- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NIL good for Will Wade “investigation”
Posted on 7/30/21 at 6:10 pm to Elleshoe
Posted on 7/30/21 at 6:10 pm to Elleshoe
LSU hasn’t even received a notice of allegation lol. Wade and Smart were both cleared over 2 years ago of these same rumors that continue to be recycled by the media, nothing new has even been alleged. ESPN, Dick Vitale and Pat Forde have no power to investigate LSU and they’re the only ones pretending like this is happening other than the gullible fans who believe whatever they read on the Internet.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 6:24 pm to extremetigerfanatic
quote:
Dude. You’re not that naive right?
Me saying that it's illegal for a coach to offer players money is not me saying that I think coaches don't offer players money. Maybe reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 6:25 pm to Likeadog
Worked for Reggie Bush. No, wait. Maybe, it didn’t
Posted on 7/30/21 at 6:27 pm to Madking
quote:
The NIL is already being violated by a lot of these deals
When did I say anything that even suggested how I felt about if NIL was being used properly or not?
I simply pointed out to the OP that the claims against Wade had nothing to do with NIL. They are two different things.
This post was edited on 7/30/21 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 7/30/21 at 7:37 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
You think coaches aren’t using NIL to arrangement for payment of players?
Fixed.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 8:08 pm to TigerLunatik
Espn hit piece from a year ago. LSU has not received any notice of allegation. The alleged documents are nowhere to be found in that article but they continue to quote a twice convicted felon which is the actual source of all these smear articles.
This post was edited on 7/30/21 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 7/30/21 at 8:20 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Keep dreaming. They're not gonna retroactively apply a new rule to an investigation that began before the new rule was put in place.
Why would they? It would be like charging someone with possession of marijuana after it’s legalized even if the ‘crime’ happened before it was legal.
The investigation will continue to cost money for them to maybe penalize a guy for doing something which is now ok. What’s the point?
Posted on 7/30/21 at 8:24 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
You think it's legal for a coach to arrange payment for a player to go to school?
Some of you really need to look up what NIL is.
The point is that if NIL were in place the “strong arse offer” would just come from a middle man business. Technically what Wade potentially did is still against the rules but it it’s so easy to get around that it’s essentially ok. Like you think Bryce Young just suddenly started getting money for being a prize recruit? $800k+ for a guy that’s taken a few snaps. No, it’s just now the bagmen can be out in the open.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 8:31 pm to Sir Fury
Boosters can pay player as long as it is set up to comply with NIl. Cant say here is 10 grand to sign.
Can probably say when you come here I will give you a sponsorship deal for my company to use your NIL for advertising for 10,000
Can probably say when you come here I will give you a sponsorship deal for my company to use your NIL for advertising for 10,000
Posted on 7/30/21 at 8:33 pm to MLCLyons
quote:
The point is that if NIL were in place the “strong arse offer” would just come from a middle man business
None of that is relevant. The point remains that if they had strong enough evidence against Wade, nothing with NIL would save him.
The fact is also out there that it's been years since all of this started, and not a damn thing has happened yet. You would think that if they had some strong evidence then the hammer would have been dropped.
You would have trouble finding a stronger Will Wade supporter than me on this board. I don't even care what happens, I want Wade still coaching at LSU. I think he's the best coach on campus. Me feeling that way doesn't change the fact that this OP is flat out wrong by saying one is like the other.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 9:11 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Keep dreaming. They're not gonna retroactively apply a new rule to an investigation that began before the new rule was put in place.
“They” aren’t going to exist very soon.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 9:13 pm to Likeadog
For starters, what Wade allegedly did will remain against the rules.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 9:36 pm to moneyg
quote:
“They” aren’t going to exist very soon.
Let's say that's true. Do you believe that the NCAA will no longer exist before they make a ruling on the case against LSU? That's the only way that what you posted would be relevant.
Posted on 7/30/21 at 10:24 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
quote:
nothing new has even been alleged
The NCAA says that Wade offered impermissible benefits to 11 recruits.
LINK
You continue to be one of the dumbest fricks on this board even when I try to give you the benefit of the doubt
Posted on 7/30/21 at 10:29 pm to Elleshoe
He said nothing has new has been alleged since over 2 years ago when Smart was cleared to play. Since then NCAA documents have reportedly said that Wade arranged payments to 11 players. What do you call that?
quote:
NCAA enforcement officials say LSU basketball coach Will Wade is suspected of offering or providing “impermissible benefits” to 11 prospective recruits or people associated with them.
This post was edited on 7/30/21 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 7/30/21 at 10:39 pm to Likeadog
Hire Whitehorse law firm and sue the shite out of them. Works for Auburn and bama
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:45 pm to Likeadog
Good. There are a lot of strong arse offers being made right now.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 3:05 am to TigerLunatik
Even if they rule but then aren't around to enforce it, does it matter? They have bigger concerns right now and, frankly, bringing the hammer down on a large school when those large schools are angling toward getting rid of them entirely would probably not be the best move, just reminds them why it is in their best interest to leave the NCAA and run it themselves.
Back to top


1




