- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm not as pessimistic as others, there are reasons why you wouldn't pitch Skenes today..
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:25 am to Tiger1988
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:25 am to Tiger1988
quote:
Tulane would have hit Floyd harder than Skenes and they hit him HARD.
This right here is all anyone needed to read to know you don't have any credibility on this topic. You are already arguing against all objective reason to defend a ridiculous decision, and now you say they hit Skenes hard. What game were you watching?
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:30 am to drizztiger
quote:
I'm not as pessimistic as others, there are reasons why you wouldn't pitch Skenes today..
I get that. We all do, it's not some magical TD poster thought.
But I hope posters could see both sides...
Nicholls was close to beating Bama just now.
I know I said before, but we weren't as matter of fact winning this game today. Even with Skenes on the mound, we had multiple double plays that helped the game closer.
Dude, you have to win with someone other than Skenes on the mound. What game are you going to have easier than Tulane to do that with.
There zero benefit to beating Tulane if it makes it harder to be Oregon State.
When you say, "we might not have beaten Tulane without Skenes" then what the frick do you think is going to happen today?
There is no other side. It was a dumb decision. At best, we are 50/50 today.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:31 am to mikelbr
quote:
Don't ever compare football to baseball.
Sometimes that’s all you people understand
It’s more akin to having the lead late in a game, and you have the ball, coming up on a 4th & inches. Instead of going for it and ending the game, you punt…. Or pitch Skenes in GM1.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:31 am to LSUNV
quote:
Either way it’s over so can we move on?
Jay Johnson needs to be buried with this decision if LSU loses today.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:34 am to The Boat
quote:
LSU is going to win the regional
We better hope that Oregon State's pitching is in worse shape than we realize.
Cause if we score 7-8 today, we probably lose.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:40 am to King Joey
quote:
Was I the only one that noticed we only won by 5 today? The way everyone is assuming such a huge dropoff going to Floyd, how in the world are y'all so 100% can't possibly be wrong that we were absolutely guaranteed a win with Floyd on the mound?
What a stupid argument.
If Floyd isn't going to beat Tulane, do you think he's going to beat Oregon State? Which team do you think he has the best chance of beating.
quote:
Just flat out asking: do any of y'all even perceive the possibility that your analysis could be wrong
Are you saying that we have a better chance of beating both Tulane AND THEN Oregon State by pitching, in order Skenes/Floyd vs. Floyd/Skenes?
Are you retarded?
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:47 am to drizztiger
Still can’t figure out why the Tulane coach pulled Lombardi. It was 6-2 and he retired seven or eight batters in a row and Tulane seem to have the momentum. He pulled Lombardi and just like that Tulane fizzled.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:50 am to GoldenAge
quote:
Dude, you are basically saying we were guaranteed a win today no matter who we threw, but are doomed tomorrow because it isn’t Skenes. The pitching staff you’re considering an automatic win with on Friday is the same one you’re claiming dooms us Saturday. If we would have threw Floyd tonight and lost, would you have saved PS bc we MIGHT play OSU in the winners bracket after eliminating someone?
My god. Our fans are dumb.
If you lost against Tulane with Floyd then, in hindsight, you can say that there's no decision that would have gotten us out of a regional. If he didn't beat Tulane, he wasn't going to beat Oregon State.
A logical argument to start Skenes against Tulane is that you think Tulane on Friday is a tougher game than Oregon State on Saturday when you consider the pitching remaining. I think that's an absurd opinion as evidenced by the way that they swing the bats and by how poor of a Tulane has shown to be over the year.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 9:53 am to TackySweater
quote:
TackySweater
You’re the same poster who was shitting all over a positive thread just last week. Shitting all over the bullpen and the team.
You bring nothing of context to the discussion of the decision to start Skenes. You’re a shite poster who has nothing of quality to add.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 10:06 am to LSUcajun77
quote:
You’re the same poster who was shitting all over a positive thread just last week. Shitting all over the bullpen and the team. You bring nothing of context to the discussion of the decision to start Skenes. You’re a shite poster who has nothing of quality to add.
Just using a discussion board for discussion.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 10:10 am to mikeytig
To me it breaks down like this:
Regional games 1 and 2, Skenes / Floyd (in some order) will be your starters against 4 seed Tulane (19-40) and 2 seed OSU (39-18). Who should face whom? On paper there should be no discussion how the strategic matchups should work here.
Those defending Skenes v Tulane seem to be arguing…
1) Pitching matchups: Our ace vs. Tulane ace; and our #2 vs OSU #4/5
2) “Hot” opponent. Whatever this actually means, to them Tulane was hot and OSU I guess wasn’t
3) Results. Skenes won game 1 vs. Tulane. So, see it worked. Oh, and tulane hit Skenes hard so floyd was obviously gonna have trouble with them
Now, though, here’s what’s being minimized by the Skenes v tulane defenders:
1) OSU is obviously the better team (compared to tulane) by virtue of their overall record and stats.
2) 20+ hits and 18 runs (I know I know, against SHU) screams serious opposition for game 2, which was already suggested by point #1, they’re overall record and stats.
I get it, Floyd vs team’s #4 pitcher is advantage from pitching duel standpoint.
However, I’d prefer to look at it from a pitcher v. batter standpoint. Floyd v. Tulane bats and Skenes v OSU bats seems like the better odds for this regional’s setup
Regional games 1 and 2, Skenes / Floyd (in some order) will be your starters against 4 seed Tulane (19-40) and 2 seed OSU (39-18). Who should face whom? On paper there should be no discussion how the strategic matchups should work here.
Those defending Skenes v Tulane seem to be arguing…
1) Pitching matchups: Our ace vs. Tulane ace; and our #2 vs OSU #4/5
2) “Hot” opponent. Whatever this actually means, to them Tulane was hot and OSU I guess wasn’t
3) Results. Skenes won game 1 vs. Tulane. So, see it worked. Oh, and tulane hit Skenes hard so floyd was obviously gonna have trouble with them
Now, though, here’s what’s being minimized by the Skenes v tulane defenders:
1) OSU is obviously the better team (compared to tulane) by virtue of their overall record and stats.
2) 20+ hits and 18 runs (I know I know, against SHU) screams serious opposition for game 2, which was already suggested by point #1, they’re overall record and stats.
I get it, Floyd vs team’s #4 pitcher is advantage from pitching duel standpoint.
However, I’d prefer to look at it from a pitcher v. batter standpoint. Floyd v. Tulane bats and Skenes v OSU bats seems like the better odds for this regional’s setup
Posted on 6/3/23 at 10:51 am to gabzooks
quote:
However, I’d prefer to look at it from a pitcher v. batter standpoint
You have to look at it all.
You have to consider your likely offensive production vs them vs. their likely offensive production vs. you.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a straw man. You did not accurately describe his point. His larger point was correct in terms of optimal thinking/strategy. Now, I can't assess if he's correct as it applies to this situation (the strategy he's criticizing may have been the optimal strategy and you won), and I'm not weighing in on that. I'm just saying you used a logical fallacy in response.
Ehhhhhh lol
Everyone that disagrees is just mad because they think their way is the best way
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:37 am to TackySweater
quote:
Everyone that disagrees is just mad because they think their way is the best way
There could be two different paths to the same outcome (in this case, win game 1), yet one path could be objectively “better,” right?
That’s all anyone is suggesting for game 1, with implications for the rest of regional
This post was edited on 6/3/23 at 11:38 am
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:37 am to drizztiger
I think Skenes should be out there today, but there are some thing to at least halfway justify yesterday.
1. Keep Skenes on schedule.
2. OSU has 1 starting pitcher and he went yesterday. they also only have 3 LHP and 1 onoy pitches midweek games. we will have the pitching advantage today.
3. tulane’s bats have been hot heading into yesterday. didn’t win the AAC tournament on their pitching.
I still think we could have won yesterday with Hurd and has Skenes today and Floyd tomorrow, but I also think we can win today and tomorrow with Floyd and Hurd.
1. Keep Skenes on schedule.
2. OSU has 1 starting pitcher and he went yesterday. they also only have 3 LHP and 1 onoy pitches midweek games. we will have the pitching advantage today.
3. tulane’s bats have been hot heading into yesterday. didn’t win the AAC tournament on their pitching.
I still think we could have won yesterday with Hurd and has Skenes today and Floyd tomorrow, but I also think we can win today and tomorrow with Floyd and Hurd.
This post was edited on 6/3/23 at 11:55 am
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:43 am to gabzooks
Subjectively, not objectively.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:45 am to gabzooks
quote:
There could be two different paths to the same outcome (in this case, win game 1), yet one path could be objectively “better,” right?
If you’re objectively looking at game 1 and winning that game, then objectively, the best decision was to pitch your best guy.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:46 am to subotic
quote:
Subjectively, not objectively
In some cases, there may only be subjectively “better” paths.
A season of baseball (for Tulane and osu) allowed for a reasonably objective analysis comparing the two
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:49 am to TackySweater
quote:
If you’re objectively looking at game 1 and winning that game, then objectively, the best decision was to pitch your best guy.
Objectively looking at game 1, skenes was your best option. Objectively looking at game 2, skenes is your best option, now unavailable. Shucks
Posted on 6/3/23 at 11:58 am to gabzooks
quote:
In some cases, there may only be subjectively “better” paths.
Well yeah. That's what I'm saying. It's completely academic and hypothetical if the results are the same. We don't have the results yet so how can we attempt to objectively analyze anything at this point?
Popular
Back to top
