Started By
Message

re: Landry being interviewed on ESPN right now by McAfee

Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:36 am to
Posted by tigerforever7
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
1204 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:36 am to
The first step from the LSU administration when reviewing the option of firing the head coach when a contract is still in place is to approach donors to see if the contract will be paid out by them. If the donors are not going to foot the bill, the coach would not be fired.

From what I have gathered, it didn’t take many calls to have the money guaranteed. And we’re talking guaranteed by a multi billionaire.

I wouldn’t worry much as a tax payer. There are very wealthy people that care a lot about LSU football. All these politicians and lawyers you have seen in media up in arms are either dumb or trying to advance career.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 11:40 am
Posted by jpainter6174
Boss city
Member since Feb 2014
6339 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:36 am to
quote:


Politics in sports....im out!


Well when the State has to potentially pay the buyout, frick yea.. Taxpayer money shouldn't be used for college sports.
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4902 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:37 am to
quote:

we all understand "IF" the donors didnt' pay then LSU would have to pay.


The way I understand it..."IF" the doners didn't pay buyouts Kelly would not have been fired...Hell, we might have stuck with Orgeron if buyouts came from the state/LSU budget. TAF and doners pay for it all and huge doners may even get a say, behind the scenes, in what happens.
Posted by timlan2057
In the Shadow of Tiger Stadium
Member since Sep 2005
19726 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Kiffin will be signed to a 5 year 40 mill contract. 5mil bonus if made playoffs. 15m bonus if win it all. I can see something like that


Kiffin and his agent would laugh at that, you fricking dumbass.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83740 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Every state university is going to have the same type of contract.
Taxpayers will never be paying for LSU athletics, and to say otherwise that they might is being disingenuous.


He made a valid point despite his inability to make the argument clearer. It is not disingenuous at all. If the donors wouldn't step up to foot the bill, LSU would be stuck with Kelly OR state dollars would have to pay the buyout. The contract was ridiculous and irresponsible.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65402 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Landry isnt really off base here


In theory, yes. But college football is and always will be an arms race where the path of more money and more generous contract terms is king. If you want the best, you have to offer something better than the other 50 schools that want him.

Good luck convincing an established coach to be a guinea pig in a new pay-for-performance contract structure when every other school is offering the old terms. This is how you end up with a severely underqualified coach.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 11:40 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88124 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

The way I understand it..."IF" the doners didn't pay buyouts Kelly would not have been fired


exactly
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27131 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

LSU is very unlikely to get a big name coach after all of this.


It has nothing to do with Landry and everything to do with the contract they are floating out there.

A performance-based contract isn't going to entice a coach who can get another program to guarantee them $100 million. No agent is going to advise their client to walk away from guaranteed money.

It is what it is. LSU will get an up-and-comer, and hopefully it works out. They may set a new trend in coaching compensation.
Posted by barbapapa
Member since Mar 2018
3805 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:41 am to
What a time to be alive
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83740 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:42 am to
And having such a long and guaranteed contract that can back you into a corner like this is irresponsible and bad business.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128036 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:42 am to
quote:


Kiffin will be signed to a 5 year 40 mill contract.

5mil bonus if made playoffs. 15m bonus if win it all.


Kiffin makes more now staying where he is. He could get a contract from OM tomorrow north of 12 mill per year, with a large buyout

And not have to meet any kind of incentives whatsoever

So why would he leave that for a much worse deal?

You people don't think
Posted by GulfSouthTiger
Member since Jun 2025
426 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Landry is making it clear he's using LSU sports to try and advance his political agenda.
Ironically it is ending his career. Can we impeach this tard?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128036 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

It has nothing to do with Landry and everything to do with the contract they are floating out there.

A performance-based contract isn't going to entice a coach who can get another program to guarantee them $100 million


I mean yes, but it has everything to do with Landry: He's the one mentioning a contract of that sort
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27131 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Kiffin will be signed to a 5 year 40 mill contract.

5mil bonus if made playoffs. 15m bonus if win it all.

I can see something like that


No agent is going to let their client sign a contract like that when another school is offering nine figures in guaranteed compensation.

I much prefer your idea, and that is how it should be, but that is not the reality we are currently in.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
19055 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Kiffin will be signed to a 5 year 40 mill contract. 5mil bonus if made playoffs. 15m bonus if win it all. I can see something like that


I think he makes more now
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
22121 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:43 am to
"We gon make a deal where the coach can be fired every year with no buyout AND if he doesn't get 10 wins he gets his pay docked!" That's Landry's idea of how we're going to attract a coach
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83740 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:44 am to
The reality is, LSU will not be doing some mostly incentive-based deal with the next coach. But the contract won't be a 10-year monster that's 90% guaranteed either.
Posted by Carter
Member since Nov 2003
3532 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:46 am to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128036 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:

The reality is, LSU will not be doing some mostly incentive-based deal with the next coach.


No shite, unless they want to hire North Texas's coach

quote:

But the contract won't be a 10-year monster that's 90% guaranteed either.



Jimmy Sexton and Trace Armstrong laugh in your general direction

You will, or you can start speaking Dan Mullen buddy
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65402 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:48 am to
quote:

It has nothing to do with Landry and everything to do with the contract they are floating out there.


Landry IS the one floating the contract out there
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram