Started By
Message

re: Rewatching 2011 season. Dinosaurian Offense

Posted on 5/12/19 at 1:57 am to
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 1:57 am to
quote:

Special teams and field position were our best friends that season. We averaged less total yards than 2018 but were more efficient. But we usually had great field position


It was all about efficiency until we met a Defense that was as good if not better than ours, they knew every play and we had a RT and a QB who never showed up and whose minds were on planet X for all we knew. Predictable but it worked. If a team has dominance on the lines and an incredible defense and STs to back it up I have no problem with the attitude 'stop us if you can."

Les lost the opportunity to compete for championships when he could never elevate the QB position from flat line and could no longer get the five star studs on OL and DL at the same level as Bama's. Or, just not the depth of talent the competition could accumulate. It was time for him to go and nothing left to be said on that matter.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 1:59 am
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31016 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 1:58 am to
quote:

About what?



I wasn't responding to you, now was I?


I've already told you I'm done talking to you for the night. There's no point in talking to you. Go bother someone else.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 2:30 am
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31016 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 1:59 am to
quote:

Great for moral victories I guess.



Consolation prizes! Even better.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261492 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:00 am to
quote:

have no problem with the attitude 'stop us if you can."


It's not bad if you can do something else when you have to. It seems rated catching up in the UGA game. Think we had 30 yards passing.

But it worked fine until the SECCG and NCG.

We had a reverse prob this year. We couldn't run when it was on the line
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 2:01 am
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10095 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:25 am to
quote:

Wow! You're paranoid
Not really.
You didn't start the thread, but if the subject of this topic, 2011 offense, was so bad, why hasn't it been bettered?
Being Dinosaurian and all that, it should be easy to top just one of the 4 best scoring offenses in LSU history(per LSU Media Guide)?
I do hope to see one supplanted soon, but facts are, plenty of Xbox theory and no results.....so far.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:28 am to
quote:

We haven’t attacked their weakness. Wtf?? 

Fournette got killed running. Into 9-10 man boxes. Oooohhhhh let’s run toss dive (worst play in football) 40 times. Same with Guice. We played to their strength and we did it almost every year under miles.



the last time we had a lead against bama,miles was the coach
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:30 am to
quote:

59th in total offense isn't on the list of worse LSU offenses.


you just posted about short field position and then used TOTAL yards as your measuring stat?
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10095 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:32 am to
quote:

if you can do something else when you have to
upvote this
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10095 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 2:36 am to
quote:

you just posted about short field position and then used TOTAL yards as your measuring stat?
My problem with TO is this, and negates any efficiency. It's really a shite stat, especially with the explosion of hunh.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 3:25 am to
quote:

My problem with TO is this, and negates any efficiency. It's really a shite stat, especially with the explosion of hunh.

its severely skewed towards HUNH teams.

team a has 500 yards on 80 plays
team b has 499 yards on 60 plays.


total says team a was more productive but team b was actually the more productive offense when the ball was snapped.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47992 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 3:48 am to
Yards per play is a more precise stat when it comes to offensive production. Teams with great defenses don’t normally have huge total yards stats because they’re getting the ball with much better field position and they’re also grinding out leads late in games as where teams with bad defenses get a lot of garbage time yardage because they’re throwing 20 passes in the 4th quarter alone. Yards per play, touchdowns, pass efficiency and points per possession are more telling than total offense. I’d much rather have a team that throws for 3,000 yards averages 9 yards per attempt and 30 TDs 7 INTs with a run game that averages almost 6 yards per carry with 30 TDs than an offense that throws for 5,000 yards on 6.8 ypa with 45TDs and 18 INTs with 4.9 ypc rushing and 15 TDs.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 3:52 am
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47531 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 3:59 am to
quote:

Fournette got killed running. Into 9-10 man boxes. Oooohhhhh let’s run toss dive (worst play in football) 40 times. Same with Guice. We played to their strength and we did it almost every year under miles.

I'll never ever understand why Miles would never try putting #5 and #7 in the backfield. He bullshitted us about risk to a star back, extra blocker blah blah
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 4:05 am
Posted by FUBAR
USA
Member since Sep 2004
4442 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 5:26 am to
Ah, the offense of Les Miles when a pass to the tight end or a running back was considered a trick play
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9356 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 8:39 am to
12-0>>>9-3 by my math, maybe you learned that new math?

Maybe you are happy with pretty losses?

If we had burrow, Flynn , matt mauck, the offense would have looked sexier, and maybe 14-0 instead of 13-1.

Maybe? Our fing Olive got killed in the Mulligan game especially the tackles
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4339 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 8:45 am to
Yep in 2010 thru 2012 we were dominant on the line of,scrimmage. Very much like Bama. Had we had a QB we could have played for,three NCs instead of one.

We have not been dominant on the line of scrimmage since 2012. In addition Bama has moved forward and increased the talent gap and opened up the offense.

We have probably closed the talent gap from a chasm to just a gap at this point. But we are still outclasses on the LOS. Burrow is much better than JJ and Jarrett Lee back in the day. But Bama has Tua.. even better. Bama has multiple 4 and 5 star RB and better WR than we do. LSU probably better at DB. Other than that Bama leads LSU at every position group.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14012 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 8:54 am to
quote:

We have probably closed the talent gap from a chasm to just a gap at this point.


Bama has 7-8 potential first-round picks for 2020.

quote:

LSU probably better at DB.


Three of the potential first rounders are DBs.


LINK
Posted by ShawSawTheMoor
China Grove, Brazoria Co. TX FM 521
Member since Apr 2019
333 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:08 am to
quote:

was no slouch as many imply

It was servicable, although not great. The strengths of that team were special teams and defense, not offense.

Jarrett Lee and Jordan Jefferson performed well (mostly on short fields) and the redzone TD production that year was superb.

It should be noted that LSU was +20 in turnover margin in 2011. Let me repeat: +20. That's the best I've ever seen in this department; it turns an age-old adage completely on its head: the best OFFENSE is a good DEFENSE.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 9:16 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261492 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:19 am to
quote:

It's really a shite stat,


Noted for future reference
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41293 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:22 am to
Total yards is not meaningless but it also isn’t a great indicator of efficiency which is really what I think is more important.

There are bunch of teams in the top 40 of total offenses every year that are hovering around .500 because they put up style yards on patsies, give up 700 yards on defense and can’t get crucial yards to win games when they need to.

Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14012 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:25 am to
Another thread where Ricky and his merry band of lemmings regurgitate the same arguments without acknowledging that Miles left a gaping hole in the offense with his 2016 recruiting class.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram