Started By
Message

re: How come everyone is good until we play them

Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:01 am to
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
43168 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:01 am to
MSU has a big gam.vs Bama

I will be live it when I see it but I will be mentally clanging that freaking cowbell
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43138 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:02 am to
To be fair, aTm was identified as the most likely fraud in the top 10 before the season started and after the UK loss a lot of talking heads were saying that they were not a good team.

But I get your point.
Posted by andouille
A table near a waiter.
Member since Dec 2004
11876 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:06 am to
quote:

After we play them oh they're no good.

Just watch as we go through the schedule. People saying Kentucky is improved and cowbell has a QB - but after we destroy them - oh they weren't any good. It's a long season.


I was wondering the same thing. I think we are now the "bad guys" of CFB. No problem.
Posted by Lapaz
Member since Dec 2018
939 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

After we play them oh they're no good.

Just watch as we go through the schedule. People saying Kentucky is improved and cowbell has a QB - but after we destroy them - oh they weren't any good. It's a long season.


Yep. Clemson was top 25 until we destroyed them. La Tech hung 80 points on a very weak team, but was considered a top 75 team, until we destroyed them. Ole Miss was top 20, and were playing at home with all the emotion. We were their super bowl, yet they barely beat us, and now they are locked into a higher ranking than us because it is perceived that they are better, even though we dominated the 2nd half. Texas A&M was a top 25 until we destroyed them.
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
482 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:07 am to
Ole Miss kinda the opposite tbh lmao
Posted by cfish140
BR
Member since Aug 2007
9425 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:26 am to
Yeah the only talk from the A&M game is how bad Reed has been. No credit to our defense or mention how much better Leavitt looked in the pass game
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Ft. Lauderdale
Member since Jul 2005
33644 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:33 am to
It’s called rationalization. All of the negative Nancy’s that think we suck seek rationalization for their arguments, even after we win convincingly.
Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
7125 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:34 am to
Always been that way.
Hell Fournette made Spurrier quit.
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
355 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:47 am to
i specifically remember watching talking heads and podcasts. I'm not talking about the AP, Coaches or any voting committee.
Posted by SmoothBox
Member since May 2023
3049 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Yeah the only talk from the A&M game is how bad Reed has been. No credit to our defense or mention how much better Leavitt looked in the pass game


LSU beat the shite out of the same team Kentucky beat the shite out of.

Yes it was a good bounce back win, but I mean it’s not exactly a ground breaking win.
Posted by GulfSouthTiger
Member since Jun 2025
768 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:14 pm to
If Clanga beats Gumpland, no one will be saying that
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram