3
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:20 pm to icecreamsnowball
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:20 pm to icecreamsnowball
quote:
You’re wrong.
Kentucky Supreme Court (NCAA v. Lasege)
Look it up if you're interested. Or don't.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:20 pm to LSU4LIFEo85
quote:
don’t have to. We can roster them later as long as they’re enrolled. I believe…
Correct and I know for sure Wright and Teuhalimaka are enrolled. Heard conflicting about Harris & Cotton but we'll see
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:21 pm to JayVegas702
What had happened was..
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:21 pm to Honkus
quote:
Nahh they gotta be listed on the official roster 24 hours before the 1st game of season. Tomorr9w is the deadline. 105 players max
For that game. Major national reporter I think Thamel though started earlier that as long as they're enrolled they can be added later.
I'll try to find link
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:21 pm to Honkus
Would have been interesting if the judge ruled LSU must roster the players to give LSU even further protection
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:22 pm to JayVegas702
quote:
For that game. Major national reporter I think Thamel though started earlier that as long as they're enrolled they can be added later.
I'll try to find link
My bad.. I've been pretty locked in but didn't see that. Thanks
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:22 pm to purplepylon
quote:
Would have been interesting if the judge ruled LSU must roster the players to give LSU even further protection
LSU isn’t a party, so he couldn’t
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:22 pm to More beer please
quote:
new leadership and donors that are fed up.
Crazy what a new Governor, a competent attorney general, a new athletic director who isn’t a pussy, a native Louisiana president, and a coach who loves to troll can accomplish.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:23 pm to MasterofTigerBait
Unsure said plaintiffs attorney asked for LSU to be included before a decision was made
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:23 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
Kentucky Supreme Court (NCAA v. Lasege)
From 25 years ago?
Lulz
Everything, and I mean everything has changed in regards to amateur sports. Todays judge made that very clear. The new rule did not exclude these players AND the definition to what a professional has changed significantly
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to More beer please
quote:
They've been doing it to LSU for years. It just seems like we have new leadership and donors that are fed up.
Maybe the rest of the conference still has their DEI administrations in place.
Makes you wonder.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to la_birdman
UnsureTiger is a f’n legend!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:24 pm to MasterofTigerBait
quote:
quote:
Would have been interesting if the judge ruled LSU must roster the players to give LSU even further protection
LSU isn’t a party, so he couldn’t
Yeah but once the players' lawyers asked LSU to be included it could be taken that they became one, in a sense. But yes I see your point
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:25 pm to RobbBobb
I don't understand what y'all are angry about. Courts have gone both ways on if the NCAA can punish a school who plays a player under an injunction. It's not my opinion 
In any event, hilarious result. And hopefully that ridiculous SEC suit is next.
In any event, hilarious result. And hopefully that ridiculous SEC suit is next.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:25 pm to Honkus
Ill tell you where LSU really won. Recruiting. We showed that we back the players. I know this wasnt an LSU lawsuit, however I believe LSU was instrumental in bringing this situation to the forefront. We were the only one to buck the SEC and the NCAA. Now imagine coach O talking to a kid and his parents about how LSU has the back of the players...and backing it up with this scenario.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:26 pm to afinewagoneer
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This wiener is unrelenting… to me this tweet shows he wanted LSU to lose. But that’s just my opinion.
At least he has a job for the next year writing about this and LSU.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:28 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
Difference on playing on an injunction and playing when the sec/ncaa are enjoined from rule of restitution..they cannot be penalized
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:28 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
NCAA v. Lasege
It's Kentucky law, but it says what I have always thought is the law:
If the injunction is dissolved on appeal, you face the consequences.
Page 96 of 103
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News