- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s going to seem ridiculous this year with granting players a 5th but..
Posted on 8/20/26 at 10:59 am to Motownsix
Posted on 8/20/26 at 10:59 am to Motownsix
quote:
The House settlement already killed the notion of a walk-on athlete at most skill. When unlimited eligibility comes around there isn’t going to be a place for many young players. When the LSU QB has an 8 year contract where does the HS kid go to develop?
This has been a huge problem in baseball, too, post COVID. It’s always been a thing with limited scholarships and rosters where a guy thinks he has a spot, some guy expected to get drafted and sign doesn’t get his number and makes it campus, and the original guy at the back of the roster is asked to be a preferred walk-on for a year with the promise he’ll be on scholarship the next. (Kinda like Saban and coaches of football powerhouses would ask guys to greyshirt at the last minute). Or asked to go to JUCO for a year, then transfer back. Hell, Jay JUST had to do this exact thing a week or 2 ago.
Sucks for the hypothetical we’re talking about, but has a trickle down effect too. Now that guy’s on a JUCO team, who also has limited scholarships and roster spots. So they have to cut an incoming high school guy whose career now is likely over. There have been thousands of high school baseball players whose careers have ended due to 4th and 5th year college guys sticking around that would have continued every year until the past 5 or 6.
Football won’t affect the same number of kids, but there will be some who’ve always dreamed of running out of the tunnel into Tiger Stadium—or wherever they’re at—who won’t have that opportunity now. Of course a lot of us had those dreams and didn’t get to experience them. It’s a privilege only afforded a special few. (In the grand scheme). But the kids we’re talking about were promised those dreams.
Again, the word I keep coming back to is gross. This just all feels gross.
Posted on 8/20/26 at 11:54 am to Bsnightlife
quote:
but this not English class we’re making post about sports it’s not that deep for me to worry about if I used commas correctly
Well you’re posting for others to read so it kinda matters to us.
If I wanted to hear about LSU from an idiot I go, well, to tRant. I’ll see my way out.
Posted on 8/20/26 at 11:59 am to Motownsix
quote:
The NCAA knew they were operating what people call a plantation system that was being propped up by some really shaky legal arguments. They’ve known this since at least 1984. This was inevitable unless they got out ahead of it, and they chose not to do anything but rule like a tyrant. The NCAA failed to save themselves from themselves and in the process they destroyed college athletics.
We talk about “the NCAA” like it’s some shadow, faceless, monolithic entity. But I actually looked it up a year or 2 ago when some of this stuff was happening. I’m going to get these numbers wrong, but I was shocked to find out who actually makes up “the NCAA.” There are very few people who only work for “the NCAA.” Something crazy like 10-20%. The other 80-90% are people whose full time jobs are working in different positions at universities.
So most of “the NCAA”’s allegiances are to their individual university and the university system of sports as a whole. The ones who’ve been profiting off of all these players the whole time. They’ve never had an incentive to do anything but maintain the status quo. As well meaning as the individuals that make it up may try to be, they are not this benevolent entity whose sole goal is to protect the sanctity of college sports and to do what’s in its and its athletes’ best interests.
At the end of the day, they are beholden to either the universities where they are employed full time (the 80-90%) or the university Presidents/Chancellors who hired/appointed them (the 10-20% who work for the NCAA full time). And the universities are the ones who have been reaping the rewards of all this “free labor” for over 100 years.
(I won’t go so far as to call it a plantation system, though. The players have always benefited from the infrastructure built by the universities and the platforms they’ve created to showcase the players. Nobody cares about the players until they put on the universities’ uniforms. I did this thought experiment once, over a decade ago when having this discussion. I probably have a few posts on it somewhere. But I was in Tiger Stadium for a huge LSU Bama game, maybe 2012 or 2014. HUGE game, full of All Americans and future NFL players all over the field, stadium packed to the brim, millions of people across the country tuned in on tv, etc…If you took those exact teams, exact same players, only took off their LSU and Bama unis and put them in generic ones with no history attached, if they had never played for LSU, Bama, or any other college team.
If you took those exact same players and had a game at Southern’s stadium just across town and charged a measly $10 entry fee, could you even fill THAT stadium? Half of it? A quarter? And if you put it on prime time ESPN, how many people would watch besides their family and friends? My guess is very few if any at all. So let’s not act like players haven’t benefitted greatly by the platforms and opportunities they’ve been given when they put on the uniforms of the universities that millions of people have developed significant emotional attachments to over the past 100 years).
Posted on 8/20/26 at 12:22 pm to Bsnightlife
Not a single period. Impressive wall. The 1 comma was a nice touch
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 8/20/26 at 12:40 pm to Bsnightlife
If players want to get to the pros and then come back, they should adopt the baseball model. After the draft you get x number of days to sign a contract or come back to college. But once you sign a pro contract, that should be the end of your eligibility.
Posted on 8/20/26 at 12:44 pm to Bsnightlife
quote:
granting players a 5th
Granting players “more than a 4th”.
Posted on 8/20/26 at 12:50 pm to gar90
quote:
f players want to get to the pros and then come back, they should adopt the baseball model. After the draft you get x number of days to sign a contract or come back to college. But once you sign a pro contract, that should be the end of your eligibility.
That makes sense as a college athletics remedy but extremely illegal in labor law. Once you leave a job you are forbidden to return? We would never tolerate such restrictions in our occupational lives.
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 12:51 pm
Popular
Back to top

0







