Started By
Message

re: I just have an alarming feeling the SEC will eliminate us for not playin 8 games

Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52149 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

in that case the game has no benefit to LSU, and no detriment.

True.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95830 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

It's in the rules. So yeah, technically the SEC has said this.
And 8 games must be played is also in the rules....
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
10601 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

And 8 games must be played is also in the rules....


Exactly. So some clarification is needed, huh?
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18147 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

7-1 = higher winning percentage, so that trumps in the tie-breaker.


but there's no "tie" because teams haven't played the same number of games. Therefore, the tiebreaker doesn't kick in.

100% chance that LSU and UF will be forced to play, if either one is still in the mix. The SEC won't allow a team to win their division without playing their full SEC schedule.

Just no way that will happen.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 1:14 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95830 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

LINK
That is Scott Rabalais. I know what the rules say. The rules also say 8 games "shall" be played.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111088 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

I'd bet every penny I owe and even my children's lives that the SEC won't allow a team to go to Atlanta if they haven't played all their conference games
That seems highly irresponsible and reckless.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95830 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Exactly. So some clarification is needed, huh?
Yes
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17922 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Beat the shite out of everybody and run up the score as much as possible. If no SEC championship then so be it. It will still be a fun year and the SEC will know who the best team was.
In this scenario, I would approve of going Ole Missish and hanging an SEC champs banner.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

The rules also say 8 games "shall" be played.


And if it's not a possibility..........we don't get in.



IF we run the table.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95830 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

And if it's not a possibility
The SEC rules dont say anything about if its not a possibility. They simply say 8 games shall be played.

So the SEC either has to announce the game is being played, or announce another way to determine the champion. Simply sitting and doing nothing will be a contradiction to the rules
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18147 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

That seems highly irresponsible and reckless.


Relax, Francis, I was exaggerating to make a point.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111088 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Relax, Francis, I was exaggerating to make a point
So you wouldn't bet your children's lives?

Thanks for the clarification, I wasn't sure, thought maybe you actually would.

Appreciate it!!!
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158773 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

bet we get screwed if we win out. Either way, we dont go to the SECCG without playing florida, I just dont see it uner any scenerio


then we'll take UF down with us....ANARCHY ANARCHY
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

They've already said 7-1 makes it over 6-1They actually came out and said that? Link?


Ask the 1972 Auburn Tigers who was SEC Champ. Even though they beat Alabama, the Tide played one more game.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111088 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

The SEC rules dont say anything about if its not a possibility
According to the page 1 Advocate link, they do:

quote:

Per SEC rules, if teams don’t play the same number of games, the team with the higher win percentage goes to the championship game


quote:

or announce another way to determine the champion
Doesn't that quote in the rules(assuming it's there, based on the Advocate link) tell us everything we need to know?
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 1:39 pm
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
10172 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:47 pm to
From SEC Bylaw 30.22.1.3:

The Conference champion will be determined by a game between the two division champions. The team in each division with the highest percentage of wins during all regular-season conference competition will be declared division champion.
Posted by iamandykeim
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
2624 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:49 pm to
I think they'd move the championship and have us play florida if that happened
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:51 pm to
Here's the SEC constitution and bylaws for 2016-2017.

LINK

I can't find a single reference to a requirement that the teams play an equal number of games, etc. I go back to my previous point -- all tiebreaker rules are irrelevant if there is not a tie.

So where is the by-law or rule that states the division winner is selected based on winning percentage?

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95830 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Per SEC rules, if teams don’t play the same number of games, the team with the higher win percentage goes to the championship game
This is nowhere in the actual rules. The Advocate, which is shite, took 1+1 and made it equal 4
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 1:54 pm
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:53 pm to
Current SEC bylaw 30.22.1.3:

30.22.1.3 Conference Championships. Conference championships are subject to the following:
(a) A Conference champion shall be determined annually in each of the sports listed in Bylaw 30.22.1.1. The method of determining the Conference champion for each of these sports shall be provided for in the Commissioner’s Regulations of each sport. When two institutions tie for a championship and no championship play-off is held, these institutions shall be declared co-champions; and
(b) A member institution’s team or teams, prohibited by the Southeastern Conference or the NCAA from participating in postseason competition in a given sport, shall not be eligible for a Conference championship and participation in a Conference season-ending event (e.g., game, tournament, meet) in that sport for the
duration of this prohibition. [Revised 6/1/12]

ETA: There is nothing about wins/win pct.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 1:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram