0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:29 pm to Casualobserver1985
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:29 pm to Casualobserver1985
quote:
Difference on playing on an injunction and playing when the sec/ncaa are enjoined from rule of restitution..they cannot be penalized
Ya if they are barred they are barred. Not arguing otherwise. It's just something rolling around our there as a consideration.
I don't pretend to know what happens on the umpteenth appeal.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:29 pm to Honkus
quote:He got totally screwed when the chiefs forced him to achieve his lifelong dream of making an NFL roster
Happy for em but kinda wish Pyburn made it as well
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:30 pm to SloppyFrog
quote:
Ill tell you where LSU really won. Recruiting. We showed that we back the players. I know this wasnt an LSU lawsuit, however I believe LSU was instrumental in bringing this situation to the forefront
You are the only other person that I’ve seen look at it from this angle. That’s exactly what I said to my brother two days ago. We’re gonna do whatever is necessary to make sure our players are treated fairly. We stand behind them no matter what.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:31 pm to red sox fan 13
quote:
He got totally screwed when the chiefs forced him to achieve his lifelong dream of making an NFL roster
Absolute selfish reasons I will admit.
Imagine the ESPN talking heads...
"The NFL preseason sack leader is back in college!!!!1"
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:31 pm to red sox fan 13
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to Honkus
I've not been following this evening, is this tied to the SEC lawsuit or is that still a separate ongoing thing?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to Raging Tiger
frick you ross
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
It's Kentucky law, but it says what I have always thought is the law:
If the injunction is dissolved on appeal, you face the consequences
You piece of shite
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:33 pm to Raging Tiger
So punishment is or isn’t allowed upon appeal? I’m so confused. Some have said we’re safe and now apparently there is something out there that says otherwise….?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:34 pm to IM_4_LSU
quote:
So punishment is or isn’t allowed upon appeal? I’m so confused. Some have said we’re safe and now apparently there is something out there that says otherwise….?
No.. that just means if we don't roster em.. we cannot blame it on the SECs rule
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:39 pm to Honkus
Was talking about the other poster on the Kentucky v Lagely or whatever.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:47 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
then instead of referencing the contract, post it. like post the entire contract directly so we can read it ourselves.
hate to be the one that breaks this to you, but that is NOT his revenue sharing contract.
that is a separate contract that gives Washington (or insert any other school) the rights to use the player's Name, Image, or Likeness.
it's a separate contract because Revenue Sharing and NIL are tool completely different entitles.
also, this is NOT a contract septic to the quarterback you mentioned.
because if it was, the terms (dollar amount, years, etc.) would also be in there, and they aren't/
try again.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:47 pm to IM_4_LSU
“HEYYYYYYY OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH…SUCK THAT TIGER DIQ SANKEY”
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:48 pm to IM_4_LSU
So basically LSU isn’t allowed to cut the players or we are breaking the law
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:50 pm to lsupride87
There’s tons of posts over on the sec rant saying lsu will get thrown out of the sec now.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:53 pm to elprez00
Is this the longest ever first page of a thread?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:53 pm to elprez00
quote:
There’s tons of posts over on the sec rant saying lsu will get thrown out of the sec now.
For what?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:53 pm to UnsureTiger
(no message)
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:59 pm to boweswi05
ESPN just said former pro players ruled eligible players can return to LSU.
fricking disingenuous pieces of shite
fricking disingenuous pieces of shite
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:00 pm to Jabontik
quote:
So Harris never wore the uniform, got paid $190, but Cole Hutson got paid $1,074 from the Browns and Cowboys and wore the uniform. But Harris is the pro and Hutson is not, am I getting this right
For rookie minicamp, the NFL's Collective Bargaining Agreement ( LINK)says that certain players can participate “on a tryout basis.” Most importantly, it explicitly states, “no NFL Player Contract … exists as a result of his participation … on a tryout basis.”
A clearer passage I'll cite is on page 154 from the above link:
quote:
Section 9. Offseason Participation Contract:
(a) A player subject to a Required Tender by a Club, but who has not signed a Player Contract, or an Unrestricted Free Agent whose Player Contract with that Club has expired, may enter into an Offseason Workout Program and Minicamp Participation Agreement in order to participate in the offseason workout program and Minicamp(s) of that Club in the form set forth in Appendix Q to this Agreement. The standard Participation Agreement is set forth in Appendix Q to the CBA. A copy of all Participation Agreements shall be submitted to the NFL, which shall provide a copy to the NFLPA. This Section shall not apply to a Rookie subject to the Required Tender specified in Article 6, Section 3. The parties shall discuss and agree to the appropriate form of a participation
agreement for such players.
So according to the NFL, Hutson did not sign an NFL Player contract. He signed a Participation Agreement (a tryout agreement). The NFL does not consider it to be an NFL contract. So why would the NCAA and the SEC?
Page 97 of 103
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News