- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyren Lacy’s attorney issues new statement in support of DA
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:00 am to lostinbr
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:00 am to lostinbr
quote:
She didn’t plow into the truck because she swerved onto the wrong side of the road.
According to the LSP on scene photos, she never left her lane. She just crossed the center line
And the accident was right at those telephone poles. The truck had pulled off at those poles, then drove to the gas station exit. Thats why you never see him prior to the crash. Its also the gap that Lacy drove thru when leaving the scene

Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:18 am to Chicken
There are several, you have to patch it together.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:15 am to ItTakesAThief
quote:
The DA impaneled the grand jury to avoid having to be the o e to make the decision because the DA is an elected position.
It has been said that the DA empaneled the GJ because of the death and resulting charges from that.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:01 am to RobbBobb
quote:
According to the LSP on scene photos, she never left her lane. She just crossed the center line
Based on what, the location of her rear tires? The other car’s rear tires are in a parking lot. Does that mean they were driving on the shoulder?
quote:
And the accident was right at those telephone poles. The truck had pulled off at those poles, then drove to the gas station exit.
You’re just making shite up at this point. You think he pulled back onto the road and drove all the way around the telephone poles in 1.5 seconds? At best he might have been hugging the line on the right.
The only evidence I’ve seen to indicate that the LSP narrative (that she swerved to avoid hitting Lacy head-on) is A) her own inconsistent statement and B) a witness statement supposedly from gold truck driver, signed “refused.” Meanwhile witnesses at the scene immediately stated that she swerved to avoid hitting the gold truck.
Honestly I’m over arguing about it.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:45 am to Adam Banks
quote:
Replace Kyren Lacy with someone’s lab running out on to the road 100 yards from the golf truck and the wreck still happens.
You just made my point.Thank you.
In the case you put forth the dog would be the catalyst that started yhe chain of events, and in the case at hand, Lacy was the catalyst. He is responsible for this whole thing starting and ending in a man's death.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:21 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
In the case you put forth the dog would be the catalyst that started yhe chain of events, and in the case at hand, Lacy was the catalyst.
The catalyst was someone eating Funyuns and not paying attention while speeding.
The fact that it could be any one of many everyday occurrences on the road shows that Kyren Lacy was not critical to the events that unfolded
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:22 am to Adam Banks
quote:
The fact that it could be any one of many everyday occurrences on the road shows that Kyren Lacy was not critical to the events that unfolded
He was the reason the events unfolded but he wasn’t critical because anything could have caused them to unfold!!!
A squirrel could have caused it!!! Or a duck!! A gator!!!! Coach O jogging shirtless in the street!!!
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:34 am to Adam Banks
quote:
The catalyst was someone eating Funyuns and not paying attention while speeding.
Wrong.
Catalyst:
1. a person or thing that precipitates an event.
2.a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change.
The “event” was the collision between Funyuns and the man. Kyren’s wreckless illegal driving precipitated the event
In the scientific sense of the word (2): Kyren was the “substance” that “increased the rate of chemical reaction”(chain of events resulting in crash), “without itself undergoing any permanent change”(was not physically involved in crash himself)
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:43 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
1. a person or thing that precipitates an event. 2.a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change.
The person and substance that precipitated the event was the person not paying attention to the road.
She was not obeying the law.
She wasn’t paying attention.
She hit the other car.
If she is obeying the law.
If she is paying attention.
No one gets hurt.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:54 am to Adam Banks
AI Overview: Yes, there can be more than one catalyst, including systems where two or more catalysts work cooperatively or in sequence to achieve a chemical reaction. These multi-catalytic systems are used to accelerate reaction rates, increase efficiency, and enable the synthesis of complex molecules. Examples include cooperative catalysis, where multiple catalysts activate different molecules that then react, and tandem catalysis, where a reaction sequence is catalyzed by a series of catalysts in a "one-pot" fashion.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:00 am to Lgrnwd
Did she get charged with negligent homicide?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:23 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Did she get charged with negligent homicide?
No, maybe she should have, maybe not. I would like to hear the reasoning why LSP did not consider her to be at fault enough to charge. Maybe they have a good reason, maybe not.
But the thing is, as of right now, the only reason people seem so sure Funyuns was negligent is because of how the information was presented by Lacy’s defense attorney. Of course he is going to slant everything in a way that puts more blame on someone other than his client, that is his job.
If Funyuns had a defense attorney he would be releasing information and slanting everything in a way making it look like Lacy was more at fault. And everyone would be even more confused right now.
People are losing sight of what the argument should be about right now. Given what the LSP and DA knew, was the charge of negligent homicide against LACY “unreasonable”? Ory basically painted a picture of LSP as being either incompetent, corrupt, racist or all of the above. That is a serious allegation.
I personally don’t like the charge of negligent homicide for what Lacy did. But considering the case was being sent to a Grand Jury, they would have the opportunity to dismiss the charges before it ever even went to trial.
Even though I don’t like the negligent homicide charge, given the evidence they had, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to send it to a Grand Jury and let them decide.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:40 pm to tiger91
quote:
Does it generally take that long between identifying the car/plate and identifying the driver? not that it’s important. I’m just curious.
On the surface, it would appear simple.
The vehicle was ID'd first thru the LPR's (Licensed Plate Readers). -
You can't arrest a vehicle, you must identify the driver.
This can be simple, "Yes I was driving my vehicle."
It can be more difficult, "No, I was not the driver of my vehicle at the time in question."
This is where the multiple LPR's (Licensed Plate Readers) come into play, along with cell phone tower pings, red light cameras and location services.
Once you identify locations where the car has been - you then match up vehicle & driver being at the same place.
Then look at business cameras, ring cameras, or any camera you can find that may have video of the driver & vehicle together.
Are the windows tinted? Gets a little more challenging.
No window tint, maybe camera places owner driving the vehicle at the time in question.
These can all be a time consuming process to get the info, then review hours of data & video.
It's not what the police know,,,,,it becomes what they can prove in court
Popular
Back to top


1









