- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:17 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
It's absolutely retarded that LSU did not get out in front of this. Just an abject failure.
Get out in front of what? The ruling was unsportsman like conduct. LSU was supposed to anticipate that Dabo would stoop low enough to try to get it upgraded to fighting so the kid had to sit in the 1st half?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:19 pm to ProjectP2294
Yeah this is really petty and amateur of Clemson. Maybe for a conference game you might consider this, but not for a non-conference game.
Either way it won’t matter… LSU will win.
Either way it won’t matter… LSU will win.
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:20 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Get out in front of what? The ruling was unsportsman like conduct. LSU was supposed to anticipate that Dabo would stoop low enough to try to get it upgraded to fighting so the kid had to sit in the 1st half?
If that's what Dabo did, then I misunderstood the situation.
frick Clemson even harder then.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:20 pm to JPLSU1981
Dabo gonna call routes high over the middle to bait us into targeting. Dont take the bait!!
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:20 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Yeah this is really petty and amateur of Clemson. Either way it won’t matter… LSU will win.
Why would you do something as petty as this only to give a team even more reasons to kick your arse…
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:20 pm to ProjectP2294
I mean, the Clemson reporter stumbling upon this while “doing his research” is pretty fricking laughable. Obviously it was fed to him.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:21 pm to DBG
Clemson sources are “confirming” he is suspended, and Clemson brought this to the NCAA’s attention.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:22 pm to DBG
quote:
stumbling upon this while “doing his research” is pretty fricking laughable
my thoughts exactly
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:22 pm to DBG
quote:
I mean, the Clemson reporter stumbling upon this while “doing his research” is pretty fricking laughable. Obviously it was fed to him.
Right, I get all that.
I mean, if he actually had the NCAA re-rule on it, rather than just ask for clarity.
If he had them review it to change their ruling on it, they should have told him to frick off. That's not his job.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:37 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
Haulcy was ejected for "unsportsmanlike conduct" during their game.
As did the BYU WR who was also ejected. The BYU WR was suspended for the first half of their next game (bowl game). If that was an NCAA suspension then I can't see how the same doesn't apply to Haulcy. BOTH were ejected for "unsportsmanlike conduct". Was the BYU WR sitting out because of a violation of school rules vs. NCAA rules? Did the NCAA retroactively determine it was incorrect to have the BYU WR sit out the first half of the bowl game.
Everyone is focusing on the "unsportsmanlike" vs. "fighting" distinction. But we have two guys ejected for the same reason. One was suspended. So the question is why shouldn't the other?
No one in the thread has yet to address that question. Where is the distinction between the two players?
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:39 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
LSU was supposed to anticipate that Dabo would stoop low enough to try to get it upgraded to fighting so the kid had to sit in the 1st half?
God came to him in a dream and told him to do it.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:40 pm to Alt26
Cause you bitch. One suspension would be 9months later. Maybe BYU didnt follow the rules and did it on their own accird
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:45 pm to extremelsu
quote:
Cause you bitch. One suspension would be 9months later.
The rule clearly says the suspension will be served in the next game...even if is the next season. You have guys for ECU and NC State who were ejected in the bowl game at the end of last season who are sitting out this year's season opener.
quote:
Maybe BYU didnt follow the rules and did it on their own accird
Maybe so. But that seems like an easy answer to get by someone with access to the information. It would certainly clear up a lot of speculation.
You can get mad at me all you want. I'm simply asking, in an effort to get a firm answer, if one guy who was involved in the same incident and was ejected on the same basis was forced to serve a suspension why wouldn't the other?
It seems like the NCAA should be able to answer that very simple question pretty easily.
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:50 pm to Alt26
Maybe BYU doesn’t know how to read a rule book.
Maybe LSU and the SEC does. There’s a clear distinction between Fighting and UC.
Maybe LSU and the SEC does. There’s a clear distinction between Fighting and UC.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:52 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:55 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Maybe BYU doesn’t know how to read a rule book.
Maybe LSU and the SEC does. There’s a clear distinction between Fighting and UC.
Then that opens up a whole other issue of WTF is the NCAA doing? They have a rule. Not BYU, not Houston, not LSU or the SEC, but the NCAA. Yet, they leave it up to the individual teams to determine how interpret THEIR rule?
EDT: If the NCAA wasn't aware of the potential issue until (allegedly) Clemson brough it to their attention then why have a rule in the first place? The apparent discussion at NCAA HQ
Employee 1: We have a rule that if a player is ejected for fighting they have to sit out the first half of the next game.
Employee 2: Ok. What if it happens in the team's last game of the season?
Employee 1: Oh. Well, then they have to sit out the 1st half of the first game of the season?
Employee 2: Sounds good. Should we keep a list of the guys who are ejected in their last game so we know who has to serve their suspension the next season?
Employee 1: Nah. I'm sure someone here will remember.
This doesn't seem like it should be an issue that has be address 2 days before the opener. Did the NCAA just forget about their own rule?
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:56 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
yes. fricking real games are too tough Pull for someone else. We either belong or we don’t, We will know about 9 Saturday.
You do not however have to play one in the opener EVER.frickING.YEAR!
The last time we won the opener was 2019. The opponent? Georgia Southern. We played Texas week 2. Was that schedule soft?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:56 pm to extremelsu
quote:
Maybe BYU didnt follow the rules and did it on their own accird
This is possible. They could have incorrectly assumed (like a bunch on here) that since he was ejected for unsportsmanlike he has to sit a half.
It's also BYU. It might have been an additional violation of team rules.
The BIG 12 could have also reviewed it and determined Haulcy didn't warrant additional punishment, but Lassiter did (Here is another video of Lassiter hitting someone else during that scuffle):
Posted on 8/28/25 at 4:04 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
Clemson sources are “confirming” he is suspended, and Clemson brought this to the NCAA’s attention.
This was all brought about after NCState announced their suspensions today.
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News