Started By
Message

re: Here is my Baseball information

Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:00 am to
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
102913 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:00 am to
This should be interesting...
Posted by lsuhou74
Houston
Member since Jan 2015
3926 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:05 am to
Would love to see Fontenot in the rotation.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:07 am to
Let’s fricking ride

Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75746 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:08 am to
None of what you said disputes anything I said. It only lets people knw you lack reading comprehension skills.

And have a shitty avatar.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45508 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:11 am to
quote:

This should be interesting...


The shame is, it shoudn't be interesting.

I knew Morgan wasn't going to play and I wasn't sure why.. which is exactly what I stated. I then googled a bit and saw he had been released from Harwich.

So out of the blue, I post a little bit of info and out myself as not having ALL the info because I didn't know for sure why.

Then PP comes in as if he's in the know and the kid just needed to be activated.

He didn't have to do that. Arrogance and idiocy? I assuming the P stands for projection.
Posted by TigerLaw40
Member since Aug 2017
2790 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:11 am to
quote:

If it's Washburn, Heid, and Shaffer, that's really fricking exciting.

Project, what is the story on Washburn? Meaning, can you give more analysis and context on him?

I looked him up over the weekend when I read in another thread that he was a possibility to transfer here and his numbers at OSU seem a bit underwhelming (low innings, +3 ERA, +1.1 WHIP). All I could find on his pitching arsenal was his recruiting profile, which showed he is possibly a 3-4 pitch mix guy, which is good, but looked like FB topped out at 90 mph, although I'm assuming that has bumped up some in college as he has gotten stronger, but that is just an assumption. Any insight is appreciated.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6680 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:12 am to
quote:

He's one of our better pitchers (so him throwing more innings is better than him throwing fewer).
He's proven more effective in longer outings fewer times per week.
He's got to have some incentive to come back from a personal development standpoint.

I think it's a good move to give him a shot there.


I've been waiting for him to start ever since he set foot on campus. Mainieri indicated before his freshman season that he thought Devin could eventually start. I noticed the same thing you have about him being better in longer outings.

But it seemed like after Mainieri tried to start him that one time (not counting the times he's opened midweek games as part of a bullpen game) against Oregon State in the regional in '18, and it didn't go so well, he just gave up on that idea. Nevermind that he was a freshman going up against the best team in the country that year, and that everyone has a bad game sometimes. I thought after Fontenot's performance against FSU in the Supers the next year, that surely he had earned at least a chance to start coming into his junior year. Still didn't happen.

He's a good reliever, but he's one of those guys who needs to get into the flow of the game before he settles in. That's not what you want for a closer, and perhaps Jay has sold Devin on the idea of upping his stock as a starter, and maybe getting more innings would also help him develop better command (another reason why I wanted to see him start years ago).
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 10:14 am
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75746 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Then PP comes in as if he's in the know and the kid just needed to be activated.


No I didn't, YOU frickING RETARD.
Posted by TigerLaw40
Member since Aug 2017
2790 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Fontenot will get a look at being a starter.


Project or Ell, what are the thoughts here (Project, I saw that you gave some already)?

I really like Fontenot and I agree he has looked good in some extended outings; but to me he still seems like more of a closer. He reminds me a bit of Hess, not in his pitching style or ability, but more just his demeanor and personality on the mound. I know a lot people felt Hess would never make as good of a starter as a closer because he couldn't approach it with the same mindset of just coming in off adrenaline and pounding the zone as hard as he could with max effort on everything like he seemed to prefer to do.

Fontenot to me has a lot of that in him. He feeds off the big moments and adrenaline and just wants to give max effort every time on the mound, which doesn't seem to be the best approach for a starter. But I very much could be wrong and just misreading, which is why I'd like other's input.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75746 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Project, what is the story on Washburn? Meaning, can you give more analysis and context on him?


He's a guy we're pursuing out of Oregon State. I believe he's currently pitching for Team USA. So he's highly thought of even if the stats don't show it. 1.1 WHIP is really good though. For college, average is somewhere around 1.4.

ETA: The biggest number that stands out is the over 9 K/9. If you can average more than a strike out per inning, there is something there. He looks like he's been more of a multi inning reliever than a starter. Absent a true ace, those guys become extremely valuable.

On 7/3 he threw 3 innings in the USA CNT game. Gave up 1 hit, 2 walks, 2 K, no runs.
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 10:25 am
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45508 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:16 am to
Dang you really hate my avatar. Let's just get back to talking shop.

Sorry to derail your thread, Nap.
Posted by StevieG504
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
3824 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:21 am to
Who gives a shite what was said or taken out of context get out of your feelings and self entitlement
Posted by Sir Fury
Member since Jan 2015
5011 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Lol. Member when I got shite on and told he just needed to be activated on a Cape roster?


No, dumbass. You were told he wasn't taken off a roster he was never on. He was never deactivated because he was never activated.

You have a horrible combination of arrogance and idiocy.


Actually I said: "Morgan off the roster in Harwich. Not sure why just yet."


Then you said: ProjectP2294 "He hasn’t been activated yet. Hard to be off a roster when you haven’t yet been on it."

As if you had any fricking clue what was going on with Morgan and they just needed to put his name on the list.

You didn't have any clue and tried to make me look like a dumbass. Just take the L and learn that google searches don't always give you all you can know about what's up with certain players.





Dude…you bolder the wrong part. Your reading comprehension skills are lacking significantly.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61616 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

He's proven more effective in longer outings fewer times per week.
He's got to have some incentive to come back from a personal development standpoint.

I think it's a good move to give him a shot there.



While this makes sense, the eye test tells me he won't be successful as a starter.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
81660 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:30 am to
Not sure what yall see that leads yall to think he cant/wont succeed as a starter
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45508 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Dude…you bolder the wrong part. Your reading comprehension skills are lacking significantly.


So help me out. From what was Morgan released?

Go look up my post. I linked the article in it.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87159 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:47 am to
I already admitted that I simply have a bad taste in my mouth because of our history trying to turn closers into starters.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
51853 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:51 am to
I’m late to the party but

quote:

Hilliard will be back. Fontenot will be back unless something changes with the draft. Same with Dugas.


Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
70909 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I already admitted that I simply have a bad taste in my mouth because of our history trying to turn closers into starters.


Wouldn't you say Fontenot may be a little different though? He's had a ton of outings over his career where he threw a lot of pitches. Hell, he threw almost 100 pitches against FSU in the super regionals in 2019 and only gave up 2 hits. I just think he'd be in a little different situation than Ott and Hess when they transitioned to being a starter
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87159 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 10:56 am to
The situations are very different. Fontenot does have some experience going over 50 pitches already. He's much older than Ott and Hess were when we made the attempt to move them. But unfortunately, like them, he's a two-pitch, high effort guy who may not have a ton of success going 3 times through a lineup.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram