- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In retrospect this team probably overachieved
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:10 am to Lester Earl
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:10 am to Lester Earl
quote:
To try & string that into a sentence about overachieving is weak & desperate at best.
That's what this thread was about though.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:17 am to slackster
You brought the talent stuff to the thread. The same extremists you are mocking puts you in the same category, just on the other side. Do better
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:21 am to Lester Earl
quote:
You brought the talent stuff to the thread. The same extremists you are mocking puts you in the same category, just on the other side. Do better
Bro, the OP started with Chaisson's injury and the lack of production from Giles. That's clearly a talent argument.
ETA - And the first page of the thread is littered with arguments about a lack of talent on this team.
Come on Lester, be better.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:23 am
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:25 am to slackster
I think everyone assumed the wheels were going to come off the LSU program this year and that didn't happen at all. In fact, we beat the shite out of some teams that everyone had us circled to get dominated by including Miami, Georgia, and Miss State. No one had us winning @Auburn either and this team got it done. So in those ways, we over-achieved what were very low expectations of LSU in the preseason.
For LSU fans, you want to see the building of a program, stockpiling of talent in the offseason, and the utilization of that talent during the year. I think Orgeron has only been moderately successful in that so far. We've had misses in recruiting in each of his classes. We've managed to flip John Emery which is huge, land Stingley and K.Thomas early which are all elite prospects as well. It looks like Sopsher is not coming so let's see who he can close with so that this recruiting class fills a lot of holes in places of need.
Then you have to develop the guys he's brought into the program that weren't top national recruits too. All those DL guys he brought in during the last two classes and the guys he's flipping from DL to OL are going to have to develop. Aranda was able to overcome losing Chaisson despite not really having any other elite pure pass rushers on the roster so offensively we have to be able to implement a scheme that protects us when our OTs aren't all conference talent.
For LSU fans, you want to see the building of a program, stockpiling of talent in the offseason, and the utilization of that talent during the year. I think Orgeron has only been moderately successful in that so far. We've had misses in recruiting in each of his classes. We've managed to flip John Emery which is huge, land Stingley and K.Thomas early which are all elite prospects as well. It looks like Sopsher is not coming so let's see who he can close with so that this recruiting class fills a lot of holes in places of need.
Then you have to develop the guys he's brought into the program that weren't top national recruits too. All those DL guys he brought in during the last two classes and the guys he's flipping from DL to OL are going to have to develop. Aranda was able to overcome losing Chaisson despite not really having any other elite pure pass rushers on the roster so offensively we have to be able to implement a scheme that protects us when our OTs aren't all conference talent.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:26 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
9-3 is not overachieving at LSU. Not this year not ever.
when dinardo took over, we were coming off the worst 6 years of lsu football.
7-4-1 in 95
10-2 in 96
when he went 9-3 in 97 a lot of people didn't care for it. only beating notre dame in the bowl game saved the season.
i totally agree that 9-3 will always = average. 9-4 is even worse.
don't need his head on a chopping block this year. if he only wins 9 next year, he needs to be canned.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:28 am to Powerman
Those predictions were before Burrow signed.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:31 am to RightHook
quote:
7-4-1 in 95
10-2 in 96
when he went 9-3 in 97 a lot of people didn't care for it. only beating notre dame in the bowl game saved the season.
i totally agree that 9-3 will always = average. 9-4 is even worse.
don't need his head on a chopping block this year. if he only wins 9 next year, he needs to be canned.
3rd year will almost always be the best measuring stick for a coaching hire. You're right, that's when you could start to tell the wheels coming off with Gerry.
Next year is huge for O.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:33 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Next year is huge for O.
Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time. When E moves on and O has to hire a new OC, the third in three years, the excuse for underperformance next year will be that "We have a new system and it takes time to get everyone up to speed. Next season we will be ready and a powerhouse!"
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:40 am to Dave England
quote:
Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time. When E moves on and O has to hire a new OC, the third in three years, the excuse for underperformance next year will be that "We have a new system and it takes time to get everyone up to speed. Next season we will be ready and a powerhouse!"
You need to have a friend sit down with you and read what you are saying. Stop being a maniac Dave.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:43 am to Lester Earl
quote:
You need to have a friend sit down with you and read what you are saying. Stop being a maniac Dave.
And yet the talking point was that O was going to live and die by the E choice after the Canada debacle. And yet, Dave's statement is looking more and more likely to come to fruition.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:47 am to Dave England
quote:
Hiring E was a strategic move by O last year to buy himself more time.
This is lunacy. I wasn't a fan of the Ensminger hire, but to think he would purposely make a shitty hire to buy himself an extra year or two, rather than make a great hire and last 10 more years is fricking retard level stupid.
How do you people make it through the day without getting run over in traffic?
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:49 am
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:48 am to Draconian Sanctions
Spoiled much????
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:49 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
9-3 is not overachieving at LSU. Not this year not ever.
The 1990s called and would like a word with you.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:50 am to Powerman
I would say they underachieved.
Looking at the season objectively, they should have been 10-2 with losses to Bama and UGA
Must wins for lsu (i removed lsu game from their record)
7-4 miami
7-4 auburn
la tech
rice
SELU
5-6 ole miss
8-3 miss state
2-9 arky
7-4 a&m
Those 9 games are absolute expected wins. One cant objectively argue winning those games is considering anything but what should be expected
8-3 UF is a push at the swamp. I expect though personally to beat a uf team that loses to Kentucky and Mizzou
Bama and UGA are lagniappe this year if you win. But UGA could be considered a toss up with it at home
Looking at the season objectively, they should have been 10-2 with losses to Bama and UGA
Must wins for lsu (i removed lsu game from their record)
7-4 miami
7-4 auburn
la tech
rice
SELU
5-6 ole miss
8-3 miss state
2-9 arky
7-4 a&m
Those 9 games are absolute expected wins. One cant objectively argue winning those games is considering anything but what should be expected
8-3 UF is a push at the swamp. I expect though personally to beat a uf team that loses to Kentucky and Mizzou
Bama and UGA are lagniappe this year if you win. But UGA could be considered a toss up with it at home
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:00 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
And yet the talking point was that O was going to live and die by the E choice after the Canada debacle. And yet, Dave's statement is looking more and more likely to come to fruition.
First of all, Dave’s post alleges that O hired E as a move to buy him time. Let’s all laugh at how fricking dumb that is.
Secondly, If the offense stalls progress next year then there surely won’t be any excuses. Especially after all the praise O gives E. That’s his guy for now.
LSU Football Isn’t player out over a message board. Moves aren’t made to “buy time” or for future excuses. Like Oregeron doesn’t want to win as many games as possible. You two are legitimately insane if that’s what you think.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:11 pm to lsupride87
Gators are a rivalry game for us. Safe to say they get up for us more than they do for either of those teams. so them losing to those other teams don’t mean much. It would be like Georgia fans saying how did we lose to LSU when they lost to Florida who we handled. ain’t no shame in losing to the gators in Florida.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:14 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
First of all, Dave’s post alleges that O hired E as a move to buy him time. Let’s all laugh at how fricking dumb that is.
How dumb is it? Do you honestly find O thinking that E was the best OC candidate out there to be more realistic? If so, that's foolish.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:17 pm to Silvermoon_WhereRU
quote:
I think everyone assumed the wheels were going to come off the LSU program this year and that didn't happen at all.
How do you define "wheels coming off"? Again, I am roundly viewed as being "anti-O" (whatever that means), and I had us at 8-4 this year. I viewed that as being pretty bad for LSU, all things considered. Well, we're 9-3 and the O sycophants are pushing a narrative that LSU has had some sort of extraordinary season, where we overachieved.
Again, this is madness.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:20 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
He didn't purposely make a shitty hire, he made a comfortable easy hire from within. He hired someone who he knew would do as told and play safe and conservative and knew that if things went wrong, he would have someone else to offer up rather than himself.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:22 pm to Dave England
O wanted to work with someone he could get along with. I’m sure after the Canada issue he didn’t wanna go through that again. Having a canada on staff who can’t get along with no one is bad for a coach like O who is trying to build a culture. That dog don’t hunt. can’t blame him.
Popular
Back to top


2






