- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Here's the PI no call in the end zone
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:34 am
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:34 am
decide for yourself
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:35 am to Jim Rockford
Post an actual gif and I'll tell you.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:36 am to Jim Rockford
Should have won in regulation.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:38 am to sjmabry
quote:
Should have won in regulation.
The personal foul penalty after the Bama fumble took care of that.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:39 am to Jim Rockford
Hate to say it, but from that pic the defender has his eyes square on the ball. Good no call.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:42 am to gar90
doesn't change the fact that he can't be on top of the receiver like he is in that picture
It was PI without a doubt
It was PI without a doubt
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:43 am to gar90
quote:
Hate to say it, but from that pic the defender has his eyes square on the ball. Good no call.
And 90% of his body touching Dural while the ball's still 5 feet away
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:45 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
Here's the PI no call in the end zone
Th3 picture is of 3rd down and they're on the 5 yard line, dummy.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:48 am to gar90
So, you apparently don't know the rules.
But yeah, that's not in the endzone.
But yeah, that's not in the endzone.
This post was edited on 11/10/14 at 12:49 am
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:48 am to LSUtiger17
your not allowed to go through the receiver to get to the ball.
learn the rules before you spout oh from that picture it is good no call.
It proves he went through the receiver and affected his chance at the ball.
Typical person who doesn't know a thing about football saying good n call.
But to think paid off bama refs were going to call that against them is not realistic.
If you beat bama you beat them and the refs which our team did in the 9-6 game.
Go back and look at the holding not called in that game.
learn the rules before you spout oh from that picture it is good no call.
It proves he went through the receiver and affected his chance at the ball.
Typical person who doesn't know a thing about football saying good n call.
But to think paid off bama refs were going to call that against them is not realistic.
If you beat bama you beat them and the refs which our team did in the 9-6 game.
Go back and look at the holding not called in that game.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:53 am to CalcoTiger
LSU got away with a PI in the end zone which led to Bama missed FG
Posted on 11/10/14 at 1:07 am to biglego
quote:
LSU got away with a PI in the end zone which led to Bama missed FG
What does this have to do with anything? Why does one bad call make up for another bad call? How about the officials just follow the rules and call penalties as they occur. I don't get why people are making excuses for these officials. They were blatantly bad the whole game. They missed calls everywhere. It affected the game and the outcome. That shouldn't happen.
I really do hope that Miles pursues action, like he suggested he would. There needs to be some kind of accountability and penalty for this crew..
Posted on 11/10/14 at 1:34 am to Jim Rockford
That is clearly pass interference. The defensive back has already left his feet. If he is not draped over Durel he takes one more step and catches the ball and walks in. If it is not interference then the DB would have fallen to the ground due to gravity and not been able to make the play.
The 2nd down play the DB rode Dupre out of bounds while the ball is in the air.
The fourth down play also had some hand checking but 2nd and 3rd down were farmore egregious.
The 2nd down play the DB rode Dupre out of bounds while the ball is in the air.
The fourth down play also had some hand checking but 2nd and 3rd down were farmore egregious.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 1:42 am to gar90
quote:
Hate to say it, but from that pic the defender has his eyes square on the ball. Good no call.
FYI having one's "eyes square on the ball" is not the standard. As noted by others, can't go through the offensive player to get to the ball.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 2:17 am to Jim Rockford
I'll let you know when I see someone in the endzone
Posted on 11/10/14 at 2:20 am to Jim Rockford
Good no call. You can't tell from a picture you need to see the whole clip.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 2:49 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
Good no call. You can't tell from a picture you need to see the whole clip
Just curious- what other visual evidence would you need? The ball is in the air, has not been touched between the quarterback and the receiver and the defensive back s clearly draped over the receiver's back. His feet have left the ground and there is no space between their bodies.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 6:21 am to tigersbb
You don't need any other evidence. They just want to sound like the "educated" unbiased fan instead of calling it like it is-a screw job. They sound like typical gumps even focusing on the one call that went our way with jalen Collins and not seeiing that for every 1 bad call Bama gets they get 3 the other way.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 6:24 am to Jim Rockford
It was clearly pi, with that being said should have won in regulation! We gave that game awawy, time to move on!
Posted on 11/10/14 at 6:24 am to tigersbb
that's PI for sure but I want to see the no call on 4th down
Back to top
