Started By
Message

re: In retrospect this team probably overachieved

Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:10 am to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91265 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

To try & string that into a sentence about overachieving is weak & desperate at best.


That's what this thread was about though.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:17 am to
You brought the talent stuff to the thread. The same extremists you are mocking puts you in the same category, just on the other side. Do better
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91265 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:21 am to
quote:

You brought the talent stuff to the thread. The same extremists you are mocking puts you in the same category, just on the other side. Do better


Bro, the OP started with Chaisson's injury and the lack of production from Giles. That's clearly a talent argument.

ETA - And the first page of the thread is littered with arguments about a lack of talent on this team.

Come on Lester, be better.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:23 am
Posted by Silvermoon_WhereRU
Member since Jun 2016
2399 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:25 am to
I think everyone assumed the wheels were going to come off the LSU program this year and that didn't happen at all. In fact, we beat the shite out of some teams that everyone had us circled to get dominated by including Miami, Georgia, and Miss State. No one had us winning @Auburn either and this team got it done. So in those ways, we over-achieved what were very low expectations of LSU in the preseason.

For LSU fans, you want to see the building of a program, stockpiling of talent in the offseason, and the utilization of that talent during the year. I think Orgeron has only been moderately successful in that so far. We've had misses in recruiting in each of his classes. We've managed to flip John Emery which is huge, land Stingley and K.Thomas early which are all elite prospects as well. It looks like Sopsher is not coming so let's see who he can close with so that this recruiting class fills a lot of holes in places of need.

Then you have to develop the guys he's brought into the program that weren't top national recruits too. All those DL guys he brought in during the last two classes and the guys he's flipping from DL to OL are going to have to develop. Aranda was able to overcome losing Chaisson despite not really having any other elite pure pass rushers on the roster so offensively we have to be able to implement a scheme that protects us when our OTs aren't all conference talent.
Posted by RightHook
Member since Dec 2013
5560 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

9-3 is not overachieving at LSU. Not this year not ever.


when dinardo took over, we were coming off the worst 6 years of lsu football.

7-4-1 in 95
10-2 in 96
when he went 9-3 in 97 a lot of people didn't care for it. only beating notre dame in the bowl game saved the season.

i totally agree that 9-3 will always = average. 9-4 is even worse.

don't need his head on a chopping block this year. if he only wins 9 next year, he needs to be canned.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16814 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:28 am to
Those predictions were before Burrow signed.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109353 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

7-4-1 in 95
10-2 in 96
when he went 9-3 in 97 a lot of people didn't care for it. only beating notre dame in the bowl game saved the season.

i totally agree that 9-3 will always = average. 9-4 is even worse.

don't need his head on a chopping block this year. if he only wins 9 next year, he needs to be canned.


3rd year will almost always be the best measuring stick for a coaching hire. You're right, that's when you could start to tell the wheels coming off with Gerry.

Next year is huge for O.
Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Next year is huge for O.

Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time. When E moves on and O has to hire a new OC, the third in three years, the excuse for underperformance next year will be that "We have a new system and it takes time to get everyone up to speed. Next season we will be ready and a powerhouse!"
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time. When E moves on and O has to hire a new OC, the third in three years, the excuse for underperformance next year will be that "We have a new system and it takes time to get everyone up to speed. Next season we will be ready and a powerhouse!"


You need to have a friend sit down with you and read what you are saying. Stop being a maniac Dave.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62065 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

You need to have a friend sit down with you and read what you are saying. Stop being a maniac Dave.



And yet the talking point was that O was going to live and die by the E choice after the Canada debacle. And yet, Dave's statement is looking more and more likely to come to fruition.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33763 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time.


This is lunacy. I wasn't a fan of the Ensminger hire, but to think he would purposely make a shitty hire to buy himself an extra year or two, rather than make a great hire and last 10 more years is fricking retard level stupid.

How do you people make it through the day without getting run over in traffic?
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:49 am
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215934 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:48 am to
Spoiled much????
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21651 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:49 am to
quote:

9-3 is not overachieving at LSU. Not this year not ever.


The 1990s called and would like a word with you.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107796 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:50 am to
I would say they underachieved.


Looking at the season objectively, they should have been 10-2 with losses to Bama and UGA


Must wins for lsu (i removed lsu game from their record)

7-4 miami
7-4 auburn
la tech
rice
SELU
5-6 ole miss
8-3 miss state
2-9 arky
7-4 a&m


Those 9 games are absolute expected wins. One cant objectively argue winning those games is considering anything but what should be expected


8-3 UF is a push at the swamp. I expect though personally to beat a uf team that loses to Kentucky and Mizzou


Bama and UGA are lagniappe this year if you win. But UGA could be considered a toss up with it at home


This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 12:04 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

And yet the talking point was that O was going to live and die by the E choice after the Canada debacle. And yet, Dave's statement is looking more and more likely to come to fruition.



First of all, Dave’s post alleges that O hired E as a move to buy him time. Let’s all laugh at how fricking dumb that is.

Secondly, If the offense stalls progress next year then there surely won’t be any excuses. Especially after all the praise O gives E. That’s his guy for now.

LSU Football Isn’t player out over a message board. Moves aren’t made to “buy time” or for future excuses. Like Oregeron doesn’t want to win as many games as possible. You two are legitimately insane if that’s what you think.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59872 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:11 pm to
Gators are a rivalry game for us. Safe to say they get up for us more than they do for either of those teams. so them losing to those other teams don’t mean much. It would be like Georgia fans saying how did we lose to LSU when they lost to Florida who we handled. ain’t no shame in losing to the gators in Florida.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62065 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

First of all, Dave’s post alleges that O hired E as a move to buy him time. Let’s all laugh at how fricking dumb that is.


How dumb is it? Do you honestly find O thinking that E was the best OC candidate out there to be more realistic? If so, that's foolish.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62065 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I think everyone assumed the wheels were going to come off the LSU program this year and that didn't happen at all.


How do you define "wheels coming off"? Again, I am roundly viewed as being "anti-O" (whatever that means), and I had us at 8-4 this year. I viewed that as being pretty bad for LSU, all things considered. Well, we're 9-3 and the O sycophants are pushing a narrative that LSU has had some sort of extraordinary season, where we overachieved.

Again, this is madness.
Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:20 pm to
He didn't purposely make a shitty hire, he made a comfortable easy hire from within. He hired someone who he knew would do as told and play safe and conservative and knew that if things went wrong, he would have someone else to offer up rather than himself.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59872 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:22 pm to
O wanted to work with someone he could get along with. I’m sure after the Canada issue he didn’t wanna go through that again. Having a canada on staff who can’t get along with no one is bad for a coach like O who is trying to build a culture. That dog don’t hunt. can’t blame him.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram