
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Landon Clark!
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:51 am
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:51 am
Gonna be hard to keep him off the field if Leavitt continues to turn it over. Hes a bit of an upgrade from what I’ve seen from both so far.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:52 am to mattchewbocca
Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am to mattchewbocca
He didn’t really have a lot of attempts in garbage time. Its hard to make too many judgments on that. But I’m glad he did look comfortable.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 9:56 am
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am to mattchewbocca
nice release and accuracy. can run also.
his passes look better than sams.
what a good problem to have.
sam has issues placing ball where it needs to go,
dont need a rocket arm or dan marino release
but need accuracy and ball placement and have to read a D.
spurrier would not hesistate to bench a Qba nd chew his arse out and play the hot hand.
his passes look better than sams.
what a good problem to have.
sam has issues placing ball where it needs to go,
dont need a rocket arm or dan marino release
but need accuracy and ball placement and have to read a D.
spurrier would not hesistate to bench a Qba nd chew his arse out and play the hot hand.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:56 am to mattchewbocca
He’s def capable of winning game and management of offense. With our D ball protection field position is paramount.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:57 am to mattchewbocca
Longstreet will play before him
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:01 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!
no
fact is
this is the best Qb room we have had since 2003
mauck
flynn
russell
randall
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:02 am to CatsGoneWild
quote:
Longstreet will play before him
This has not been true through two games
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:03 am to CatsGoneWild
quote:
Longstreet will play before him
WRONG last 2 games
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:11 am to mattchewbocca
Lane started Austin at ole miss last year ahead of Trinidad until he got hurt. What’s the deal with that?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:12 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!
4 TO’s against a subpar team and you don’t believe this should be entertained?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:13 am to Fat Bastard
I like what I see so far from Landon Clark. More accurate passing than Leavitt and just as good, if not better, at running the ball. He's our future QB.
Off-topic, but important: will we see Longstreet again this season?
Off-topic, but important: will we see Longstreet again this season?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:27 am to mattchewbocca
I mean you dummies always calling for the back up qb! There is a reason he’s not the starter
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:32 am to mattchewbocca
Leavitt has thrown for 550+ yards, run for 150 yards with 7 total touchdowns in 2 games. Can we just let him play and enjoy watching a productive offense. Those int can happen to anyone. Just enjoy the ride and relax
On this int, Watkins was supposed to disrupt the DB and his effort was lacking
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. On this int, Watkins was supposed to disrupt the DB and his effort was lacking
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 10:36 am
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:32 am to mattchewbocca
Look, Clark did look good throwing the ball, but have you not seen time and time again that when you make the backup the starter, then suddenly under the pressure of being the starter, they look VERY average if not terrible?
First I want to see Clark get some meaningful snaps. Give him a series or 2 in the 1st half in a tight game. Then maybe they can start accurately evaluating whether he would be the better starter.
First I want to see Clark get some meaningful snaps. Give him a series or 2 in the 1st half in a tight game. Then maybe they can start accurately evaluating whether he would be the better starter.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:33 am to mattchewbocca
If Leavitt keeps this up and LC were to keep playing well, it might really test Lane's "we play the best player, not the highest paid" approach. I think he follows it for the most part, but that might really test him.
I'm not giving up on Sam yet and not going to anoint LC based on just playing against the backups, but Clark's throws seem to be a little more crisp and he also has running ability, though I don't believe he's as fast or elusive as Leavitt.
I'm not giving up on Sam yet and not going to anoint LC based on just playing against the backups, but Clark's throws seem to be a little more crisp and he also has running ability, though I don't believe he's as fast or elusive as Leavitt.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:41 am to TeygerFan
quote:
First I want to see Clark get some meaningful snaps. Give him a series or 2 in the 1st half in a tight game. Then maybe they can start accurately evaluating whether he would be the better starter.
they had all summer to evaluate them. By all accounts Clark looked lost against the LSU defense.
playing in the 4th quarter against LA Tech's and Clemsons backups is so meaningless there isn't much else to say. If you don't realize that you are a retard
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:45 am to mattchewbocca
You can say what you want, but he is a better passer than Leavitt at this point. I hope Leavitt shakes off the rust quickly.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:52 am to mattchewbocca
The best thing about Clark is that LSU has an insurance policy if Leavitt goes down. He seems very comfortable in Lane's offense.

Popular
Back to top

17







