- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to la_birdman
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to la_birdman
UnsureTiger is a f’n legend!
0
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to MasterofTigerBait
quote:
quote:
Would have been interesting if the judge ruled LSU must roster the players to give LSU even further protection
LSU isn’t a party, so he couldn’t
Yeah but once the players' lawyers asked LSU to be included it could be taken that they became one, in a sense. But yes I see your point
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:25 pm to RobbBobb
I don't understand what y'all are angry about. Courts have gone both ways on if the NCAA can punish a school who plays a player under an injunction. It's not my opinion 
In any event, hilarious result. And hopefully that ridiculous SEC suit is next.
In any event, hilarious result. And hopefully that ridiculous SEC suit is next.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:25 pm to Honkus
Ill tell you where LSU really won. Recruiting. We showed that we back the players. I know this wasnt an LSU lawsuit, however I believe LSU was instrumental in bringing this situation to the forefront. We were the only one to buck the SEC and the NCAA. Now imagine coach O talking to a kid and his parents about how LSU has the back of the players...and backing it up with this scenario.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:26 pm to afinewagoneer
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This wiener is unrelenting… to me this tweet shows he wanted LSU to lose. But that’s just my opinion.
At least he has a job for the next year writing about this and LSU.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:28 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
Difference on playing on an injunction and playing when the sec/ncaa are enjoined from rule of restitution..they cannot be penalized
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:28 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
NCAA v. Lasege
It's Kentucky law, but it says what I have always thought is the law:
If the injunction is dissolved on appeal, you face the consequences.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:29 pm to Casualobserver1985
quote:
Difference on playing on an injunction and playing when the sec/ncaa are enjoined from rule of restitution..they cannot be penalized
Ya if they are barred they are barred. Not arguing otherwise. It's just something rolling around our there as a consideration.
I don't pretend to know what happens on the umpteenth appeal.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:29 pm to Honkus
quote:He got totally screwed when the chiefs forced him to achieve his lifelong dream of making an NFL roster
Happy for em but kinda wish Pyburn made it as well
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:30 pm to SloppyFrog
quote:
Ill tell you where LSU really won. Recruiting. We showed that we back the players. I know this wasnt an LSU lawsuit, however I believe LSU was instrumental in bringing this situation to the forefront
You are the only other person that I’ve seen look at it from this angle. That’s exactly what I said to my brother two days ago. We’re gonna do whatever is necessary to make sure our players are treated fairly. We stand behind them no matter what.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:31 pm to red sox fan 13
quote:
He got totally screwed when the chiefs forced him to achieve his lifelong dream of making an NFL roster
Absolute selfish reasons I will admit.
Imagine the ESPN talking heads...
"The NFL preseason sack leader is back in college!!!!1"
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:31 pm to red sox fan 13
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to Honkus
I've not been following this evening, is this tied to the SEC lawsuit or is that still a separate ongoing thing?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to Raging Tiger
frick you ross
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:32 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
It's Kentucky law, but it says what I have always thought is the law:
If the injunction is dissolved on appeal, you face the consequences
You piece of shite
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:33 pm to Raging Tiger
So punishment is or isn’t allowed upon appeal? I’m so confused. Some have said we’re safe and now apparently there is something out there that says otherwise….?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:34 pm to IM_4_LSU
quote:
So punishment is or isn’t allowed upon appeal? I’m so confused. Some have said we’re safe and now apparently there is something out there that says otherwise….?
No.. that just means if we don't roster em.. we cannot blame it on the SECs rule
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:39 pm to Honkus
Was talking about the other poster on the Kentucky v Lagely or whatever.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:47 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
then instead of referencing the contract, post it. like post the entire contract directly so we can read it ourselves.
hate to be the one that breaks this to you, but that is NOT his revenue sharing contract.
that is a separate contract that gives Washington (or insert any other school) the rights to use the player's Name, Image, or Likeness.
it's a separate contract because Revenue Sharing and NIL are tool completely different entitles.
also, this is NOT a contract septic to the quarterback you mentioned.
because if it was, the terms (dollar amount, years, etc.) would also be in there, and they aren't/
try again.
Page 97 of 100
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News