How many provisions of the PCSA will be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court?

None. The Commerce Clause in the Constitution gives Congress full authority to regulate interstate business in the US, and all current trust laws were originally written by Congress, so they can change them as needed.

quote:

---

How many provisions will be struck down as unconstitutional, and how will it affect LSU?

---

You're getting downvoted, but if this bill existed... right now, LSU would be in the effing MAC.

Given the current position LSU is in with the SEC, what would be the worst thing for LSU?

Will they give the SEC anti-trust protection?

quote:

---

That doesn’t affect the Constitution, and it doesn’t stop the U.S. Supreme Court from reviewing laws that Congress passes.

---

Only if there are constitutional grounds for such oversight, which in this case there are not because it falls under the Commerce Clause. There is no constitutional provision on what is and is not an illegal trust. That was defined by the Congress in the early 20th Century in varied pieces of legislation. Therefore, they can alter and create exceptions to those laws as they see fit. That's what they did in the Sports Broadcasting Act that gave the NFL a limited anti-trust exemption.

Remember, anti-trust was the legal basis for the case that brought the House Settlement, and the USSC's legalization of NIL. That puts it soley in the hands of the Congress to define.

quote:

---

That’s what I’m afraid of. This law might actually ruin college sports. The SEC will frick LSU however it wants if this law passes.

---

No, because when the Feds give you an exception, they also give you oversight. Go ask the NFL this. They have had every decision they make have to pass by a Minnesota Federal Court for the last 30 years. You don't hear about it cause the court inly steps in when there is an issue, which is rare.

You're also operating under the false assumption that LSU was ever at serious risk here; they were not.

quote:

---

And i'm telling you they won't

---

But they can

Well, it's not a commerce clause only an interstate commerce clause. It does not give Congress plenary power over all commerce, only sufficient power to maintain the free flow of goods and services across state lines.

Unfortunately, SCOTUS has amended the commerce clause by "interpretation" to expand its reach to almost every aspect of commerce- which is not supported by the text or the writings concurrent with the writing of the commerce clause. For example, in Federalist 42, James Madison describes how the clause will limit cross-state tariffs, referring to similar prohibitions in Switzerland, Germany and the Netherlands.

So, the lesson here is that the Constitution has been slowly and steadily "interpreted" (amended) to have meanings contrary to the text and history of the text.

quote:

---

Well, it's not a commerce clause only an interstate commerce clause. It does not give Congress plenary power over all commerce, only sufficient power to maintain the free flow of goods and services across state lines.

Unfortunately, SCOTUS has amended the commerce clause by "interpretation" to expand its reach to almost every aspect of commerce- which is not supported by the text or the writings concurrent with the writing of the commerce clause. For example, in Federalist 42, James Madison describes how the clause will limit cross-state tariffs, referring to similar prohibitions in Switzerland, Germany and the Netherlands.

So, the lesson here is that the Constitution has been slowly and steadily "interpreted" (amended) to have meanings contrary to the text and history of the text.

---

Translation: The USSC will not throw out the PCSA.