Started By
Message

Landon Clark!

Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:51 am
Posted by mattchewbocca
houma, la
Member since Jun 2008
7005 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:51 am
Gonna be hard to keep him off the field if Leavitt continues to turn it over. Hes a bit of an upgrade from what I’ve seen from both so far.

LINK
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
7111 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:52 am to
Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45721 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:53 am to
Baw can spin it.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1569 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am to
He didn’t really have a lot of attempts in garbage time. Its hard to make too many judgments on that. But I’m glad he did look comfortable.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 9:56 am
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
93165 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:54 am to
nice release and accuracy. can run also.

his passes look better than sams.

what a good problem to have.

sam has issues placing ball where it needs to go,

dont need a rocket arm or dan marino release

but need accuracy and ball placement and have to read a D.

spurrier would not hesistate to bench a Qba nd chew his arse out and play the hot hand.

Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
19872 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:56 am to
He’s def capable of winning game and management of offense. With our D ball protection field position is paramount.
Posted by CatsGoneWild
Pigeon forge, Tennessee
Member since Jan 2008
15260 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:57 am to
Longstreet will play before him
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
93165 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!


no

fact is

this is the best Qb room we have had since 2003

mauck
flynn
russell
randall
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36749 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Longstreet will play before him


This has not been true through two games
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
93165 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Longstreet will play before him


WRONG last 2 games
Posted by Bigdawg13
Member since Aug 2024
26 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:11 am to
Lane started Austin at ole miss last year ahead of Trinidad until he got hurt. What’s the deal with that?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99421 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Our fan base is forever obsessed with the backup!


4 TO’s against a subpar team and you don’t believe this should be entertained?
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
32989 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:13 am to
I like what I see so far from Landon Clark. More accurate passing than Leavitt and just as good, if not better, at running the ball. He's our future QB.

Off-topic, but important: will we see Longstreet again this season?
Posted by Maverick14
Sulphur, La
Member since Aug 2014
4684 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:27 am to
I mean you dummies always calling for the back up qb! There is a reason he’s not the starter
Posted by SWLA92
SWLA
Member since Feb 2015
5281 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:32 am to
Leavitt has thrown for 550+ yards, run for 150 yards with 7 total touchdowns in 2 games. Can we just let him play and enjoy watching a productive offense. Those int can happen to anyone. Just enjoy the ride and relax
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

On this int, Watkins was supposed to disrupt the DB and his effort was lacking
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 10:36 am
Posted by TeygerFan
Member since Dec 2016
611 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:32 am to
Look, Clark did look good throwing the ball, but have you not seen time and time again that when you make the backup the starter, then suddenly under the pressure of being the starter, they look VERY average if not terrible?

First I want to see Clark get some meaningful snaps. Give him a series or 2 in the 1st half in a tight game. Then maybe they can start accurately evaluating whether he would be the better starter.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49666 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:33 am to
If Leavitt keeps this up and LC were to keep playing well, it might really test Lane's "we play the best player, not the highest paid" approach. I think he follows it for the most part, but that might really test him.

I'm not giving up on Sam yet and not going to anoint LC based on just playing against the backups, but Clark's throws seem to be a little more crisp and he also has running ability, though I don't believe he's as fast or elusive as Leavitt.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291957 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

First I want to see Clark get some meaningful snaps. Give him a series or 2 in the 1st half in a tight game. Then maybe they can start accurately evaluating whether he would be the better starter.



they had all summer to evaluate them. By all accounts Clark looked lost against the LSU defense.

playing in the 4th quarter against LA Tech's and Clemsons backups is so meaningless there isn't much else to say. If you don't realize that you are a retard
Posted by Tigerinthewoods
In the woods
Member since Oct 2009
1804 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:45 am to
You can say what you want, but he is a better passer than Leavitt at this point. I hope Leavitt shakes off the rust quickly.
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
16834 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 10:52 am to
The best thing about Clark is that LSU has an insurance policy if Leavitt goes down. He seems very comfortable in Lane's offense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram