- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/14/19 at 3:41 pm to Adam Banks
I think he probably has the smallest dick.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 3:41 pm to Elleshoe
Or even better.
Let’s not make waves over something like this when we have bigger fish to fry.
Or
Maybe it’s good that we make sure it’s ok to keep all lines of communication open cause when communication stops .....
Let’s not make waves over something like this when we have bigger fish to fry.
Or
Maybe it’s good that we make sure it’s ok to keep all lines of communication open cause when communication stops .....
Posted on 3/14/19 at 3:43 pm to GetBackToWork
I certainly would not have responded as Barton responded. A simple request to Wade's attorney that all further communications to LSU should be forwarded to me (if I am Barton) only would have sufficed. Wade's attorney would have gotten the message without the unnecessary attitude.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 3:50 pm to NBD
quote:
I certainly would not have responded as Barton responded. A simple request to Wade's attorney that all further communications to LSU should be forwarded to me (if I am Barton) only would have sufficed. Wade's attorney would have gotten the message without the unnecessary attitude.
Ok, you aren't defending his tone, but simply his request. I should hope someone representing LSU, particularly during this delicate situation, might employ more tactful language. Barton might be better suited for insurance claim defense.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 3:56 pm to GetBackToWork
To all those that contend this was unethical could you refer me to any Louisiana bar sanction that came from communication such as this which was a notification and not a discussion of the matter at hand nor an invitation to discuss the matter at hand.
You won't find one.
You won't find one.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 4:02 pm to GetBackToWork
Anyone who knows Bob Barton personally or who has been adversarial to his client will tell you he is the epitome of a “professional”. He will not raise his voice , curse or commit actions that are even considered borderline. No issue with him calling Wade’s attorney out for communicating directly with LSU Admin. There is an established protocol that has to be followed and it’s there for a reason.
The issue is the decision to include the NCAA in the interrogation. Garrity would protect Wade from having a statement given to his employer under the threat of termination from being used against him in a criminal proceeding. It would not protect him , however, if a third party like the NCAA is involved and present. LSU should order the interrogation without the NCAA as part of complying with his employment contract, Wade should comply and then LSU can advise the NCAA of its findings. This is the appropriate protocol for internal investigations that involve potential criminal issues.
The issue is the decision to include the NCAA in the interrogation. Garrity would protect Wade from having a statement given to his employer under the threat of termination from being used against him in a criminal proceeding. It would not protect him , however, if a third party like the NCAA is involved and present. LSU should order the interrogation without the NCAA as part of complying with his employment contract, Wade should comply and then LSU can advise the NCAA of its findings. This is the appropriate protocol for internal investigations that involve potential criminal issues.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 4:03 pm to GetBackToWork
quote:
Ok, you aren't defending his tone, but simply his request
Was that not obvious? You had people in this thread arguing against his legal definitions of words with generic dictionary words like they knew what they were talking about. haha
Posted on 3/14/19 at 4:13 pm to michael corleone
quote:
he issue is the decision to include the NCAA in the interrogation. Garrity would protect Wade from having a statement given to his employer under the threat of termination from being used against him in a criminal proceeding. It would not protect him , however, if a third party like the NCAA is involved and present. LSU should order the interrogation without the NCAA as part of complying with his employment contract, Wade should comply and then LSU can advise the NCAA of its findings. This is the appropriate protocol for internal investigations that involve potential criminal issues
Thanks That was helpful.
If the NCAA tells LSU they cannot meet with Coach Wade regarding this issue without the NCA present.
Do you know anything about how that would work
Posted on 3/14/19 at 5:06 pm to slackster
quote:
That's fine, but unfortunately you'll suck in CBB in perpetuity as a result.
Meh, I'd rather lose than cheat. I get ZERO satisfaction from cheating. But again, I seem to be in the minority there.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News