Started By
Message

re: Kyren Lacy’s attorney issues new statement in support of DA

Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:00 am to
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33293 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:00 am to
quote:

She didn’t plow into the truck because she swerved onto the wrong side of the road.

According to the LSP on scene photos, she never left her lane. She just crossed the center line

And the accident was right at those telephone poles. The truck had pulled off at those poles, then drove to the gas station exit. Thats why you never see him prior to the crash. Its also the gap that Lacy drove thru when leaving the scene


Posted by andouille
A table near a waiter.
Member since Dec 2004
11374 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:18 am to
There are several, you have to patch it together.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20030 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:15 am to
quote:

The DA impaneled the grand jury to avoid having to be the o e to make the decision because the DA is an elected position.


It has been said that the DA empaneled the GJ because of the death and resulting charges from that.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12592 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:01 am to
quote:

According to the LSP on scene photos, she never left her lane. She just crossed the center line

Based on what, the location of her rear tires? The other car’s rear tires are in a parking lot. Does that mean they were driving on the shoulder?
quote:

And the accident was right at those telephone poles. The truck had pulled off at those poles, then drove to the gas station exit.

You’re just making shite up at this point. You think he pulled back onto the road and drove all the way around the telephone poles in 1.5 seconds? At best he might have been hugging the line on the right.

The only evidence I’ve seen to indicate that the LSP narrative (that she swerved to avoid hitting Lacy head-on) is A) her own inconsistent statement and B) a witness statement supposedly from gold truck driver, signed “refused.” Meanwhile witnesses at the scene immediately stated that she swerved to avoid hitting the gold truck.

Honestly I’m over arguing about it.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
14447 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:


Replace Kyren Lacy with someone’s lab running out on to the road 100 yards from the golf truck and the wreck still happens.


You just made my point.Thank you.
In the case you put forth the dog would be the catalyst that started yhe chain of events, and in the case at hand, Lacy was the catalyst. He is responsible for this whole thing starting and ending in a man's death.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36326 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:

In the case you put forth the dog would be the catalyst that started yhe chain of events, and in the case at hand, Lacy was the catalyst.



The catalyst was someone eating Funyuns and not paying attention while speeding.


The fact that it could be any one of many everyday occurrences on the road shows that Kyren Lacy was not critical to the events that unfolded


Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50622 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

The fact that it could be any one of many everyday occurrences on the road shows that Kyren Lacy was not critical to the events that unfolded




He was the reason the events unfolded but he wasn’t critical because anything could have caused them to unfold!!!

A squirrel could have caused it!!! Or a duck!! A gator!!!! Coach O jogging shirtless in the street!!!
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 10:24 am
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
8279 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:34 am to
quote:

The catalyst was someone eating Funyuns and not paying attention while speeding.


Wrong.

Catalyst:

1. a person or thing that precipitates an event.

2.a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change.

The “event” was the collision between Funyuns and the man. Kyren’s wreckless illegal driving precipitated the event

In the scientific sense of the word (2): Kyren was the “substance” that “increased the rate of chemical reaction”(chain of events resulting in crash), “without itself undergoing any permanent change”(was not physically involved in crash himself)
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36326 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

1. a person or thing that precipitates an event. 2.a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change.



The person and substance that precipitated the event was the person not paying attention to the road.


She was not obeying the law.

She wasn’t paying attention.


She hit the other car.




If she is obeying the law.


If she is paying attention.



No one gets hurt.


Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
8279 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:54 am to
AI Overview: Yes, there can be more than one catalyst, including systems where two or more catalysts work cooperatively or in sequence to achieve a chemical reaction. These multi-catalytic systems are used to accelerate reaction rates, increase efficiency, and enable the synthesis of complex molecules. Examples include cooperative catalysis, where multiple catalysts activate different molecules that then react, and tandem catalysis, where a reaction sequence is catalyzed by a series of catalysts in a "one-pot" fashion.

Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36326 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:00 am to
Did she get charged with negligent homicide?
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
8279 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Did she get charged with negligent homicide?


No, maybe she should have, maybe not. I would like to hear the reasoning why LSP did not consider her to be at fault enough to charge. Maybe they have a good reason, maybe not.

But the thing is, as of right now, the only reason people seem so sure Funyuns was negligent is because of how the information was presented by Lacy’s defense attorney. Of course he is going to slant everything in a way that puts more blame on someone other than his client, that is his job.

If Funyuns had a defense attorney he would be releasing information and slanting everything in a way making it look like Lacy was more at fault. And everyone would be even more confused right now.

People are losing sight of what the argument should be about right now. Given what the LSP and DA knew, was the charge of negligent homicide against LACY “unreasonable”? Ory basically painted a picture of LSP as being either incompetent, corrupt, racist or all of the above. That is a serious allegation.

I personally don’t like the charge of negligent homicide for what Lacy did. But considering the case was being sent to a Grand Jury, they would have the opportunity to dismiss the charges before it ever even went to trial.

Even though I don’t like the negligent homicide charge, given the evidence they had, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to send it to a Grand Jury and let them decide.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50622 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Lgrnwd


Posted by zuluboudreaux
God’s country USA
Member since Jan 2008
1049 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Does it generally take that long between identifying the car/plate and identifying the driver? not that it’s important. I’m just curious.


On the surface, it would appear simple.
The vehicle was ID'd first thru the LPR's (Licensed Plate Readers). -
You can't arrest a vehicle, you must identify the driver.
This can be simple, "Yes I was driving my vehicle."
It can be more difficult, "No, I was not the driver of my vehicle at the time in question."

This is where the multiple LPR's (Licensed Plate Readers) come into play, along with cell phone tower pings, red light cameras and location services.
Once you identify locations where the car has been - you then match up vehicle & driver being at the same place.
Then look at business cameras, ring cameras, or any camera you can find that may have video of the driver & vehicle together.

Are the windows tinted? Gets a little more challenging.
No window tint, maybe camera places owner driving the vehicle at the time in question.

These can all be a time consuming process to get the info, then review hours of data & video.

It's not what the police know,,,,,it becomes what they can prove in court
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram