Started By
Message

Is bob barton the least professional of them all?

Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
31870 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:29 pm
quote:

McGovern sent a one-sentence email Tuesday to Alleva and Alexander informing them that Wade would meet with them only after the sweeping federal criminal investigation is complete. He carbon copied the LSU Board of Supervisors, LSU general counsel Tom Skinner and Barton. Barton responded with a multi-paragraph email detailing how McGovern broke the state’s attorney conduct rules by directly contacting Alleva and Alexander, condemning the action and writing that “such inappropriate communications will not be tolerated.



What kind of loser does this when the attorney is communicating with their client's superiors on behalf of their client.
Posted by Philippines4LSU
Member since May 2018
8789 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:31 pm to
These people are insanely arrogant and clearly pursuing an ulterior motive. It's not even deniabile at this point.
Posted by Hootie
BR
Member since Aug 2007
2125 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:32 pm to
Stay away from legal analysis and protocol. When a party is represented by counsel, any other attorney is forbidden from speaking directly to that person; all communication is to be made through the lawyers. WW and LSU can talk directly all they want.
This post was edited on 3/14/19 at 2:33 pm
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21309 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:32 pm to
He obviously felt personally insulted or is just trying to inflame his opposition in any way possible. Lsu has really put themselves up shits creek.
Posted by Da Joker
Member since Jan 2017
320 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:33 pm to
Maybe some of you lawyers can weigh in, but is it really a rule the a lawyer cannot contact an opposing party when there is no lawsuit or court case pending? Seems crazy.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84882 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Stay away from legal analysis and protocol. When a party is represented by counsel, any other attorney is forbidden from speaking directly to that person; all communication is to be made through the lawyers. WW and LSU can talk directly all they want.


But getting your panties in a wad over a one sentence email is absurd. It's not that he's wrong, it's that he's petty.
Posted by NBD
Member since Jul 2017
197 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:36 pm to
Under Louisiana's Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney who knows that another party is represented by counsel is strictly prohibited from contacting the opposing party directly. LSU is Barton's client. Wade's attorney knows that Barton is representing LSU. Yet, Wade's attorney contacts LSU directly. Wade's attorney could get disbarred for this conduct.
Posted by strose
Meshry
Member since Apr 2011
423 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

But getting your panties in a wad over a one sentence email is absurd. It's not that he's wrong, it's that he's petty.


You're surprised that a lawyer is petty? Wait till you start figuring out politicians, buddy.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32494 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Is bob barton the least professional of them all?

Does he wear a earring?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84882 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

You're surprised that a lawyer is petty? Wait till you start figuring out politicians, buddy.



It's not surprising, it's hardly worth mentioning, but Dellenger pieced a story together out of it.
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4169 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Under Louisiana's Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney who knows that another party is represented by counsel is strictly prohibited from contacting the opposing party directly. LSU is Barton's client. Wade's attorney knows that Barton is representing LSU. Yet, Wade's attorney contacts LSU directly. Wade's attorney could get disbarred for this conduct.


What a joke. These Neanderthals constantly embarrass LSU every chance they get but could get a lawyer disbarred over a 1 sentence email? This would make me want to break all support to LSU until every single one of these clowns are gone. They are a complete disgrace to LSU and their profession.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:40 pm to
I think, "A fricking SKRONG-arse offer" is being more unprofessional. But, apparently, that's just me and a few others.
Posted by LSUBadger
Member since Jan 2014
2238 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:42 pm to
Wade’s lawyer is in New York I believe

I doubt he is overly concerned with Louisiana Bar discipline
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84882 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:42 pm to
quote:


I think, "A fricking SKRONG-arse offer" is being more unprofessional. But, apparently, that's just me and a few others


That's fine, but unfortunately you'll suck in CBB in perpetuity as a result.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:43 pm to
The legal ethics rules prohibit attorneys from contacting people they know to be represented by counsel about the subject of the representation unless that person’s attorney gives permission or court order/other law permits it, what makes Barton’s response really petty and overdramatic is he represents the school, he doesn’t represent Alexander or Alleva individually so whether Wade’s Attorney actually broke the ethics rules is really up for debate. In this case, it probably wouldn’t be grounds for any discipline because of all the ambiguity, Barton must’ve just been having a bad day when he responded.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11481 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

When a party is represented by counsel, any other attorney is forbidden from speaking directly to that person; all communication is to be made through the lawyers. WW and LSU can talk directly all they want.


So LSU can have their attorney present at a meeting with WW. I presume the attorney would speak to WW at that meeting. WW is always represented by counsel. He has an agent etc.
So, LSU's attorney could never speak to WW?

Screw the BOS and these attorneys.
Posted by NBD
Member since Jul 2017
197 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:43 pm to
Bar rules between the states are reciprocal. Stay out of the legal field. You will get hurt.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112620 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:44 pm to
Plattsmier finna eat
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4338 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:44 pm to
Not really true. That is supposedly attorney ethics. But it does prevent any of the activity so far. They are not in litigation. Which is where it might matter
Posted by DWaginHTown
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2006
9858 posts
Posted on 3/14/19 at 2:46 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram