- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It's time for LSU leadership (Rousse and Verge) to speak
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:49 pm
The brand is taking an absolute beating and being dragged through the mud in the CFB landscape. A lot of it misrepresented or flat out falsehoods. Regardless LSU has been made the face of this NCAA/SEC problem and they've largely remained silent to this point. Leadership needs to take control of whatever narrative they're going to go with and do some damage control. At this point, you can't continue to sit back and let your brand be scoured by one sided narratives.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:50 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Yeah, you would think they would have said something by now. I'm sure something will be out by the end of the day now that Sankey/SEC are suing them
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Probably anticipated this lawsuit coming and wanted to speak as little as possible.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to Lsuhoohoo
The best time to speak is notoriously in the middle of ongoing litigation - everyone knows that.
No one (should or) will say a word in the public sphere.
No one (should or) will say a word in the public sphere.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to Lsuhoohoo
We don’t comment on pending or ongoing litigation. They’ve played it smart so far and haven’t made a single comment that can be used against them.
Meanwhile, look what happens when you like to talk. There’s a reason lawyers tell you to not say anything. LSU is just letting Sankey and the universities behind this dig their own grave.
Meanwhile, look what happens when you like to talk. There’s a reason lawyers tell you to not say anything. LSU is just letting Sankey and the universities behind this dig their own grave.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to Lsuhoohoo
I think the opposite. The longer this has gone on with LSU's position being "we're talking with the SEC every day and working along side them", and everyone else trying to lose their mind, the better it has gotten for LSU in the public eye. More and more people are seeing this for what it is.
This latest lawsuit is only going to further that.
This latest lawsuit is only going to further that.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:53 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Verge was out at Ginos last night having a good time. Didn't seem worried about anything
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:53 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Fuuuuck off. The brand has never been more energized. We’ve bitched for years about how the SEC hates us, college football is a shitshow and sucks anyway, and the world has very short attention spans.
Watch what happens when we beat Clemson arse on Saturday.
As much as the SEC is going to hate it players are going to LOVE the rebellious team who will also pay well who goes to bat for the athlete.
Watch what happens when we beat Clemson arse on Saturday.
As much as the SEC is going to hate it players are going to LOVE the rebellious team who will also pay well who goes to bat for the athlete.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:54 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
The brand is taking an absolute beating and being dragged through the mud in the CFB landscape
I don't mind them talking, but they need to stay the course and fight this. They should start public discussions with the other conferences as long as the SEC plays this game.
The SEC is painting themselves into a very, very untenable corner
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:54 pm to Lsuhoohoo
This is unreal just going after LSU over something the players fought for. I don’t see how this can hold up.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm to Lsuhoohoo
I’m sure there will be some movement after the outcome of today’s hearing is known.
Judge could easily rule in SEC’s favor which renders this all moot and we just say “of course we were always abiding by court orders and SEC rules. We’re glad there is no conflict and will not be rostering the players.”
If judge rules in the players favor then it depends on what exactly the ruling is and how explicit it is as far as forbidding the SEC from enforcing penalties. But I assume we will hear something either tonight or tomorrow as far as what LSU plans to do and/or some LSU backed pushback in the media
Judge could easily rule in SEC’s favor which renders this all moot and we just say “of course we were always abiding by court orders and SEC rules. We’re glad there is no conflict and will not be rostering the players.”
If judge rules in the players favor then it depends on what exactly the ruling is and how explicit it is as far as forbidding the SEC from enforcing penalties. But I assume we will hear something either tonight or tomorrow as far as what LSU plans to do and/or some LSU backed pushback in the media
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:56 pm to Shimoda
quote:
They should start public discussions with the other conferences as long as the SEC plays this game.
"Given the public threats by the SEC, it was a matter of public responsibility to investigate membership in other conferences."
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
The brand is taking an absolute beating and being dragged through the mud in the CFB landscape.
Theyre about to have 20M viewers for an LSU game Saturday
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:58 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
Judge could easily rule in SEC’s favor
From a legal standpoint, I don't see it. They have done nothing to differentiate these players from other players the league is allowing to play.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:59 pm to tigerfan88
quote:didn't Kiffin already say as much, including that they were talking to the SEC daily?
Judge could easily rule in SEC’s favor which renders this all moot and we just say “of course we were always abiding by court orders and SEC rules. ”
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:59 pm to Lsuhoohoo
I just wonder at what point is the bridge burned. A Conference suing a founding member is just laughable.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:00 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Rousse spoke when he joined in the unanimous 16 to 0 vote in favor of the rule.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:00 pm to DalenSA
quote:
I'm sure something will be out by the end of the day now that Sankey/SEC are suing them
To some degree i get remaining quiet. They weren't parties to these lawsuits. Just interested observers. But with whatever outcome today plus the news of the conference suing, Verge as the AD needs to speak on it. State their position. You can't keep hanging LK out to dry as the only one to answer on this. Will the University/AD defend itself? Support it's coach? You can't keep letting the public story be written for/about you by Ross Dellenger.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:01 pm to SECmeister
It was actually 15-0. LSU did not vote
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:01 pm to Shimoda
The difference is, and I don’t know whether the judge will buy the argument, is the SEC is a more “selective” membership than the NCAA.
It’s bullshite but the SEC never got together and passed a rule saying JUCO players don’t have extra eligibility (Pavia) or extra medical redshirts don’t count (Chambliss). We haven’t had a judge consider whether the conference can include more restrictive rules than the NCAA.
It’s bullshite but the SEC never got together and passed a rule saying JUCO players don’t have extra eligibility (Pavia) or extra medical redshirts don’t count (Chambliss). We haven’t had a judge consider whether the conference can include more restrictive rules than the NCAA.
Popular
Back to top

14







