group can improve.
I trust Lane and Weis to scheme it up.
I don't think it's talent. We don't have a lot of length in the WR corps.
Watkins, Wilson and Brown are all under 6'. Only a few of the receivers in the 3 deep are above 6'.
I thought Herbstreit mentioned it during the game and might have mentioned that we're limited in the type of receiver Kiffin/Weiss prefer for the deep throws.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:14 am to Cd104
I totally agree with OP. If Wright looked better, play him. Watkins was good and the other 2 weren't. Timing can get better but just because they were a good get in the portal doesn't mean they'll produce for us. If they can't get open let's move on.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:29 am to JohnnyU
quote:
Watkins, Wilson and Brown are all under 6'. Only a few of the receivers in the 3 deep are above 6'. I thought Herbstreit mentioned it during the game and might have mentioned that we're limited in the type of receiver Kiffin/Weiss prefer for the deep throws.
Def limited. there was almost no separation on the outside on Saturday.
The WR group isn't a strength of this team but as the game wore on, you could start to see how the scheme just gets guys open. In those situations it doesn't matter much if you have a first round receiver or an udfa which is why Lane and Glasscock don't believe in paying big money to a WR1.
I'd assume the gotta have it throws are going to Green. Leavitt used his legs on several of those plays Saturday. Clemson for whatever reason didn't spy him much which was a horrible gameplan.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:39 am to skullhawk
quote:
Clemson for whatever reason didn't spy him much which was a horrible gameplan.
Well, I know on a few of Leavitts good runs there was pressure right in his face and he eluded it and made good runs. Clemson had guys there a few times but they just straight up couldn’t get a hold of Leavitt. Leavitt can juke you and make you look silly.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:46 am to JohnnyU
quote:
I don't think it's talent. We don't have a lot of length in the WR corps.
Watkins, Wilson and Brown are all under 6'. Only a few of the receivers in the 3 deep are above 6'.
I thought Herbstreit mentioned it during the game and might have mentioned that we're limited in the type of receiver Kiffin/Weiss prefer for the deep throws.
Good point. If you look at the height of the 2027 WR class coming in they are all 6' 2" or taller. Lane and Wiess gonna fix that issue.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:49 am to Big4SALTbro
The pick was a gift that anyone could make.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:33 pm to OLDBEACHCOMBER
Nah it was a good play adjusting to our wr dropping it. Plenty of times where defenders miss the pick on that play.
The Clemson D will be fine against pretty much anyone else on their schedule.
The Clemson D will be fine against pretty much anyone else on their schedule.
Popular
Back to top
6










